Ha! I can 'cope' without DH, in fact I 'cope' for weeks on end without him but when we are invited to a wedding or a dinner, then we're not being invited to babysit some miserable in-law, grumpy assed friend of a friend, we're be asked to join in the celebrations of our friend/family member who's getting married...
Our time is precious, we like to enjoy our days/nights out together, together.
If a bride and groom wish to micromanage HOW we enjoy our day and theirs to that degree they obviously don't give a shit whether we enjoy ourselves or not, so I'd like to know in the invite that we're expected to be pawns for Bridezilla and Groomzuki who really just want their idea of perfect and propriety at the expense of the whole point of having guests at all, which is to share in the celebration.
WHY is it even in the bride and groom's remit to 'encourage conversation' at a point in the day when most people like to discourage it? It's absolute rubbish, out of date, unnecessary and bullish.
Oh and at MY relxed wedding where I sat friends with friends on all sorts of different sized tables, where I must have been 'discouraging conversation' two people, who didn't know each other beforehand, were placed on two separate tables, and are now married to each other!
It's nopt about 'coping without your spouse over dinner' it's about meglomaniacs forcing you to mingle as if you're too stupid to do it yourself, and it's those people that need to 'get a grip' frankly.
Meh.
As you can see I absolutely HATE talking to strangers, which is why I'm a member of a public discussion forum with nobody I know. All the reasons FOR separating people are illogical and unreasonable. Fact. 