Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Taxes to rise to fund PIP 2

350 replies

Viviennemary · 28/06/2025 21:06

I saw the other thread was full. Still I look forward to the vote which is on Tuesday. Sky news called him two Tier Keir. Most unfair thing ever if this passes.

OP posts:
onehorserace · 29/06/2025 15:09

PhilippaGeorgiou · 29/06/2025 14:53

I’ll pay more tax when I can have a say in where it goes.

You'll pay more taxes when you are told to pay more taxes. That is how it works.

Unless you work a by pass which many are and will do.

MyNameIsX · 29/06/2025 15:12

PhilippaGeorgiou · 29/06/2025 14:53

I’ll pay more tax when I can have a say in where it goes.

You'll pay more taxes when you are told to pay more taxes. That is how it works.

Possibly the dumbest post today.

EasternStandard · 29/06/2025 15:25

taxguru · 29/06/2025 14:58

Nope! There are ever increasing numbers of people who can "tweak" their lives to avoid taxes, i.e. retired early, go part time, emigrate, etc. And they are doing!

I've never had so much IHT planning work in 40 years of accountancy than in the last few months since Rachel's IHT changes on pension scheme funds. Client after client who'd previously been liable for modest amounts of IHT seeing the potential bills rise enormously and making changes to wills, trusts, etc to avoid it completely. So instead of Rachel getting a few tens of thousands, she gets nothing, as she was so greedy she wanted a hundred or two hundred thousand, but it's spectacularly backfired.

Always the same when someone hits their personal tax "tipping point" and always the same that HMRC end up with less than they'd have got without rule changes.

Agree. Labour have stuffed up on this. They'll have to work out another way other than more tax rises.

InWithPeaceOutWithStress · 29/06/2025 15:29

But Kier is cutting PIP. Why would we need a tax rise if benefits are being cut? This post doesn’t make any sense.

alexalisten · 29/06/2025 15:32

StarCourt · 29/06/2025 14:13

i receive PIP and work, I’d be absolutely happy to pay more tax to fund it

Same

alexalisten · 29/06/2025 15:34

UncharteredWaters · 29/06/2025 14:46

I’ll pay more tax when I can have a say in where it goes.

Not paying for the feckless, waste of time losers who hang around town centres drinking each day, or youths with ‘my mental health’ nonsense.
that no one can deny/prove.

happy to help foot increasing cancer care, lifelong neurological illnesses etc.
Too many people seeing someone else’s benefits and wanting the same!!!

I have a lifelong neurological illness its one of the reasons I get pip

alexalisten · 29/06/2025 15:35

InWithPeaceOutWithStress · 29/06/2025 15:29

But Kier is cutting PIP. Why would we need a tax rise if benefits are being cut? This post doesn’t make any sense.

Exactly but people just want an excuse to slag off disabled people so they make things up

EasternStandard · 29/06/2025 15:37

alexalisten · 29/06/2025 15:35

Exactly but people just want an excuse to slag off disabled people so they make things up

Did you see the recent u turn?

Miley23 · 29/06/2025 15:41

InWithPeaceOutWithStress · 29/06/2025 15:29

But Kier is cutting PIP. Why would we need a tax rise if benefits are being cut? This post doesn’t make any sense.

Because he's not cutting PIP as much as he previously wanted so taxes may have to increase to cover the shortfall of what they thought they would save and what they actually will now save ! the future of the welfare state is at risk anyway because even with these current proposed cuts, the benefits bill is expected to rise massively over the next five years. These cuts are just a temporary sticking plaster.

alexalisten · 29/06/2025 15:41

EasternStandard · 29/06/2025 15:37

Did you see the recent u turn?

Yes but we haven't actually been told anything yet. If what the press is saying is true it means any future claimants will be screwed over so that is how they are making their savings so they dont need people to pay extra tax or if they do it isnt for that reason

SarfLondonLad · 29/06/2025 15:46

MyNameIsX · 29/06/2025 10:58

The sooner, and further left Labour goes, the better.

Let’s rip off the band aid - only then will the electorate properly turn, and be ready to vote in a non-socialist administration, who have core competence, and are not ideologically-driven, based on envy and spite.

Labour are 1000% more competent than any Tory Govt of the last 14 years and if you are thinking of a Reform Govt, the sole purpose of Reform is to make Liz Truss look like she knew what she was doing.

Miley23 · 29/06/2025 15:46

alexalisten · 29/06/2025 15:41

Yes but we haven't actually been told anything yet. If what the press is saying is true it means any future claimants will be screwed over so that is how they are making their savings so they dont need people to pay extra tax or if they do it isnt for that reason

I doubt they will save as much as they say anyway. If new applicants are denied PIP, they will still need care and that will have to be provided by the local authority so will end up costing more. People will end up not being able to pay rent if they can't stay in work as basic benefits often don't cover full rent, and the government and local authorities will have more homelessness, kids in poverty etc to deal with unless these sick/ disabled people have family to step in and help. I think they really haven't thought the implications through properly of making PIP harder to get.

Julen7 · 29/06/2025 15:50

MarvellousMonsters · 29/06/2025 11:10

I can’t find anything that actually says taxes are rising to fund PIP, this is a scaremonger tactic to increase resentment towards disabled benefits.

There is no other way

alexalisten · 29/06/2025 15:51

Miley23 · 29/06/2025 15:46

I doubt they will save as much as they say anyway. If new applicants are denied PIP, they will still need care and that will have to be provided by the local authority so will end up costing more. People will end up not being able to pay rent if they can't stay in work as basic benefits often don't cover full rent, and the government and local authorities will have more homelessness, kids in poverty etc to deal with unless these sick/ disabled people have family to step in and help. I think they really haven't thought the implications through properly of making PIP harder to get.

Edited

100% this was always going to be the case. People dont suddenly become not disabled because you take away their disability benefits. If I lost pip and lcwra I would lose my home as I wouldn't be able to pay the mortgage plus all the extra costs of being disabled so I would need social housing. I would no longer be able to travel to hospital appointments so the government would need to source me transport (this costs about £600 a month) just to get to appointments. I would no longer be able to pay for private therapy so id need this through the nhs. I would no longer be able to afford my carer so they would need to pay for that. It would cost significantly more then just giving me pip and lcwra to pay for myself

Julen7 · 29/06/2025 15:53

alexalisten · 29/06/2025 15:41

Yes but we haven't actually been told anything yet. If what the press is saying is true it means any future claimants will be screwed over so that is how they are making their savings so they dont need people to pay extra tax or if they do it isnt for that reason

The savings are far less now than they had planned, as well as the U turn on WFA to fund

alexalisten · 29/06/2025 15:54

Julen7 · 29/06/2025 15:53

The savings are far less now than they had planned, as well as the U turn on WFA to fund

Sorry im not sure what wfa is?

EasternStandard · 29/06/2025 15:54

alexalisten · 29/06/2025 15:41

Yes but we haven't actually been told anything yet. If what the press is saying is true it means any future claimants will be screwed over so that is how they are making their savings so they dont need people to pay extra tax or if they do it isnt for that reason

Because originally savings were meant to be due to stopping for all and that’s not happening.

Julen7 · 29/06/2025 15:54

alexalisten · 29/06/2025 15:54

Sorry im not sure what wfa is?

The winter fuel allowance.

alexalisten · 29/06/2025 15:55

Julen7 · 29/06/2025 15:54

The winter fuel allowance.

Thanks 😁

alexalisten · 29/06/2025 15:57

alexalisten · 29/06/2025 15:55

Thanks 😁

Maybe they will just go for some else next they tried the elderly then the disabled maybe it will be parents next cuts in child benefit or the child element of universal credit or free school meals or charging for schooling. Nothing would surprise me at this point.

Edit replied to wrong post @julen7

Julen7 · 29/06/2025 15:59

alexalisten · 29/06/2025 15:57

Maybe they will just go for some else next they tried the elderly then the disabled maybe it will be parents next cuts in child benefit or the child element of universal credit or free school meals or charging for schooling. Nothing would surprise me at this point.

Edit replied to wrong post @julen7

Edited

I don’t think Starmer will…it would be too unpopular. He would be U turning again and he has done too much of that already.

ImperialBlue · 29/06/2025 16:00

Income Tax needs to go up.

Perhaps pensioners should be paying more? Seeing as National Insurance is just a tax, I don't see why pensioners should not have to pay it. Obviously, as with all income taxes, it would be levied according to means, so pensioners on very low incomes wouldn't reach the threshold and wouldn't pay it.

On a similar subject, I do feel that £35k as the income threshold for winter fuel benefits is a bit too high: a fairer threshold would be £25k, I think.

alexalisten · 29/06/2025 16:01

Julen7 · 29/06/2025 15:59

I don’t think Starmer will…it would be too unpopular. He would be U turning again and he has done too much of that already.

Like I said who knows this is the worst labour leader we've ever had. Who ever thought a Labour government would target the most vulnerable in society its the opposite of what they stand for but here we are.

alexalisten · 29/06/2025 16:03

Maybe they bbc should start using adverts and what we pay in tv license we could pay in extra tax

MyNameIsX · 29/06/2025 16:11

SarfLondonLad · 29/06/2025 15:46

Labour are 1000% more competent than any Tory Govt of the last 14 years and if you are thinking of a Reform Govt, the sole purpose of Reform is to make Liz Truss look like she knew what she was doing.

14 years of Tory rule for a reason.

This Labour lot will ensure a minimum of another 14 year cycle, you’ll see.

No commercial acumen amongst any of the cabinet - just vicious, spiteful, incompetents.

In the GE, Labour’s vote share was 33.7%, the lowest of any majority party on record, making this the least proportional GE in British history.

Just 23% of Britons now express a favourable view of the prime minister Keir Starmer, a five-point drop from this time last month and equalling his July 2021 nadir as opposition leader. However, with the proportion of Britons with an unfavourable opinion of the Labour leader rising from 62% in mid-April to 69% today, Starmer’s net favourability rating has sunk to -46, his lowest ever recorded by YouGov.

READ THE ROOM, FELLA.

Swipe left for the next trending thread