Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

How do we ACTUALLY solve the rift between dog people and non-dog people?

537 replies

Talkingtomyhouseplants · 08/08/2026 12:52

Inspired by yet another dog thread where all the SAME arguments are trotted out again and again:

The Pro Dog People say:

  • The dog is my family, you need to treat it like family
  • Why would I get a dog just to leave it at home?
  • It’s just a dog, it’s not bothering anyone
  • My dog is less annoying than your child
  • I love my dog more than I love people
  • The dogs are ALLOWED to be there so it’s okay that I bring them places
  • If my dog isn’t invited, I would probably choose to stay home as I prefer most dogs to people anyway
  • My house is my dog’s home too, I won’t be shutting it away for anyone
  • My dog isn’t dangerous - he’s a bit softy.

The Anti Dog People Say

  • I’m allergic/scared/don’t like being around them - please keep them away from me
  • It’s a pet, not your family
  • A dog is not a child
  • I won’t have dogs in my house
  • Dogs are dirty and unhygienic - they shouldn’t be in shops or places where you eat
  • I’m sick of dogs barking and jumping up at me in public and I keep stepping in dog poo
  • There are too many places that either actively allow dogs, or more often don’t challenge people who bring them anyway so dogs eventually become allowed
  • Dog owners are entitled and pushy and this is why they are now suddenly everywhere
  • It’s dangerous to have dogs around children
  • Dogs can bite/kill people
  • There are too many untrained dogs who are treated like people

Same arguments on both sides, every time.

In my personal life I can think of at least two situations where these opposing views are creating real rifts in families because the dog person wants to bring a dog, and the non-dog person doesn’t want to be around said dog. I can feel it becoming more polarising in society generally, anti dog people are more vocal about being anti dog and pro dog people are more pushy about full inclusion of dogs in human spaces.

So what is the actual solution?

OP posts:
YeOldeGreyhound · 09/08/2026 22:02

Talkingtomyhouseplants · 09/08/2026 21:59

I don’t think so - just from a pure taking up space point of view with a lot of them in small cafes it’s inappropriate. Then some breeds are more intimidating, and more dangerous

Not all cafes are small.
I have never seen a cafe or any dog friendly place say only small dogs are allowed.
From my own observations, it is the small dogs that are very yappy and jump up. The big dogs tend to lay down and have a snooze.

MNLurker1345 · 09/08/2026 22:11

Talkingtomyhouseplants · 09/08/2026 22:00

Oh no they have a golden retriever…which is inappropriate in a cafe but for completely different reasons (won’t sit still)

Yes, they are quite imposing dogs. They are
a good size. They shed hair and are drooly, they have a presence, hence your position, “keep that dog away from me and my family”.

CJones80 · 10/08/2026 16:12

Dontevenlookatme · 08/08/2026 12:57

The default position is no dog. And I say that as someone who does like dogs and enjoys them being around. But they are an indulgence and shouldn’t be inflicted on anybody who doesn’t share the love.

I agree, you wouldn't want to force people who don't like dogs to take care of them- some people only value animals for sustenance not as living, feeling beings walking the earth, you can't guarantee they would treat them well as part of the Household. And honestly I really think it's just a matter of preference and personal experiences, dogs don't exist in the first place to be our pets, we shouldn't push having one to people.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

Talkingtomyhouseplants · 10/08/2026 16:17

CJones80 · 10/08/2026 16:12

I agree, you wouldn't want to force people who don't like dogs to take care of them- some people only value animals for sustenance not as living, feeling beings walking the earth, you can't guarantee they would treat them well as part of the Household. And honestly I really think it's just a matter of preference and personal experiences, dogs don't exist in the first place to be our pets, we shouldn't push having one to people.

Don’t dogs as we know them in 2026 ONLY exist to be pets? They aren’t a naturally occurring species

OP posts:
Orangebadger · 10/08/2026 21:28

Greedybilly · 09/08/2026 21:56

So the rift healing seems to be going well then.

🤣🤣🤣

YeOldeGreyhound · 11/08/2026 15:00

Talkingtomyhouseplants · 10/08/2026 16:17

Don’t dogs as we know them in 2026 ONLY exist to be pets? They aren’t a naturally occurring species

No, some dogs have jobs.
I met a spaniel with a police officer in the vets. The dog was a "tech dog". They are trained to sniff out things like mobile phones and sim cards.

Sadly, some dogs are bred just to be experimented on, or raced.

Talkingtomyhouseplants · 11/08/2026 15:08

YeOldeGreyhound · 11/08/2026 15:00

No, some dogs have jobs.
I met a spaniel with a police officer in the vets. The dog was a "tech dog". They are trained to sniff out things like mobile phones and sim cards.

Sadly, some dogs are bred just to be experimented on, or raced.

Sure but I don’t think any of the dogs that bother people are working dogs - I think most people agree they are useful.

OP posts:
YeOldeGreyhound · 11/08/2026 15:16

Talkingtomyhouseplants · 11/08/2026 15:08

Sure but I don’t think any of the dogs that bother people are working dogs - I think most people agree they are useful.

Does it matter? If a dog is bothering you, as in properly bothering you and not just existing, then that is an owner problem and not a dog one.
No responsible owner would let their dog bother anyone.

MaturingCheeseball · 11/08/2026 16:06

drspouse · 09/08/2026 13:16

People need to eat though, and if we've gone on a bike ride which only passes one cafe, and forgotten to bring lunch, it's starve, or eat at the cafe.

You do sound a bit of a pain. Dogs at work? Not many offices. Dogs in schools? Usually in the school office and not roaming from classroom to classroom or rampaging round the playground. And as for cafes which you might pass on a bike ride? Presumably that’s in a walking area and so, as a pp observed, it’s necessary to accommodate them to drum up business.

Actually let’s generalise and I’ll say I don’t like bike riders much. Sweaty-arsed men blocking roads, or couples wobbling along two abreast on hired bikes, or families taking up entire path. In fact I was on a country walk and this woman shouted at me to “Get off the path!” as apparently “Cyclists take precedence over walkers and dogs!” I don’t think they do, mate.

Orangebadger · 11/08/2026 19:26

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

PrettyLittleRose · 12/08/2026 07:48

YeOldeGreyhound · 11/08/2026 15:16

Does it matter? If a dog is bothering you, as in properly bothering you and not just existing, then that is an owner problem and not a dog one.
No responsible owner would let their dog bother anyone.

Exactly. And the good dog owners don't let their dog bother anyone. Sadly there is a certain type of entitled dog owner who doesn't give a stuff if their dog is bothering anyone else, jumping up them, running at them, barking at them, scaring them, and scaring their smaller (or even not smaller) dogs. And then they blame everyone else but themselves. Some dog owners are fine, and the badly behaved dogs are like this because of the owners. I would never blame the dog,

fivepenny · 14/08/2026 12:57

I don't hate dogs although I wouldn't have one myself but I do really dislike people who have dogs and don't train them properly, don't exercise them or socialise them properly, who buy dogs from dodgy breeders and end up with dogs who have issues. People who get a dog them dump them at shelters when they can't be bothered anymore, who get a dog when they know they will be out all day so that the dogs is under stimulated and anxious. People have dogs but let them endlessly bark and shit everywhere without picking it up or who through selecting the wrong breed or poor training and care have a reactive dog they can't control.

Essentially if people are good dog owners who actually put in the work to train and care for their pet, who respect that not everyone finds their dog's antics charming then its fine. My uncles had dogs who were trained as gun dogs and those dogs were impeccable and lovely animals. I'm a vegetarian who doesn't approve of hunting but it seemed to me that working dogs are usually so much happier and well adjusted than the average family dog many of whom seem plagued with neuroses.

I can cope with a dog friendly café if the dogs are well behaved but often this isn't the case.

Essentially my point is if you choose to have a dog the onus is entirely on you as the dog owner to ensure your dog isn't causing problems or distress to other people. The issue is that many people who just aren't able or willing to take that kind of responsibility still buy dogs on a whim for what they get out of it rather than doing what is best for the animal.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread