Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Baby Victoria verdict is in

228 replies

LetsGoRoundAgainAgain · 14/07/2025 14:37

Both found guilty of manslaughter.

Thank goodness.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
BabyCatFace · 15/07/2025 08:49

Lalgarh · 15/07/2025 08:31

Is Gordon's previous conviction in the US going to be a factor in his sentencing now?

I'm aware of one domestic violence murderer who served a sentence in the UK then moved back to new Zealand and offended again, but his previous crimes weren't taken into account BC not carried out in that country

No, why would it? He's already been sentenced for that crime and his sentencing now will be for this crime.

BlusteryLake · 15/07/2025 09:07

Both of them are an absolute disgrace. They prioritised their own toxic relationship over the welfare of their children.

CultureAlienationBoredomandDespair · 15/07/2025 09:16

BabyCatFace · 15/07/2025 08:49

No, why would it? He's already been sentenced for that crime and his sentencing now will be for this crime.

Yes but tbf your previous character is a factor when determining sentences. He’s been in prison before both abroad and in this country. He also was breaching his probation conditions when he went on the run. By contrast, Constance was of “previous good character”. So he may well get a longer sentence (though I doubt by much).

Lalgarh · 15/07/2025 09:50

Re that comment from the judge that he'd never been spoken to in the way this pair had behaved so in court.

Comment from elsewhere but a barrister was commenting that quite a lot of ppl in court get off convictions and guilty verdicts simply BC they carry themselves well and esp speak with a posh accent and demeanor. Marten probably thought she could carry on as per her ancestors and get this inconvenience over and done with. That's privileges for you.

Starpleked · 15/07/2025 09:51

Lalgarh · 15/07/2025 09:50

Re that comment from the judge that he'd never been spoken to in the way this pair had behaved so in court.

Comment from elsewhere but a barrister was commenting that quite a lot of ppl in court get off convictions and guilty verdicts simply BC they carry themselves well and esp speak with a posh accent and demeanor. Marten probably thought she could carry on as per her ancestors and get this inconvenience over and done with. That's privileges for you.

Surely by that logic she'd do the opposite of what she did and deploy her posh accent and play up her background?

LetsGoRoundAgainAgain · 15/07/2025 09:57

It seems like she did:

"I'm extremely tired and I am irate that this word 'deliberate' keeps being expounded in this courtroom," she said.

She had no hesitation in trying to look educated.

Asking the judge if she could 'nip out for a coffee because we're falling asleep here'

It's absolutely mind-blowing.

OP posts:
Lalgarh · 15/07/2025 10:10

Lady muck.

Still, British aristocrats being ferociously screwed up isn't exactly a revelation to anyone familiar with Brideshead Revisited, Patrick Melrose, Saltburn or even Withnail

Summerinthecity25 · 15/07/2025 10:36

This isn’t about the verdict but something I noticed in some of the cctv images. Marten was carrying the baby in her coat but the coat was completely done up. How could the baby breathe?

I know lots of their actions showed they could not care for a baby safely and that’s why the baby died but the coat thing struck me yesterday as something so basic and odd and unsafe. No one would carry a baby like that.

LetsGoRoundAgainAgain · 15/07/2025 10:41

Summerinthecity25 · 15/07/2025 10:36

This isn’t about the verdict but something I noticed in some of the cctv images. Marten was carrying the baby in her coat but the coat was completely done up. How could the baby breathe?

I know lots of their actions showed they could not care for a baby safely and that’s why the baby died but the coat thing struck me yesterday as something so basic and odd and unsafe. No one would carry a baby like that.

She killed her baby through neglect . It seems she wasn't really concerned about how Victoria could breathe.

OP posts:
NotrialNodeal · 15/07/2025 10:50

MidnightPatrol · 14/07/2025 15:24

“Gordon was jailed for 40 years, serving half of that in the US before being deported back to the UK.

When he was sentenced for both attacks, the rape victim pleaded with a judge to never let him free saying: ‘I ask you to make sure that this man does not have the opportunity to destroy any more lives.
‘Someone who is capable of doing this, a cruel calculated act at this age is not going to get better. He is only going to do more harm in society.’

He hid his appalling criminal history from Marten when they met in 2016, keeping it secret until after they had a spiritual marriage in Peru and had their first child together.

It wasn't until he assaulted two police officers in hospital after Marten gave birth under a false name that she learnt he was a violent rapist considered at 'high risk' of reoffending.

Gordon later attacked Marten when she was pregnant with their third child, throwing her out of their flat window and sending her plunging 18ft to the ground, hitting a car on the way.

As she lay screaming in agony with a shattered spleen and internal bleeding, putting her life and her unborn child at risk, Gordon didn't call an ambulance and attempted to delay paramedics alerted by concerned neighbours.

Marten would spend the next eight days in hospital recovering from surgery, but Gordon demanded she should be discharged despite doctors warning this would put her life at risk.

The domestic abuse was the catalyst for a family court judge to rule their four older children should be taken into care for their own protection from a ‘violent sex offender’ whose actions had ‘put her life and the life of their unborn child at serious risk’.

Two years before the death of Victoria, District Judge Madeleine Reardon warned: ‘It is much more likely than not that in the foreseeable future the children will be exposed to serious physical violence between their parents.”

This is so disturbing and sad in equal measures. Ultimately I feel sad for baby Victoria and also her siblings. I do have some sympathy for the mother but feel she should feel the full force of the law as she is accountable for the decisions she made. I was reading today about her upbringing and her parents are portrayed as neglectful. I think Marten has had a difficult life but as an adult her behaviour is inexcusable.

softlyfallsthesnow · 15/07/2025 10:54

LetsGoRoundAgainAgain · 15/07/2025 10:41

She killed her baby through neglect . It seems she wasn't really concerned about how Victoria could breathe.

Exactly this.
I guess her thought processes aren't like most people's. Keeping the baby alive was way down the list.
I don't envy the people who have to manage her in prison as she's likely to be a malevolent influence on other prisoners, apart from a nightmare to deal with.

When do they get sentenced?

LindtLindor · 15/07/2025 10:57

One of the most explosive moments in the couple's retrial happened when Marten was giving evidence. She suddenly blurted out to the jury that her husband had a "violent rape conviction".
We all knew about Gordon's previous conviction. But the jury didn't.
To ensure he received a fair trial, an order preventing the media from reporting Gordon's previous offences was put in place. It was never mentioned in front of the jury.

Wasn’t the information about the rape in the media when they were looking for the couple initially? Was it just when there was going to be a trial they stopped reporting on this?

Allthegoodhorses · 15/07/2025 10:57

Zonder · 14/07/2025 16:33

Presumably because she couldn't afford a lawyer?

This bit I am finding a bit odd. I happen to live about a mile from the estate the family live in. They have a lot of land and lots of houses and over the last year loads has been sold off to pay for the court case. Her aunt specifically said they were funding it. Obviously this is not the case.

Arraminta · 15/07/2025 11:07

Lalgarh · 15/07/2025 09:50

Re that comment from the judge that he'd never been spoken to in the way this pair had behaved so in court.

Comment from elsewhere but a barrister was commenting that quite a lot of ppl in court get off convictions and guilty verdicts simply BC they carry themselves well and esp speak with a posh accent and demeanor. Marten probably thought she could carry on as per her ancestors and get this inconvenience over and done with. That's privileges for you.

Agree. She was your typical swishy-haired posh bitch, grown bored with her life of utter bohemian privilege. So she decided to liven things up, by cos-playing at being a gypsy rebel, thumbing her partician nose at the establishment. But happy to dip into her multi million trust fund as needed, of course.

But now it's all gone wrong and she's furious that the serfs are daring to question her actions.

BabyCatFace · 15/07/2025 11:31

LindtLindor · 15/07/2025 10:57

One of the most explosive moments in the couple's retrial happened when Marten was giving evidence. She suddenly blurted out to the jury that her husband had a "violent rape conviction".
We all knew about Gordon's previous conviction. But the jury didn't.
To ensure he received a fair trial, an order preventing the media from reporting Gordon's previous offences was put in place. It was never mentioned in front of the jury.

Wasn’t the information about the rape in the media when they were looking for the couple initially? Was it just when there was going to be a trial they stopped reporting on this?

Yes it was. I think the idea that none of the jurors knew about the rape conviction was optimistic.

Lalgarh · 15/07/2025 11:36

Folie a Deux. They're still besotted with each other and apparently are married

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn0zkg4g4zyo

A couple who were twice in the dock over the death of their newborn baby, they appeared to be completely in love and still fiercely united. And yet they had utter contempt for the court process.

They caused chaos across their two trials, which both overran by months. At one point, the Old Bailey's most senior judge accused them of trying to "sabotage" and "manipulate" their retrial. It nearly collapsed a number of times.

Their behaviour - from refusing to turn up to court and claiming to be ill, to sacking countless barristers and Gordon's trousers even being misplaced one day - left His Honour Judge Mark Lucraft KC exasperated on many occasions.
At one point he said two teenagers, who had been in his court the previous week, were "rather better behaved" than Marten, adding: "And they pleaded guilty to murder."

A graphic of a court sketch showing Mark Gordon and Constance Marten sitting behind glass in a court dock with a dock officer between them. He is wearing a white shirt and blue tie and has short dark hair. She is wearing a white blouse with a yellow pa...

I've never seen a case like Constance Marten and Mark Gordon's - it was jaw-dropping

Now the case is over, the BBC can report some of the remarkable moments when jurors weren't in court.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn0zkg4g4zyo

Bunnycat101 · 15/07/2025 11:57

The whole thing is very odd and very sad. He is clearly an extremely dangerous individual who should never be allowed out. I can’t work her out at all. No doubt a victim of domestic violence but potentially also quite messed up to have gotten herself into that situation in the first place.

ZoeCM · 15/07/2025 12:00

From the description of Marten's behaviour, I can't believe she's thirty-eight. She sounds like a fifteen-year-old: blowing kisses to Gordon, loudly asking him to stop flirting with her, asking to nip out for a coffee... all during a trial over her own baby's death. With parents like that, poor Victoria never had a chance.

WendyFromTransvisionWamp · 15/07/2025 12:39

Lots of men in prisons have had a difficult early life but no-one’s feeling sorry for them. Marten had so many options to get out but chose to stay with the rapist. She has also shown no remorse whatsoever over the death of her baby nor the neglect of her other children. Why on earth would anyone feel sorry for her?? She is not a victim in this case.

softlyfallsthesnow · 15/07/2025 12:44

@Lalgarh Charles Spencer, himself a complete git to his wife, went public about the abuse he suffered in boarding school he had other compatriots shun him for breaking rank

I'd have stopped at the 'complete git' to be honest. I can't summon up an ounce of sympathy for such a narcissist.

softlyfallsthesnow · 15/07/2025 12:46

...but I get your point

prh47bridge · 15/07/2025 12:48

LetsGoRoundAgainAgain · 15/07/2025 07:45

Yes he will do the sentencing. I'm not sure if court behaviour is something that he can add on time for, I'm not sure.

The sentencing guidelines don't allow for that. However, they are both facing many years in prison.

MounjaroMounjaro · 15/07/2025 13:48

A life sentence is available for manslaughter and I can't see why they should get less than that.

prh47bridge · 15/07/2025 14:58

MounjaroMounjaro · 15/07/2025 13:48

A life sentence is available for manslaughter and I can't see why they should get less than that.

Judges have to comply with the sentencing guidelines unless there are exceptional reasons to step outside them. The maximum sentence allowed for gross negligence manslaughter is 18 years. I may be wrong, but I don't think there is enough in this case to justify the judge going beyond the maximum in the guidelines.