I’ll bite (no pun intended 😆).
I eat a small amount of meat that has a local provenance and is good quality because I can afford to.
If my circumstances were different though, and I was on a very low wage and had to feed four children; I wouldn’t hesitate to buy the best quality supermarket chicken I could afford every so often and I would be very grateful for it.
I’m sorry but I think a lot of people who avoid eating meat on principle because they don’t agree with killing animals are missing a fundamental point about nature; which is, that death is everywhere in the wild. I live in the countryside and I am surrounded by death every day. Death is part of nature just as much as life is. The same with farming, if you have live stock, then you have dead stock too.
Animals naturally eat one another. We eat animals. Insects eat the remains. It’s natural and it’s the way the natural world functions.
Now of course we have to lobby for as good welfare standards for farmed animals in the food chain as possible. But I don’t think there is anything wrong fundamentally with one animal (us) eating another animal (a leg of lamb) for example. And in terms of social justice, I am glad that children whose parents live on a minimum wage can eat chicken and sausages and that meat is not only for rich people.
The challenge is to improve welfare standards and meat quality and keep pressurising supermarkets to enforce high standards, something we have made more difficult for ourselves post-Brexit.