Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Relations between China and the UK

215 replies

LittleFingerStrength · 14/03/2023 12:30

If there is a thread on this already I apologise.

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11857821/China-warns-AUKUS-deal-going-dangerous-path.html

There has been talk for a very long time, so it's no surprise. I understand we will be at war with them in possibly 18 plus months.

I gather we obtain a lot of pharma drugs from India.

I don't know a great deal about trade with China and who they can control trade with us if at war.

I understand they are in BRICS so those countries loyalty is likely to China.

What can be done on a personal level to deal with the potential changes in trade?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
LittleFingerStrength · 20/03/2023 13:28

It's going to be an interesting week.

The Irish enslaved the British - one was St Patrick, later the Irish were enslaved by the British.

Every country enslaved others throughout history, people cherry pick the bits that suit and ignore the bits that don't.

Various people even within countries have Various ideologies and each wants their own utopia.

OP posts:
LittleFingerStrength · 20/03/2023 22:25

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11883217/Biden-signs-law-requiring-intelligence-release-documents-COVID-origins.html

Why release documents on Covid and it's origins in China now?

OP posts:
Embelline · 20/03/2023 22:31

Genuinely confused, why is the OP so sure we are going to be at war with China in 18 months...just the UK?

treneton · 21/03/2023 07:44

I've no idea, we won't be (at war) I'm certain of that. As to the status of diplomatic relations then I've genuinely no idea. Xi is playing a long game here, and he has no reason not to continue that strategy. William Hague has a very good article in the Times in which he urges on us a more engaged foreign policy of development with the global south. He offers wise and sage counsel whether we are capable of that with a diminished place in the world particularly post Brexit and the prospects of a changing of the guard in the US remains to be seen.

www.thetimes.co.uk/article/west-can-stop-the-world-falling-for-xi-and-putin-hzkwlcfh3

According to polling last autumn, 87 per cent of the 1.2 billion people who live in liberal democracies held a negative view of Russia; 75 per cent also thought negatively of China. But the two dictators meeting this week are playing to a different audience: the views of the more than 6 billion people who live outside our democracies are the exact opposite. Months into Moscow’s murderous war, large majorities thought positively of Russia in south Asia (75 per cent), Francophone Africa (68 per cent) and southeast Asia (62 per cent). What has become known as the global south, including many increasingly important and populous states, just doesn’t think our way.

To us this can seem so irrational that it’s hard to accept. And we console ourselves that 141 countries have voted in the UN to condemn Russian aggression. But only about 40 of those have done anything about it, with sanctions or assistance to Ukraine, and the abstentions included some of the world’s most consequential nations. India’s prime minister, Narendra Modi, has said it is not a time for war, but his country has stepped up purchases of Russian oil. President Lula of Brazil has said it takes two to fight. South Africa has hosted exercises with Russian warships.

We have to adjust to the idea that most of the world does not see things our way. As China builds diplomatic prestige in the Middle East through bringing Saudi Arabia and Iran closer, and expands its list of client states in Africa, Asia and Latin America with grants and loans — no questions asked — the West will need to guard against the danger of being globally outmanoeuvred. It is entirely possible that our values will ultimately triumph in Ukraine, and we should fervently hope so. But we might then find that our interests are under threat across much of the rest of the world.

Southwestten · 21/03/2023 08:13

We have to adjust to the idea that most of the world does not see things our way.

You can say that again!

LittleFingerStrength · 21/03/2023 10:11

Embelline · 20/03/2023 22:31

Genuinely confused, why is the OP so sure we are going to be at war with China in 18 months...just the UK?

Why waste your time strawman and being disingenuous? I never said just with the UK only.

www.theguardian.com/world/2022/nov/09/xi-jinping-tells-chinas-army-to-focus-on-preparation-for-war

OP posts:
LittleFingerStrength · 21/03/2023 15:26

https://news.sky.com/story/ukraine-war-latest-signs-russia-has-asked-china-for-lethal-weapons-as-putin-and-xi-to-make-statements-12541713

NATO believes Moscow has asked Beijing for lethal aid in its war in Ukraine.

Jens Stoltenberg, its secretary-general, said the alliance warned China against supplying lethal weapons to Russia as Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin meet in Moscow for talks.

"We haven't seen any proof that China is delivering lethal weapons to Russia but we have seen some signs that this has been a request from Russia, and that this is an issue that is considered in Beijing by the Chinese authorities," Mr Stoltenberg told reporters in Brussels.

"China should not provide lethal aid to Russia, that would be to support an illegal war."

The former Norwegian PM made the remarks as he delivered his annual report on NATO's work.

Ukraine war - latest: 'Signs' Russia has asked China for lethal weapons - as Putin and Xi to make statements

Chinese President Xi Jinping will hold official talks with Vladimir Putin in Moscow, with public statements from the pair this afternoon.

https://news.sky.com/story/ukraine-war-latest-signs-russia-has-asked-china-for-lethal-weapons-as-putin-and-xi-to-make-statements-12541713

OP posts:
LittleFingerStrength · 21/03/2023 15:29

The Institute for the Study of War (ISW) says while Mr Putin argued Russia and China are building towards a "multipolar world order" against domination by the West, the Chinese president's approach was less forceful - indicating that the order would not specifically against a confrontational West.

"Xi instead focused heavily on presenting China as a viable third-party mediator to the war in Ukraine", said the ISW - a less aggressive rhetoric than Mr Putin was likely looking for.

The thinktank says Mr Xi's hesitance to explicitly Mr Putin as he rages against the West is a "notable departure" from Beijing's previously declared "no limits partnership" with Moscow.

"Xi's rhetoric suggests that he is not inclined to fully give Russia the economic and political support that Russia needs to reverse setbacks in Ukraine," it added.

The ISW predicts Mr Xi is likely to offer a "more concrete proposal" on negotiating an end to the war in Ukraine but it's "unclear" what it will entail - or how the Kremlin will receive it.

The possibility of China supplying Russia with military support is also unclear, it said.

OP posts:
Embelline · 21/03/2023 17:07

@LittleFingerStrength i wasn’t being that way at all I was genuinely asking as I didn’t understand a lot of posts on the thread. But please do go ahead and insult people who are showing interest in your post and threads.

Chinawall · 22/03/2023 10:46

So glad to have found this thread. I have been concerned about China for a while.

SerendipityJane · 22/03/2023 10:54

My last comment - the people of China don’t want war any more than we do.

My only contribution to this discussion is to note that a singular feature of all Western democracies is the number of wars they get involved in that the people "didn't want". Vietnam and Iraq/Afghanistan[1] spring to mind. To the extent that you have to question what definition of "democracy" is being used.

[1] For both the west and USSR.

ArseInTheCoOpWindow · 22/03/2023 11:30

SerendipityJane · 22/03/2023 10:54

My last comment - the people of China don’t want war any more than we do.

My only contribution to this discussion is to note that a singular feature of all Western democracies is the number of wars they get involved in that the people "didn't want". Vietnam and Iraq/Afghanistan[1] spring to mind. To the extent that you have to question what definition of "democracy" is being used.

[1] For both the west and USSR.

That’s a very significant comment. I totally agree with it. Amazing insight!

LittleFingerStrength · 22/03/2023 11:34

Xi had interesting body language in his closing press conference with Putin. China is the superpower in the room and what was said had been agreed between them - I presume.

Depleted Uranium shells some say are safe and others say aren't, Ukraine are happy to have this on their land used by their Amy.

Chinese in the audience are wearing masks.

OP posts:
LittleFingerStrength · 22/03/2023 11:36

ArseInTheCoOpWindow · 22/03/2023 11:30

That’s a very significant comment. I totally agree with it. Amazing insight!

Our side keeps losing wars, even pulling out of Afghanistan was a disaster.

OP posts:
LittleFingerStrength · 22/03/2023 11:49

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11889045/Democracy-Western-leaders-paving-way-autocrats-world-author-warns.html

All the glue themselves to the roads, men are women, get on your knee and animal worshipping, change society have helped China along with companies willing to employ slave labour to cut costs. It's nit easy to buy something China has had no part in making the components.

I don't think we will win a war with the BRICS nations, they want to destroy the petro dollar and ESG initiatives reducing pensions in the USA this week by Biden and employing the people silicone Valley did in risk management and Pip Bunce Woke ESG bankers has been a disaster. You can't tell these people with irrational luxury beliefs though, they get angry like on the other thread and tried to get a mob to join them.

Taiwan has fallen to China. The war lasted years, cost tens of thousands of lives, and ruined the economy - but that was a cost Xi Jinping was willing to pay to write his name into history
America fought back, but despite having the superior military there was simply too much political division at home and amongst its allies to put up a proper defence.

Xi doesn't have trans activists on Chinese Tic Tok, he has no dodgy sex education in schools there and he uses whatever cheap energy and Muslim slaves he likes, he even has party members move into the houses of the Muslims and monitor them very closely as he will the woke.

Author: Western leaders are paving the way for autocrats to take over

EXCLUSIVE: In his new book 'Defeating the Dictators', expert Charles Dunst warns that democracy is now in a fight with autocracy for control of the future, and is in danger of losing.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11889045/Democracy-Western-leaders-paving-way-autocrats-world-author-warns.html

OP posts:
Ozgirl75 · 22/03/2023 13:18

It’s an interesting point - in the past people looked at the eastern bloc and thought “no thanks” to long queues for shops which sold nothing of use, backwards societies where you weren’t allowed to leave. I’m only in my 40s and remember the stories coming out of Romania, Bulgaria etc.
But now I think people look at China and think, well, it looks quite good really. Ok, you’ll be arrested if you say the wrong thing but there are millions of people living comfortable lives in working cities, decked out in designer clothes etc and here I am in the U.K. with half the public services on strike, massive inflation and suddenly autocracy doesn’t look like the worst option.
Jinping has so far done a very careful and successful advertisement for a communist country in a way that I can’t think any other dictator has done in the past century.

MarshaBradyo · 22/03/2023 13:20

Hmm no thanks to people selling China

I mean I’m sure it has good points, and I had a very interesting time working for a HK based company and travelling to SE Asia

But no. If people want to move there go for it though.

Ozgirl75 · 22/03/2023 13:26

The point I’m making is that in comparison to dictatorships of the past, Jinping is doing a very careful attempt at not seeming like an absolute tyrant.
I have no desire to live in a society like China, but I read an article recently that said the worse the west gets, especially in relation to wealth discrepancies, the more people are slightly prepared to look favourably on an autocratic leader - mainly just to get shit done.

ScoobyBooby · 22/03/2023 13:33

Ozgirl75 · 15/03/2023 18:50

The world won’t go to war over Taiwan. China will probably take it over and the rest of the world will come to an agreement because actually no one wants war, especially China, whose entire economy is based on selling things to the west.

I agree with you .

Even though all this talk of war and so much unrest makes me anxious for the future!

LittleFingerStrength · 22/03/2023 13:35

Ozgirl75 · 22/03/2023 13:26

The point I’m making is that in comparison to dictatorships of the past, Jinping is doing a very careful attempt at not seeming like an absolute tyrant.
I have no desire to live in a society like China, but I read an article recently that said the worse the west gets, especially in relation to wealth discrepancies, the more people are slightly prepared to look favourably on an autocratic leader - mainly just to get shit done.

Yes many including those the Triggernometry lads interviewed said that we are headed for a Strong man character to deal with Wokesrers and other countries.

OP posts:
LittleFingerStrength · 22/03/2023 13:36

ScoobyBooby · 22/03/2023 13:33

I agree with you .

Even though all this talk of war and so much unrest makes me anxious for the future!

The old boss will be like the new boss, exploitative, hypocritical, corrupt and personality disordered.

OP posts:
LittleFingerStrength · 22/03/2023 13:42

From what I understand about the Uyghur Muslims, they have their phones, homes monitored and there are regular facial recognition posts monitoring them.

I would think as long as you aren't woke or of certain beliefs and lifestyles you will be OKish initially as they will be the targets - until some type of four pest policy is implemented.

OP posts:
ScoobyBooby · 22/03/2023 13:44

LittleFingerStrength · 22/03/2023 13:36

The old boss will be like the new boss, exploitative, hypocritical, corrupt and personality disordered.

So true x

Ozgirl75 · 22/03/2023 13:44

When you have demonstrators gluing themselves to the road and holding up hundreds of people, it’s easy to see why people think “god it would be handy to not have to be nice to these people but just fling them in jail”

But the fundamental part of a democratic society is that you have to tolerate the bits you don’t like and the bits that don’t go in your favour.

The social contract that we used to have in the west seemed to understand this - we tolerated things we didn’t like, because they weren’t THAT bad, and people didn’t do really annoying things with “democracy” on their side as they didn’t want to upset the social contract or test the boundaries of tolerance TOO hard.

But our support for democracy was based on the “fact” that life was overall better for the majority of people under a democratic system. I’m not sure that over the past 10-15 years that has held up, which then allows people to start questioning whether lib democracies are the best way to provide the best life for the most people.

LittleFingerStrength · 22/03/2023 13:54

Ozgirl75 · 22/03/2023 13:44

When you have demonstrators gluing themselves to the road and holding up hundreds of people, it’s easy to see why people think “god it would be handy to not have to be nice to these people but just fling them in jail”

But the fundamental part of a democratic society is that you have to tolerate the bits you don’t like and the bits that don’t go in your favour.

The social contract that we used to have in the west seemed to understand this - we tolerated things we didn’t like, because they weren’t THAT bad, and people didn’t do really annoying things with “democracy” on their side as they didn’t want to upset the social contract or test the boundaries of tolerance TOO hard.

But our support for democracy was based on the “fact” that life was overall better for the majority of people under a democratic system. I’m not sure that over the past 10-15 years that has held up, which then allows people to start questioning whether lib democracies are the best way to provide the best life for the most people.

The smartest move was not allowing Jeffrey Marsh types on Chinese Tic Tok and allowing it in the West.

We understand that separating children from parents, removing PR means children aren't protected. The NHS and our education system are now very political as are the private sector.

Trauma like CSA can cause personality disorders, the personality disordered can then be used as a army.

OP posts: