to think that people with neck tattoos should not be presenting children's TV?

[PenfoldRocks]

Surely there are thousands of others just as capable at doing the job?

Is it an offensive tattoo?

Why is someone with a neck tattoo less than capable then??

Dont' judge a book by it's cover.

And why should they be chosen over someone with a tattoo?

What's wrong with tattoos?

But having a neck tatoo isn't neccesarily a bad thing is it?. Unless it is obscene or racist.

It doesn't make them uncapable to doing a good job.

*capable OF
I don't think so, I just don't think it's appropriate!
(am thinking of Junior Bakeoff man)

Is there something in the water today?

Who is it doing the presenting?

Wtf.

Discrimination.

No, they are obviously scummy thugs

Why isn't it appropriate though? What's your reasoning here?

A neck tattoo! He is obviously a very dangerous criminal.

Somebody call the Daily Mail!!! Our poor children!

Why?

No, they are obviously scummy thugs

And part-time peedos?

In what precise way is it "inappropriate"?

Seriously?

Plenty of the children watching will have parents with all sorts of tattoos. Should only a certain type of person be allowed to be seen on tv?

Please would someone collect DS asap? I have a tattoo on the back of my neck and he must be saved!

I wouldn't want my child to be asking for a neck tattoo - I think it would narrow his chances of getting a good job (rightly or wrongly and understand my circular argument).

As any fule kno, a neck tattoo is the branding of a danger bastard.

I bet that presenter has bodies under his floorboards.

OP YANBU and don't let this miserable lot tell you otherwise.

Justin Fletchers nipples were sticking out a few days ago.

It depends on the definition of a good job.

If he wanted to do science, for example, I don't think it would matter at all.

A good job like presenting kids tv for instance?

Not on the BBC but ITV would be ok