bochead, if only all owners were like you!
AlanMoore
Yesterday's tragic case is similar to others in recent years in that the child killed was not resident in the home where the dogs attacked.
This is a key issue. However "family-friendly" the dog, IMO they should always be kept well away from visiting children.
As I said earlier, it's the dog owners who insist their dogs are gentle, soft and friendly and couldn't hurt a fly who are the most dangerous to know.
kawliga points out that
It jumped on me when I arrived to pick her up, not in an aggresive or scary way but I felt how strong and heavy it is and that was a new experience for me, not unpleasant but also not very comfortable.
The dog was not locked way, it was running about the house while I was there.
I was shocked to be met by it at the door.
All of these points illustrate that these dog owners are simply not responsible. They are not putting the safety of visiting children first.
I think OP has been very reasonable in her description of this event, and in her concern. In circumstances like that, I would make a point of having playdates with this friend at my house and explain to the owner that I simply wasn't comfortable with DD being in a set-up where playing children had to encounter a large dog wandering around. You are allowed to be polite and assertive about these things!
In fact I do always ask whether DDs friends have a dog. Many of her friends do, but they are usually small, manageable family pets and a few of them are very old and very quiet. But I always make a point of telling the friend's mum that DD is very nervous around dogs so they can either introduce them carefully, or shut the dog away from the children.
Our local craft shop has a resident dog which is really sweet and we have made many visits there as I have encouraged my DD to realise that not all dogs are the same as the one who gave her an early terrifying experience. However the damage is done - she will never be comfortable around dogs.