DLA fraud is notoriously low because even if someone can pull the wool over the eyes of their GP they can't do the same with a specialist.... and currently the DWP ask for reports from both. I currently provide at least five different reports for each of my children with their applications.
ATOS will be getting rid of this rigorous system in favour of a 30 minute assessment with a doctor employed by an agency that has been given the job of cutting claims by the government. Never mind that specialists state you meet the criteria, their 30 minute interview will be far more important in awarding the claim (or not, in the majority of cases).
Some statistics. DLA has a fraud AND ERROR rate of 0.5% (this figure from an actual DWP document). I will try to find the link to the document for perusal. DLA is underclaimed by some 40% (meaning that for all that claim DLA there are at least 40% more who meet the criteria but don't claim).
Yet the government want to CUT claimants by 20%.
You don't have to be a genius to work out that this is at least 19.5% of people who have been deemed to meet the criteria by medical professionals that they are just going to cut off without a penny.
Another source (which I will also locate the link for everyone's perusal) has found that the budget for DLA when it was introduced is directly comparable to the budget for DLA today - taking into account the value of the £ 18 years ago and today it really isn't costing any more than when it was introduced.
The Welfare State may need reform, but I don't think targetting disability benefits is the answer.
Now, I'll brb with those links.