Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Thread gallery
12
Pippilongstocking2 · 01/05/2026 19:18

Itsmetheflamingo · 01/05/2026 18:56

The comments can’t prejudice an ongoing case. We know bugger all about it. People discussing a case doesn’t prejudice it

Exactly - how silly “take it down”

lovealieinortwo · 01/05/2026 19:19

They took down the other thread

ScaredButUnavoidable · 01/05/2026 19:21

Pippilongstocking2 · 01/05/2026 19:08

No idea but it isn’t innocent on her part

I wonder if it will come out that she has a history of possible seizure like events (strange episodes, not convulsive seizures) that she didn’t report to her GP and so weren’t investigated.

I can’t see how she can be held criminally responsible for the accident unless this were the case.

However, that would mean they would have to prove that she knew her episodes were potentially epileptic in nature and that she purposefully chose not to go to her GP as she knew there was a risk she may lose her licence.

But how do you prove that?

There’s something suspicious about it though because if it was as black and white as this was just her first seizure then she wouldn’t be at fault, but the fact shes being charged with dangerous driving means there’s a lot more to it than just that.

Pippilongstocking2 · 01/05/2026 19:25

ScaredButUnavoidable · 01/05/2026 19:21

I wonder if it will come out that she has a history of possible seizure like events (strange episodes, not convulsive seizures) that she didn’t report to her GP and so weren’t investigated.

I can’t see how she can be held criminally responsible for the accident unless this were the case.

However, that would mean they would have to prove that she knew her episodes were potentially epileptic in nature and that she purposefully chose not to go to her GP as she knew there was a risk she may lose her licence.

But how do you prove that?

There’s something suspicious about it though because if it was as black and white as this was just her first seizure then she wouldn’t be at fault, but the fact shes being charged with dangerous driving means there’s a lot more to it than just that.

Thank you - someone with some sense

it could be nothing to do with seizures and she could have been driving below standard

we won’t know none knows till the case

Pippilongstocking2 · 01/05/2026 19:26

placemats · 01/05/2026 18:57

This.

Stop being busybodies

it’s ok to discuss our views on developing topical news

I don’t think mumsnet is gonna crack the case

nobody knows what the case is

IdentifyingAsAWoollyMammoth · 01/05/2026 19:38

Pippilongstocking2 · 01/05/2026 19:10

And how did they know they’d had a TIA?

@Pippilongstocking2 because they were taken to hospital where they received ECG and an MRI. Then monitored for 48 hours as they can be a precursor to a full stroke.

Itsmetheflamingo · 01/05/2026 19:47

lovealieinortwo · 01/05/2026 19:19

They took down the other thread

Maybe they’ve been a bit dim

placemats · 01/05/2026 19:50

Pippilongstocking2 · 01/05/2026 19:26

Stop being busybodies

it’s ok to discuss our views on developing topical news

I don’t think mumsnet is gonna crack the case

nobody knows what the case is

And yet here is you being a busy body and telling off others.

Pippilongstocking2 · 01/05/2026 19:54

IdentifyingAsAWoollyMammoth · 01/05/2026 19:38

@Pippilongstocking2 because they were taken to hospital where they received ECG and an MRI. Then monitored for 48 hours as they can be a precursor to a full stroke.

Yes exactly!

Pippilongstocking2 · 01/05/2026 19:56

placemats · 01/05/2026 19:50

And yet here is you being a busy body and telling off others.

How I’m telling off others

im not telling anyone what to do, just you, to stop trying to shut down our discussion of the news of the day

leave the thread if yoi don’t want to discuss

Pippilongstocking2 · 01/05/2026 19:57

Allisnotlost1 · 01/05/2026 19:52

https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/transient-ischaemic-attack-tia/diagnosis/

Not always visible on scans so often a process of differential diagnosis.

I know this

my point was to show it can be detected afterward

igelkott2026 · 01/05/2026 20:01

Pippilongstocking2 · 01/05/2026 18:40

We have a responsibility to not let these 80mph tractors on our roads simply to satisfy the ego of people who have the money to afford them

or the greed of the car manufacturers who see £ signs with the bigger cars.

Much more money in selling a hulking SUV than a Toyota Yaris, for example.

igelkott2026 · 01/05/2026 20:03

User122333 · 01/05/2026 18:42

Why is this thread still up now that she has been charged and comments could prejudice the ongoing case? A thread was withdrawn earlier today for this precise reason.

How would the comments on here prejudice the case? it has been thoroughly reported on in the news!

JulietteHasAGun · 01/05/2026 20:05

Pippilongstocking2 · 01/05/2026 18:33

Why is she the charged with death by dangerous driving???

Well there certainly seems to be rumours that she’d had some sort of episodes before. But definitely did not have an epilepsy diagnosis as that would be provable.

I do wonder if she had previously had some mild absence type seizures and not realised they could be epilepsy. Potentially mentioned them to friends/other school mums that she sometimes “zoned out” or similar. Potentially they’ve now told the police this. And if she hadn’t sought medical advice then have they now decided that reaches the threshold?

Obviously this is all conjecture but it would make all the pieces in the puzzle fit.

Allisnotlost1 · 01/05/2026 20:06

Pippilongstocking2 · 01/05/2026 19:57

I know this

my point was to show it can be detected afterward

If you ‘know this’ then you’ll also know that small lesions can’t always be detected afterwards, and diagnosis is often a process of elimination. Many TIAs missed or misdiagnosed, and many that are diagnosed are cryptogenic and/or don’t show up on ECGs or MRIs.

Pippilongstocking2 · 01/05/2026 20:08

igelkott2026 · 01/05/2026 20:03

How would the comments on here prejudice the case? it has been thoroughly reported on in the news!

And no one knows what the case is!

Pippilongstocking2 · 01/05/2026 20:08

Allisnotlost1 · 01/05/2026 20:06

If you ‘know this’ then you’ll also know that small lesions can’t always be detected afterwards, and diagnosis is often a process of elimination. Many TIAs missed or misdiagnosed, and many that are diagnosed are cryptogenic and/or don’t show up on ECGs or MRIs.

It was a general point

Pippilongstocking2 · 01/05/2026 20:10

JulietteHasAGun · 01/05/2026 20:05

Well there certainly seems to be rumours that she’d had some sort of episodes before. But definitely did not have an epilepsy diagnosis as that would be provable.

I do wonder if she had previously had some mild absence type seizures and not realised they could be epilepsy. Potentially mentioned them to friends/other school mums that she sometimes “zoned out” or similar. Potentially they’ve now told the police this. And if she hadn’t sought medical advice then have they now decided that reaches the threshold?

Obviously this is all conjecture but it would make all the pieces in the puzzle fit.

Or she could have just been driving below standard

I reckon she’s been caught in a lie

Trampoline · 01/05/2026 20:14

Monty36 · 01/05/2026 18:33

I am not being disrespectful to point out that there are other potential causes for someone being unconscious at the wheel of a car.

And nobody yet knows why or what actually happened. Or what, if any, diagnosis she may have or what may have occurred.

I have not been disrespectful to point out TIA’s are similar to seizures. It is a fact.

Do not confuse the fact I am doing so with a lack of sentiment and sadness about the death of the children.

Apparently, she got out of the car after the incident, after driving a distance which must have taken less then 1 minute. So, this unconscious period you are referring to must have been very short indeed. But yes, a momentary blackout could have caused this - if indeed there was a blackout.

Pippilongstocking2 · 01/05/2026 20:17

Trampoline · 01/05/2026 20:14

Apparently, she got out of the car after the incident, after driving a distance which must have taken less then 1 minute. So, this unconscious period you are referring to must have been very short indeed. But yes, a momentary blackout could have caused this - if indeed there was a blackout.

I’m surprised you know that as apparently the scene was utter chaos

Allisnotlost1 · 01/05/2026 20:24

Pippilongstocking2 · 01/05/2026 20:08

It was a general point

Edited

A general point that is incorrect and irrelevant, since there has never been a claim that the driver had a TIA.

GarlicMind · 01/05/2026 20:29

StabiaGirl · 14/04/2026 14:50

Everytime I see one of those tank-like Land Rovers I start the same conversation with DH: "Will those families ever get justice?"

The driver knew that she was epileptic; she stated she was in an unrelated published article that predated the Wimbledon incident. Presumably not disclosed to her insurers so compensation claims would revert to her personally. Essentially, we're talking bankruptcy. Her lawyer's website boasted that he could "make your problems go away" so I guess she and her husband took the pragmatic approach of paying X number of millions to someone who had the wherewithal to bribe, blackmail and bludgeon law enforcement into silence.

It stinks to high heaven and "racist officers" is nothing but a red herring.

Edited

All of this. Freemantle has Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome, a severe form of epilepsy presenting with multiple types of seizure. It's unknown whether she was legal to drive - if she'd been seizure-free for a year or more, she may have declared it and been cleared. But she may never have declared it.

A 'pillar of the community type', she's served on the boards of several schools including The Study.

The suspicion is that officers may have been over-eager to support this middle-class white woman, who had accidentally killed two brown children.

Having a medical emergency while driving isn't a crime, though failing to declare a condition to the DVLA is.

AlecTrevelyan006 · 01/05/2026 20:29

average weight of a land rover is between 2,300 kg and 2,800 kg (approx 5,000–6,200 lbs)
average weight of a mini cooper is between approx. 1,225–1,770 (approx 2,700-3,900 lbs)

does this make a difference in an accident? the short answer is yes

https://findingspress.org/article/141647-do-sports-utility-vehicles-suvs-cause-more-severe-injuries-to-pedestrians-and-cyclists-than-passenger-cars-in-the-case-of-a-crash-findings-from-gr

We conclude that in Great Britain, being hit by an SUV as opposed to a passenger car increases injury severity among pedestrians and cyclists, with the strongest effect in children. This effect is well-captured by the dimensions of weight and height, but not by length.

Do Sports Utility Vehicles (SUVs) Cause More Severe Injuries to Pedestrians and Cyclists than Passenger Cars, in the Case of a Crash? Findings from Great Britain, 2004-2023 | Published in Findings

By Anna Goodman, Phil Edwards & 1 more. In Great Britain, road crashes involving SUVs cause more severe injuries to pedestrians and cyclists than crashes involving passenger cars. The effect is stronger in children, especially young children.

https://findingspress.org/article/141647-do-sports-utility-vehicles-suvs-cause-more-severe-injuries-to-pedestrians-and-cyclists-than-passenger-cars-in-the-case-of-a-crash-findings-from-gr

Pippilongstocking2 · 01/05/2026 20:31

Allisnotlost1 · 01/05/2026 20:24

A general point that is incorrect and irrelevant, since there has never been a claim that the driver had a TIA.

it was a general point that everyone mentioning TIAs it’s generally detectable after

Swipe left for the next trending thread