I think this would get more support if it was made easier to understand.
I do have quite a lot of awareness about disability, but I have next to no awareness about the benefits available. I would really really appreciate it if someone could explain things to me.
I have read a bit about this welfare reform bill and the Spartacus report but there are things I would like simple to understand information on. It doesn't go far enough to explain why PIP is so undesirable.
I understand that the report says that the overwhelming majority of disabled or ill people disagree with the changes. Obviously their opinion matters a lot, but how do I as a lay person know that they understood the changes fully and were able to make an informed disagreement? For all I know, they might just be scared of change and do not want to risk it so they will object without knowing the effect the changes will have.
I understand that the government want to reduce disability benefits by 20%. That sounds like a lot, but I don't know if that means they are going to be more rigorous at making sure people don't stay on it for too long after they have recovered, or if they are going to stop giving it to rich pensioners, or stop giving it to people who are disabled because of an accident but have received a huge payout or what. My uneducated guess would be that there must be people out there who receive Disability benefits but could go without them and not see a huge difference to their lifestyle.
I know what DLA is supposed to cover and that it is not means tested and can be given to people both in and out of work and children. But I don't know about income support or incapacity benefit. I thought PIP was going to replace DLA but I could be wrong. I don't know that if people no longer get DLA that they won't be supported through the other benefits.
I know that we are all feeling the pinch in a big way at the moment. I don't know if disabled people should be completely immune to that or not. My reason being that disability varies to a massive massive extent. Some will be able to cope and some won't, but fundamentally I don't have any objection to the system being reviewed to see if money can be saved. So because I don't know enough about it all, I find it hard to object.
Please don't have a go at me for this, I am genuinely making these points because I want to understand. There are people on this thread wondering why there isn't more objection to welfare reform, and my reason for that is that people just don't understand enough about it. I don't think it's because people don't care and I don't think it's because people think it will never happen to them. It can be hard to ask for the answers to simple questions, especially on MN, because anyone that doesn't automatically agree with the MNers who live with disability get accused of being daily mail, or gets a proper flaming. I have read many times that disabled people get sick of explaining stuff, which is more than fair enough. But it doesn't help those of us that could at least put our name to the objections if only we understood them.
I do think though that there is a common belief that there is no way this country would allow people to suffer if they are disabled, I believe that myself to some extent. I think that might be another reason for the lack of support from some people.
If you have read my mammoth post without judging me for not fully understanding, thank you!