Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Labour isn't working - Thread 14

1000 replies

TheNuthatch · 21/10/2025 08:54

A chat thread for those who don't like this Labour government.

The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.

Previous thread
https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/_chat/5427475-labour-isnt-working-thread-13?utm_campaign=thread&utm_medium=share

OP posts:
Thread gallery
42
TheNuthatch · 24/10/2025 12:11

I also heard on the radio that Labour are planning to expand the failing UK/France one-in one-out deal to include other countries, such as Belgium and the Netherlands. The so called Calais Group.

OP posts:
Upstartled · 24/10/2025 12:14

apples24 · 24/10/2025 12:02

The left and Reform.

I think Reform's financial policy isn't much more than throwing pasta at the wall and seeing what sticks.

Some of it seems left wing - three child policy, increase in departmental spending but lowering taxation and cutting people from worklessness benefits within four months or if they don't accept a job after two offers isn't from the left playbook.

I'm not sure where I'd place them.

Upstartled · 24/10/2025 12:15

TheNuthatch · 24/10/2025 12:11

I also heard on the radio that Labour are planning to expand the failing UK/France one-in one-out deal to include other countries, such as Belgium and the Netherlands. The so called Calais Group.

So we can all swap illegals and pretend this is a policy to reduce numbers?

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

Lutonsgirl · 24/10/2025 12:18

Just seen an "interview " on GB news with Christopher Hope and Lindsay Whittle. What I've taken from that is Mr Whittle is a bit of a twat. Basically blanked him.

Ed. Posted too soon

TheNuthatch · 24/10/2025 12:20

Upstartled · 24/10/2025 12:15

So we can all swap illegals and pretend this is a policy to reduce numbers?

Yes, and give them a wad of cash as they leave so that they can afford to get on the next dinghy. 🤯

OP posts:
DancingFerret · 24/10/2025 12:20

Rivalled · 24/10/2025 11:29

And the problem is, we’ve got huge numbers of non tax payers who reject the idea that things have to be paid for at all, or certainly that they have a part in paying for them. People who say it’s sad to get self esteem from work, they want bartering back, austerity is a political choice, they don’t care about the debt as they don’t think a default would be that bad, the markets are bad for the environment, they don’t believe in capitalism etc. scary times.

That, I think, sums up the mindset of many Labour voters (including the MN diehard types who occasionally cruise through here): "As long as my benefits keep appearing in my bank account, I don't care or have any interest in how they're funded."

Lutonsgirl · 24/10/2025 12:20

Why are we giving them cash when they leave ffs

TheNuthatch · 24/10/2025 12:23

Lutonsgirl · 24/10/2025 12:18

Just seen an "interview " on GB news with Christopher Hope and Lindsay Whittle. What I've taken from that is Mr Whittle is a bit of a twat. Basically blanked him.

Ed. Posted too soon

Edited

Nice. That's a good start. Perhaps that explains why it took him 14 attempts to get elected 😂

OP posts:
Lutonsgirl · 24/10/2025 12:27

Lol..didn't realise he had had that many attempts!

Rivalled · 24/10/2025 12:30

Oh we give them cash when they leave as it persuades them not to hold us up with court cases if they accept - it’s been going on for years as it’s efficient apparently

DenizenOfAisleOfShame · 24/10/2025 12:34

apples24 · 24/10/2025 12:02

The left and Reform.

I agree. Reform haven’t said anything very much about benefits reform and reduction. They are reformulating their economic policy now, but they are a populist party that appeals to the instincts of the left-behind white working class. Nothing wrong with that in itself but many of their voters are benefit recipients.

I do not believe Reform could do anything worthwhile about the economy.

DancingFerret · 24/10/2025 12:34

Lutonsgirl · 24/10/2025 12:18

Just seen an "interview " on GB news with Christopher Hope and Lindsay Whittle. What I've taken from that is Mr Whittle is a bit of a twat. Basically blanked him.

Ed. Posted too soon

Edited

Whittle doesn't come across as the brightest; some commentators are saying PC's policies are closely aligned with Labour, so perhaps the cheering needs to be scaled back.

Whatever, the result speaks volumes - and at first glance it appears the tool in Downing Street should be very worried by the election of the tool in Caerphilly.

EasternStandard · 24/10/2025 12:35

Upstartled · 24/10/2025 12:14

I think Reform's financial policy isn't much more than throwing pasta at the wall and seeing what sticks.

Some of it seems left wing - three child policy, increase in departmental spending but lowering taxation and cutting people from worklessness benefits within four months or if they don't accept a job after two offers isn't from the left playbook.

I'm not sure where I'd place them.

Edited

I think they’re a mix too, some tax changes are pretty big but there’s the benefit cap thing.

AbsentosaurusRex · 24/10/2025 12:38

Lutonsgirl · 24/10/2025 12:20

Why are we giving them cash when they leave ffs

Why are we giving them cash at all?

AbsentosaurusRex · 24/10/2025 12:40

TheNuthatch · 24/10/2025 12:23

Nice. That's a good start. Perhaps that explains why it took him 14 attempts to get elected 😂

😂😂 ..it would make sense.. Uh oh Wales, what’s to come in your future. Hint. Look at the fck up that is Scotland.

AbsentosaurusRex · 24/10/2025 12:41

DancingFerret · 24/10/2025 12:34

Whittle doesn't come across as the brightest; some commentators are saying PC's policies are closely aligned with Labour, so perhaps the cheering needs to be scaled back.

Whatever, the result speaks volumes - and at first glance it appears the tool in Downing Street should be very worried by the election of the tool in Caerphilly.

Whatever, the result speaks volumes - and at first glance it appears the tool in Downing Street should be very worried by the election of the tool in Caerphilly.

😂😂

TheNuthatch · 24/10/2025 13:08

AbsentosaurusRex · 24/10/2025 12:41

Whatever, the result speaks volumes - and at first glance it appears the tool in Downing Street should be very worried by the election of the tool in Caerphilly.

😂😂

😂😂

OP posts:
Upstartled · 24/10/2025 13:09

Hermer

Labour's Attorney General Lord Hermer has also submitted evidence to the same committee.
In it, he revealed he was informed on 3 September that prosecutors were dropping the case - but was told not to alert other ministers, including the prime minister.
Lord Hermer said he received routine updates from the CPS in August indicating the trial was expected to proceed.
But during a meeting on 3 September, DPP Parkinson confirmed the decision to drop the case.
Lord Hermer said at the DPP's request, he kept the information confidential until police and defendants were informed.
The attorney general said "there is nothing unusual" in the law officers "being requested to keep information about individual prosecution decisions confidential even from senior colleagues".

Nothing to see here Guv, Hermer was just keeping the PM in the dark because the dpp made him - might be more convincing if Ellie Reeves didn't declare yesterday that Doug Wilson, the director general of the office of Lord Hermer, was at a meeting (two days prior to the collapse of the case) where him and government officials discussed the diplomatic consequences of the Chinese spy trial.

TheNuthatch · 24/10/2025 13:17

Upstartled · 24/10/2025 13:09

Hermer

Labour's Attorney General Lord Hermer has also submitted evidence to the same committee.
In it, he revealed he was informed on 3 September that prosecutors were dropping the case - but was told not to alert other ministers, including the prime minister.
Lord Hermer said he received routine updates from the CPS in August indicating the trial was expected to proceed.
But during a meeting on 3 September, DPP Parkinson confirmed the decision to drop the case.
Lord Hermer said at the DPP's request, he kept the information confidential until police and defendants were informed.
The attorney general said "there is nothing unusual" in the law officers "being requested to keep information about individual prosecution decisions confidential even from senior colleagues".

Nothing to see here Guv, Hermer was just keeping the PM in the dark because the dpp made him - might be more convincing if Ellie Reeves didn't declare yesterday that Doug Wilson, the director general of the office of Lord Hermer, was at a meeting (two days prior to the collapse of the case) where him and government officials discussed the diplomatic consequences of the Chinese spy trial.

Edited

Eh? Why would he not tell the PM? Why would he be advised not to? That doesn't make any sense.
I smell 🐂💩 .

OP posts:
Upstartled · 24/10/2025 13:19

Because once the dpp had decided to close the case then he was sworn to secrecy before they told the people in the case - apparently this is true. Although you'd think there would be an exception for the PM 🤷🏼‍♀️

It's just complete coincidence his head honcho was in a meeting talking about the political fall out of the Chinese spy case two days earlier.

Nolletimiere · 24/10/2025 13:28

Rivalled · 24/10/2025 12:30

Oh we give them cash when they leave as it persuades them not to hold us up with court cases if they accept - it’s been going on for years as it’s efficient apparently

Which leads to the obvious solution - reform the court system/appeals process.

Which in itself is infested with the left wing, of course.

Rivalled · 24/10/2025 13:30

Think that’s what’s happened, a lot of fairly moderate people have seen in recent years our inability to get even convicted child abusers out of the country and the courts have lost support.

justasking111 · 24/10/2025 13:31

In Wales we've suckled at the state systems tit for three generations now when the mines went, labour didn't have a backup plan like the Irish. Labour didn't fight for any industry just let them fail. The latest big one being Port Talbot.

We had the Welsh development agency who wooed overseas investors, successfully , we had the Welsh tourist board who wooed overseas tourism again successfully. The Senedd swallowed them both up and shut them down.

Banging our drum business wise is an anathema to them. Westminster lost patience years ago and sidelined us as lazy grifters. And I don't blame them.

The only way for anyone to make money is to be on every benefit going and augment income using the black economy. Like Greece there's two prices for a lot of things. The market price and the cash backhander.

EasternStandard · 24/10/2025 13:33

Upstartled · 24/10/2025 11:56

And then the whole financial merry-go-round grinds more slowly and the social safety nets that were set in place to protect the most vulnerable in society are in frantic jeopardy.

The welfare state will shrink, it just won't be a controlled and sensible decline. It'll be hacked at frantically to stop the boat sinking.

Edited

Yes the same people keep saying more but I don’t think it’s doable.

I see the left of Labour are making noises after today, the Burnham lot.

I don’t mind more Labour wrangling, hopefully they’ll not last the whole term.

Rivalled · 24/10/2025 13:45

Latest political economy podcast says they see early signs of more trouble in the number 10 team. It’s not surprising given the state of things.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.