Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Why is everyone so angry at Labour?

473 replies

18thday · 02/07/2025 19:29

From what I understand they tried to cut (essential) benefits and put the money somewhere else. And what happened was labour MPs got angry, threat of resulting poverty in the population etc. So labour backtracked.

My questions are

  1. they backtracked so doesnt that mean they get it?

B) weren't they trying to find money to fill a hole that must be filled?

C) How else could have they raised the money? High taxed- bad people get very annoyed NHS cant handle more cuts.

I'm guessing they thought that forcing people off benefits would stimulate the economy by forcing people 'back into work'.

OP posts:
WeylandYutani · 03/07/2025 22:46

shrunkenhead · 03/07/2025 22:44

But so many people take the Mick with this set up, hence employers want people back at work. You can't blame them. Who wouldn't want a nice little wfh job that meant you can do the school run, walk the dog, peg out washing, unload the dishwasher etc etc?!

My boyfriend has a WFH job and that is all he could do as he disabled. Take WFH away and he wont be able to work.
He is not alone on that.

BurntBroccoli · 04/07/2025 00:48

shrunkenhead · 03/07/2025 22:44

But so many people take the Mick with this set up, hence employers want people back at work. You can't blame them. Who wouldn't want a nice little wfh job that meant you can do the school run, walk the dog, peg out washing, unload the dishwasher etc etc?!

The issues are poor management not working from home.

BurntBroccoli · 04/07/2025 00:50

alexalisten · 03/07/2025 21:27

Vouchers are really difficult because what people spend pip on is vastly different and it could end up where vouchers can only be used by certain taxi firms, therapists and mobility shops etc which wouldn't be helpful unless you lived in a city also I could imagine companies would suddenly significantly raise their prices if they were government vouchers. I just dont see how it would work on a practical level.

Yes. This is what has happened with childcare places. Providers have just put their rates up.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

BurntBroccoli · 04/07/2025 00:52

shrunkenhead · 03/07/2025 22:44

But so many people take the Mick with this set up, hence employers want people back at work. You can't blame them. Who wouldn't want a nice little wfh job that meant you can do the school run, walk the dog, peg out washing, unload the dishwasher etc etc?!

Oh and I meant to say that yes, I do washing etc. BUT on my lunch break as do many.

LongLiveTheLego · 04/07/2025 01:44

SteamLover · 02/07/2025 20:58

This is the annoying thing. PIP is apparently to offset the costs of being disabled. My dp has a disability that does not reach the threshold for claiming PIP but incurs significant extra costs - taxis, a £2k orthopaedic chair, special mattress. If you keep working the costs of being disabled are much higher because you actually need to get to places. But because he can walk more than 200m it’s all apparently fine and we can just absorb the costs.

Yes it is and it rarely comes close even with a successful claim pip claim. I think people have a hard time understanding how expensive non physical disabilities can be. You mentioned tax’s, my sister showed me her Uber account ( cheaper and more reliable than taxis where she lives) she spent over £5000 in 12 months on Ubers to go to work. Her disabilities are not physical. Without pip she couldn’t afford to work. She also pays for therapy and medication, and many other essential items and services. It’s not a race to the bottom, your dp’s taxis for essential journeys should have part of the cost paid for. Essential medical equipment should be paid for. The reason it isn’t, is not because people with non physical disabilities have money they don’t need.

Absolutely45 · 04/07/2025 07:16

Badbadbunny · 03/07/2025 14:19

Austerity was needed AT THE TIME.

Covid lockdowns and support were needed AT THE TIME

Trouble is both went on for far too long. It was as if the government at the time couldn't stop it.

Re Austerity, Labour also promised the same (if not worse) levels of austerity under Ed Milliband.

All developed/western countries had huge covid support grants/subsidies otherwise their economies would have collapsed.

But as I say, they went on for too long. Austerity should have been just one term of office and then the spending taps opened again. The first lockdown should have been enough - after all it was "only" to flatten the peaks - yet it morphed almost into zero covid and no one dying.

Yes thats my take on it too, the mid 2010s was a great time for the country to borrow to invest, instead we borrowed to make up for terrible growth and the cuts actually cost us money, both back then and in the future.

Then instead of focusing on they country, they gave us Brexit, something that tied up the resources of Govt for years, still does.

Not too mention the loss to the economy and soaring migration.

Covid support, was given for far too long and with no checks, money handed out like confetti, then fraud written off.

EaglesSwim · 04/07/2025 07:57

Absolutely45 · 04/07/2025 07:16

Yes thats my take on it too, the mid 2010s was a great time for the country to borrow to invest, instead we borrowed to make up for terrible growth and the cuts actually cost us money, both back then and in the future.

Then instead of focusing on they country, they gave us Brexit, something that tied up the resources of Govt for years, still does.

Not too mention the loss to the economy and soaring migration.

Covid support, was given for far too long and with no checks, money handed out like confetti, then fraud written off.

Yes, previous goverments have overspent so now the grownups are in tbe room we desperately need to get a grip.

...and they didn't. They've just done exactly what the previous government did and kept on spending.

And it's unlikely any future goverment will have a majority like this one, so when is it going to be fixed? Never. It's a disaster. Takers are increasing fast and people putting in are declining and the system is accelerating that.

The fix is unpopular so only a government with a massive majority can fix that and the backbenchers fucked us all over.

HRTQueen · 04/07/2025 08:15

Like the winter fuel allowance it was a badly thought out plan

many will absolutely support welfare changes but not as a quick fix to cut budgets

the stress this has caused so many vulnerable people has been so unfair this was highlighted again and again and they didn’t listen

leadership have to listen to their MP’s they have to listen to the public. they didn’t until knowing they would lose face

I think Starmer will learn from this he is well aware of the importance of keeping the party together

EaglesSwim · 04/07/2025 08:26

I think Starmer will learn from this he is well aware of the importance of keeping the party together

Yes. He's learned he can't make cuts. So the economy will keep going down the tubes, productivity will get worse and worse. Fewer people will be under more and more strain to support more and more people. If a government with a land slide can't fix it, nobody can. We're fucked.

And yes, that will keep his party together for a bit longer at the expense of all us.

For those in work it's well past time to leave this sinking ship.

MrsSkylerWhite · 04/07/2025 08:27

18thday · 02/07/2025 20:49

There is no war to have. The UK only spends 4% on its defense budget. The next government the people vote it because they're angry at labour will just drown the country in national debt. Currently the UKs debt is 100.5% of its GDP.

Labour is literally trying to to do the right thing, even tho it's pissing people off. They know it risks them staying in power, their personal careers. But they're trying to do the hard thing that no one wanted, or will want to do.

Edited

You’re right.

Doingnothingtoday · 04/07/2025 08:35

pointythings · 02/07/2025 20:12

  1. Unreasonable expectations of immediate recovery after 14 years of neglect
  2. Hostile media
  3. Utter incompetence in managing the messaging
  4. Not thinking policies through before putting them in a bill
  5. Utter cowardice over anything to do with the EU, which is disastrous for anyone wanting to rebuild the economy

The Welfare bill should never have gone to a vote in its current form. It was just more 'punish the poor for being poor' - and Labour promised to be different. I'm glad the bill was gutted.

Absolutely spot on.

I’d be tempted to expand the hostile media point to include their enthusiasm when it comes to whipping up hysteria the minute tax rises are mentioned. We seem to be incapable of having a mature conversation about this issue - everyone wants things to be better, everyone seems to accept ‘there is no money’, and yet a sensible conversation about who and how we tax is seemingly impossible.

awaynboilyurheid · 04/07/2025 08:39

I think they have been left with a huge huge mess from the disaster that was Boris et al and need to claw back money but agree the way they are doing it is a PR disaster.
Pensioners on pension credit would still get the winter warmer allowance but this wasn’t shouted about enough
I’m a “ pensioner “ but don’t think I should get extra money for heating just pay like everyone else and no I’m not wealthy I was on nurses wages all my life and I live in Scotland and it’s freezing!

Labour then shot themselves in the foot by saying they would be looking at PIP the tories would have called it “ helping people back to work “

Then people say they need to “ Fix “ the NHS are they joking ? Like ANY government could do that it’s limping along but it’s never going to be fixable if by that people mean no waiting times or operation lists
Then immigration again no country is solving this yet we expect Labour to suddenly fix this really ?
The anger comes from thinking Labour could wave a wand and fix stuff immediately I really think people have zero clue about the mess left behind.

MrsSkylerWhite · 04/07/2025 08:41

Your point 5. is so important, @Doingnothingtoday . With the precarious state of the world, this is a golden opportunity to rejoin the EU. At this point, the UK would be welcomed back with open arms.

I really don’t understand why the government isn’t throwing everything at that opportunity. It would have the support of the majority of the population.

Jellycatspyjamas · 04/07/2025 08:45

everyone wants things to be better, everyone seems to accept ‘there is no money’, and yet a sensible conversation about who and how we tax is seemingly impossible.

I agree, but part of that conversation needs to include over reliance on the state and it seems utterly impossible to discuss that without every group in receipt of benefits being in absolute uproar about how they can’t possibly be expected to work/work more or how unfair it is that they don’t get WFA, child benefit, help with childcare costs. Yes we need a pragmatic conversation about what goes into the pot, we also need one about what comes out and who it goes to.

EasternStandard · 04/07/2025 08:52

Doingnothingtoday · 04/07/2025 08:35

Absolutely spot on.

I’d be tempted to expand the hostile media point to include their enthusiasm when it comes to whipping up hysteria the minute tax rises are mentioned. We seem to be incapable of having a mature conversation about this issue - everyone wants things to be better, everyone seems to accept ‘there is no money’, and yet a sensible conversation about who and how we tax is seemingly impossible.

The media have done this for years. Some were just more amenable when it was whipping up re the last gov.

Profit was the motivator then too.

MyObservations · 04/07/2025 08:55

18thday · 02/07/2025 19:29

From what I understand they tried to cut (essential) benefits and put the money somewhere else. And what happened was labour MPs got angry, threat of resulting poverty in the population etc. So labour backtracked.

My questions are

  1. they backtracked so doesnt that mean they get it?

B) weren't they trying to find money to fill a hole that must be filled?

C) How else could have they raised the money? High taxed- bad people get very annoyed NHS cant handle more cuts.

I'm guessing they thought that forcing people off benefits would stimulate the economy by forcing people 'back into work'.

It seems to me that generally speaking, people forget that it took the last Govt 14 years to trash the economy and they expect the current Govt to rectify every immediately without raising taxes. It's quite bizarre really. BTW, I didn't vote for this Govt but it has only been a year - give them a chance for goodness sake or go into politics yourselves and see if you can do better!

alexalisten · 04/07/2025 09:18

awaynboilyurheid · 04/07/2025 08:39

I think they have been left with a huge huge mess from the disaster that was Boris et al and need to claw back money but agree the way they are doing it is a PR disaster.
Pensioners on pension credit would still get the winter warmer allowance but this wasn’t shouted about enough
I’m a “ pensioner “ but don’t think I should get extra money for heating just pay like everyone else and no I’m not wealthy I was on nurses wages all my life and I live in Scotland and it’s freezing!

Labour then shot themselves in the foot by saying they would be looking at PIP the tories would have called it “ helping people back to work “

Then people say they need to “ Fix “ the NHS are they joking ? Like ANY government could do that it’s limping along but it’s never going to be fixable if by that people mean no waiting times or operation lists
Then immigration again no country is solving this yet we expect Labour to suddenly fix this really ?
The anger comes from thinking Labour could wave a wand and fix stuff immediately I really think people have zero clue about the mess left behind.

They dont need to fix the nhs need to fix social care which will then fix the nhs

PersephonePomegranate · 04/07/2025 09:33

Goody2ShoesAndTheFilthyBeast · 02/07/2025 19:58

No. Lots of people just seem to feel disabled people shouldn't get pip.

They don't seem to have suggestions for how disabled people will survive after that. I guess they dont care about that as long as the government saves the money.

The problem with PIP, is that a lot of people don't depend upon it to survive. It's not means tested at all. I know two separate people with genuine phyical disabilities, who are both able to WFH full time - one is a higher earner. Both spouses have got rid of their cars and use their partners, which they've got through the Mototbolity scheme as thei means of transport to work.

We're talking two fill time workers with a household income of around 100k - how is that right?

I also know other people who do depend on PIP as they are full time carers and carer's allowance is so pitiful, they could do without it. It's an absolute shit show.

InterestedBeing · 04/07/2025 19:25

PersephonePomegranate · 04/07/2025 09:33

The problem with PIP, is that a lot of people don't depend upon it to survive. It's not means tested at all. I know two separate people with genuine phyical disabilities, who are both able to WFH full time - one is a higher earner. Both spouses have got rid of their cars and use their partners, which they've got through the Mototbolity scheme as thei means of transport to work.

We're talking two fill time workers with a household income of around 100k - how is that right?

I also know other people who do depend on PIP as they are full time carers and carer's allowance is so pitiful, they could do without it. It's an absolute shit show.

Well yes and one of my disabled colleagues has a freedom pass. He has a physical disability but a very able and active person.

He's a solicitor. He can absolutely afford his fares to work and wfh a lot anyway.

WeylandYutani · 04/07/2025 19:27

PersephonePomegranate · 04/07/2025 09:33

The problem with PIP, is that a lot of people don't depend upon it to survive. It's not means tested at all. I know two separate people with genuine phyical disabilities, who are both able to WFH full time - one is a higher earner. Both spouses have got rid of their cars and use their partners, which they've got through the Mototbolity scheme as thei means of transport to work.

We're talking two fill time workers with a household income of around 100k - how is that right?

I also know other people who do depend on PIP as they are full time carers and carer's allowance is so pitiful, they could do without it. It's an absolute shit show.

PIP is for the extra costs that disability often brings. It is not to help people survive. It is to help them live independently. it is to level the field.

PersephonePomegranate · 04/07/2025 19:56

WeylandYutani · 04/07/2025 19:27

PIP is for the extra costs that disability often brings. It is not to help people survive. It is to help them live independently. it is to level the field.

Edited

I'm addressing people who have said that people won't be able to survive without PIP.

I'm pretty sure it's not for their spouses to use to get to work, instead of their own car!

WeylandYutani · 04/07/2025 20:01

PersephonePomegranate · 04/07/2025 19:56

I'm addressing people who have said that people won't be able to survive without PIP.

I'm pretty sure it's not for their spouses to use to get to work, instead of their own car!

Yes, as long as they are named on the insurance then they can use it for work.

PersephonePomegranate · 04/07/2025 20:12

WeylandYutani · 04/07/2025 20:01

Yes, as long as they are named on the insurance then they can use it for work.

This is exactly the problem with this benefit! How is it right?!

WeylandYutani · 04/07/2025 20:15

PersephonePomegranate · 04/07/2025 20:12

This is exactly the problem with this benefit! How is it right?!

They can use it for work though as bringing in money to the household benefits the disabled person. There are rules around it though.
How is that wrong?

PersephonePomegranate · 04/07/2025 20:20

WeylandYutani · 04/07/2025 20:15

They can use it for work though as bringing in money to the household benefits the disabled person. There are rules around it though.
How is that wrong?

Because many of these people are perfectly capable of affording a car, they just don't have one because they're getting a freebie!

I give up. It's this grabby, entitled attitude that's fucked this country.