Echt:
RE: "And please don't tell me what I'm thinking, you're not a mind reader - stick to what I say. "
This is neither a court of law nor a university tutorial. A discussion board such as this one, particularly when dealing with domestic and emotional issues, invites the reading of minds. Your post illustrates how you, too, have been mindreading and extrapolating:
e.g.
in response to being asked why other posters felt the OP's dd1 was "cutting her out", you responded:
^Try "she didn't really have an answer". And the OP's unhappy speculations in the face of no answer.
And if that doesn't fit, consider the fact that the DD wants her mum to look after the baby when she goes back to work.^
I feel there is adequate text here for me to draw an inference here, and to apply language to that inference that makes sense to me. If you want less reading of subtext in your posts, you could add more detail to direct other posters in their thinking. In your post above, you mention the clarity of the OP's dd1's communication with her mum relating to a) her future childcare arrangements and b) who she would like present at the birth, as a reason for "metaphorically raised eyebrows" despite knowing nothing of the detail or context of either of those discussions. You are reading between the lines, as did I.
Words, words, words: they're all we have to go on. In your words and their placement relative to the words of other posters, I read a judgement of the OP's dd1 which I responded to.
I don't think the disparity in the manner of the OP's dd1's communication regarding two separate issues means very much at all. I don't think we can possibly read anything into it given that we don't know anything about the dynamic of the OP's relationship with her daughter or, for that matter, the internal dynamic of the OP's dd1 relating to the imminent birth.
However, we will project and intepret based on the words we read; post responses that are reformulations of our own thoughts and experiences and, to strip it down, attempt to read minds. None of it is objectively true in any real sense. So I make no apologies for not sticking to your words or reading your mind. The board (and most human intercourse) wouldn't get far without it.