Huntingdon was a lone wolf attack

[WeCouldBeNiceToEachOther]

Confirmed by police about half an hour ago that the 35 year old arrested has been released without charge.

In that post, how? Can you be specific

And I know what I meant when I answered, which I stated below. I know my own thoughts which were about SM v attacks.

"Uncontrolled immigration" refers to immigration that is not managed by government control, leading to both legal and illegal migration that is higher than a desired level. This can include a surge in both legal migration and unauthorized border crossings, such as individuals arriving without permission or by circumventing official channels.”

Every day is a school day, Dunc

It was about SM stoking violence. So they are linked. It’s not worry about SM, it’s worry about its specific influence in stoking violence.
Im noticing a theme with your responses to criticism. You express concern about terminology or divert onto a side issue. Think I’ll remember to avoid discussion with you - no point when someone isn’t responding in good faith really.

As I said I know what I was thinking when I posted.

You have your views and thinking I assume. You can summarise for yourself but not others.

They all related to immigration. The attacker wasn’t an I migrant this time. You were using the attack to further your views on immigration.

And can you be specific on this? The still in bold part.

You were told that the 90% figure was incorrect (it’s actually 80%) and that the figure for Islamist terrorist attacks was 67%. Not so much of a difference now is there. It’s also interesting to note that of the non-Islamist attacks, none have been mass casualty events. Some haven’t had any casualties whatsoever. So all mass casualties events in the past 20 years have been Islamist. Added to the fact that there have been multiple mass casualty Islamist attacks across Europe, it’s not difficult to see why people are fearful.

Can you tell me which immigration is not controlled by the government?

Shifting the goal posts then? At the time people were declaring it must be Islamist terrorism we didn’t know the race if the attackers. Plus of course more Islamist terrorists are Muslim (and therefore majority non-white) than other sorts of terrorists.

It is stressful. I find thinking of Southport still very upsetting and just the trauma of it.

We’re all posting in relation to an extreme situation, I think of what it would be like and it’s awful. Sometimes I see posts that I find difficult in that context.

No I’m not as concerned about people posting things as I would be on a train in that situation
The post was about immigration, not the train. I don’t think your reading comprehension is poor, therefore the only reason to mix those up are if you still think they are basically the same issue.
And that’s the last question of yours I’m responding to.

What is your point? Most mass atrocities are jihadis nowadays. This one wasn't but it is absolutely understandable to think it may be as they usually are.

It isn't personal to the jihadis it is based in what has happened in recent years.

Is that because some things haven’t been treated as terror attacks, though? I mean, this sounds quite similar to a terror attack (as did Axel Rudakabana tbf - may not technically have been a terror attack but was reported on in a very similar way)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plymouth_shooting

They were all about the increased risk of male violence when tens of thousand of undocumented men arrive in small towns.

No I’m saying what two things I’m thinking of. I don’t get the immigration post and it wasn’t in mind when I responded.

It’s not relevant to me, how people react to SM over attacks is, hence posts on that. I know how I feel of course.

I've no idea why people get so upset when some wonder if what sounds like a terrorist attack is a terrorist attack.

67%. Roughly 2/3rds. All atrocities are…well…atrocious. Nobody is minimising them. Just pointing out that it’s nit massively reasonable to jump to jihadi/islamist/whatever word some of you will accept terrorism every time there’s a violent incident, even before anyone confirms terrorism.

Many of the hotel shouters do have troublesome backgrounds with violence and domestic abuse indeed.

It’s not changing the goal posts to really analyse statistics and what they accurately represent.

We have a male violence problem. We don’t need more violent males.

The things not treated as terror attacks aren’t terror attacks, so why would they affect statistics?

Misogynistic mass murder should be classed as terrorism IMO

They don’t. They get upset when people assume it’s a terror attack, then further assume it’s Islamist and committed by an asylum seeker, then post a load of bike about asylum seekers, then move on to say black British people aren't as British as white British people.
You may not have done that. Therefore the upset isn't direct ed at you. Many did though.

The ones entering illegally? 😂😂😂

It is reasonable! If someone is mugged I don't presume it's a jihadi but when you hear of a mass attack it is normal to wonder nowadays. What is wrong with that??