nickschick, thank you so much for your posts
OP, there are really rubbish nurseries out there and no doubt that some of the anecdotes here will be representative of some nurseries, but not all.
DS spent WAY more time in a bouncer when he was at home with me at that age, nursery would set up multiple baby gyms, take him outside to interact with other children and with plants in the garden and did loads of stuff I neither had the equipment or the patience to do
Where my son is sounds very like nickschick's workplace and this was why we chose it over some others in the area specifically because:
It was a small setting with a limited number of children meaning that all the staff and children are familiar with each other, they will only have 6 or less at any one time in their baby room.
The daysheets are detailed, you get lots of info about what they've been doing (I also get lots of verbal feedback but this especially helps now I am seperated and ExP doesn't aways remember to tell me everything they say when he picks DS up_
The staff ratio in all the rooms (one for each age range, babies, toddlers, preschool) is 1:3 meaning that for every 3 children there is 1 member of staff often more in the baby room - iirc CM can have a 1:5 ratio, and to be fair it is 1:5 in the preschool.
The children all have solid relationships with their keyworker, i.e. when DS was a baby 90% of his care was given my a lovely lady called Lou, who cried on his last day with her, as another poster said I know he got lots of cuddles and affection and would rock him to sleep, because I witnessed it by randomly turning up to check up on him varying pick up times. They are like family to the kids they care for, as demonstrated when my DS last week told me he loved his key worker and another staff member
And low staff turnover - for me, this was key and was the best bit of advice a friend who manages a nursery gave me, is that crap nurseries have a high staff turn over as the staff find it upsetting to see crap childcare. DS's nursery have had 3 leavers in the last 2 years, one was the assistant manager who went to manage another nursery, one who left to care for an elderly relative and another who has gone off to be DJ..
Ironically the massive nursery down the road (which has an outstanding OFSTEAD rating) has a huge turnover of staff, a collegue whose DD is there has said the staff change from month to month, the babies are 20 to a room and she never sees or gets any feedback from her DD's keyworker. For pre-school kids it's amazing, french lessions, yoga, swimming lessons and is a forest school
It's all about choosing the right setting for you and your child - go with your gut and if you really have any concerns about where you have placed him, turn up unexpectedly to see if you're getting told one thing and they're doing another and if you do think DS is unhappy you can always move him!
Also, lots of people critisie WOHMs for not spending enough time with their DCs to bond properly etc... But you don't hear people constantly clamouring that WOHDs should give up work in order to have a full and fulfilling relationship with their DCs - it's about quality time rather than quantity of time.
Why do we as women feel the need to attack each others choices so much? Maybe the OP's choice isn't much of a choice at all, but we should be supporting her not spreading horror stories and attempting to induce guilt by saying her child will suffer because she's choosing to provide financial stability over being a SAHM
Bit more solidarity, bit less judgeypants oneupmanship eh?