Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Taxes to rise to fund PIP 2

350 replies

Viviennemary · 28/06/2025 21:06

I saw the other thread was full. Still I look forward to the vote which is on Tuesday. Sky news called him two Tier Keir. Most unfair thing ever if this passes.

OP posts:
plantsnpants · 29/06/2025 19:14

There are obviously people who need support and can’t work but so so many people can and don’t.

the country can not afford to fund a bottomless benefit pot

XenoBitch · 29/06/2025 19:15

LadyKenya · 29/06/2025 19:09

It is posts like the pp which shows the level of ignorance some people have about people with disabilities, and what disabled people are up against, and have to deal with. People with no understanding of the challenges that disabled people face, but seem to be very vocal about questioning the need for PIP, and what they do with the money they get. I know this thread is not about that in particular, but I have already seen the suggestion that some one receiving PIP, should not have gone on holiday. Honestly are disabled people expected to have no quality of life at all?

I remember PP saying about the autistic student using a PIP back payment to go on holiday before.
PIP can take ages to get, especially if you have to go to tribunal, so some people can end up with back payments of a couple of £grand.
You can't retrospectively pay for any care you needs you had. Before the student was awarded, any extra costs would have been paid for by them or their care needs just not met.
And when they get a lump sump from backpay... they can spend it on what they want. I hope the student had a great time on holiday.

justkeepswimingswiming · 29/06/2025 19:16

Well the answer is that all employers (not just the few) need to be more disability friendly, but the infrastructure isn’t there yet. The goverment have openly admitted this.
Also if people got the surgeries etc they needed instead of 3-4 years waiting lists, a lot of these people would not be claiming PIP.

XenoBitch · 29/06/2025 19:16

plantsnpants · 29/06/2025 19:14

There are obviously people who need support and can’t work but so so many people can and don’t.

the country can not afford to fund a bottomless benefit pot

People who can work, but don't, are on job seekers (or the UC version).
The changes Labour wanted to bring in was to actually pay that group more.

Julen7 · 29/06/2025 19:16

BeverleyCleverley · 29/06/2025 19:11

I think there has to be a debate about that though. Because I work (at the expense of my quality of life outside or work). How much in taxes is it fair to ask one disabled person to pay to fund another disabled person's quality of life?!

It's important to move away from the idea that working people and those who don't claim PIP don't have health battles too.

Well said.

LadyKenya · 29/06/2025 19:18

BeverleyCleverley · 29/06/2025 19:11

I think there has to be a debate about that though. Because I work (at the expense of my quality of life outside or work). How much in taxes is it fair to ask one disabled person to pay to fund another disabled person's quality of life?!

It's important to move away from the idea that working people and those who don't claim PIP don't have health battles too.

Where has anybody disputed that a large number of the working population don't have health issues? Of course that includes disabled people, and non disabled people.

PandoraSocks · 29/06/2025 19:18

Ah, are we heading into deserving disabled vs the undeserving disabled territory? Oh goody.

LadyKenya · 29/06/2025 19:19

XenoBitch · 29/06/2025 19:16

People who can work, but don't, are on job seekers (or the UC version).
The changes Labour wanted to bring in was to actually pay that group more.

Which made sense!😕

iwentjasonwaterfalls · 29/06/2025 19:20

Well, it only took 6 pages to get into the "but I'm a GOOD disabled person who still works, not like all these horrible lazy ones stealing your taxes" bollocks.

justkeepswimingswiming · 29/06/2025 19:23

iwentjasonwaterfalls · 29/06/2025 19:20

Well, it only took 6 pages to get into the "but I'm a GOOD disabled person who still works, not like all these horrible lazy ones stealing your taxes" bollocks.

Such a classic.

Upupandaway10 · 29/06/2025 19:24

Jamesblonde2 · 29/06/2025 14:13

No no no. I pay enough tax and I’m sick of paying for benefits for so many people. Out of my hand into someone else’s. If YOU want to pay more tax for state benefits, because you’re feeling generous, make a payment direct to HMRC. Easy enough to access on the internet. And you can feel good about yourself.

Love this reply!!

EasternStandard · 29/06/2025 19:25

MyNameIsX · 29/06/2025 18:22

Labour are slowly but surely breaking the social contract which has be a fundamental element of UK society - taxpayers and soon-to-be taxpayers will see little in return and will just be covering the costs of others, even if they are deserving.

No wonder tax payers are leaving the country in droves as they see less and less in return - except for the braying mob spurred on by the BBC.

Soon, the state pension, NHS access etc will be removed from many of us.

It’s coming.

Edited

The social contract mentioned here is the thing to watch. Labour can't push everyone too far and expect all the funding to hold up.

Helpmefindmysoul · 29/06/2025 19:27

@Ohthatsabitshit no why should the higher bracket households shoulder the burden for the great good of society? What do we get out of it?
We earn enough to support our family and we are not living some well off comfortable life that everyone on mumsnet seems to perceive.
We are not reckless and tired of hearing this rhetoric. We don’t qualify for child benefit but that’s okay because we planned the children we wanted and should be able to support them right? The children didn’t choose us as the parents so why do they not get their child benefit? The same children that will be expected to become tax payers in the next 20 years?
I have two autoimmune conditions but no we should be paying more tax for others.
Tax now, then tax the pensions then tax assets. This hatred for people who earn a little more is tiresome.

How about MPs live in their constituency and travel to Westminster as required without claiming second home expenses and solely living off their already tax payer funded salary. Just like the rest of the workforce in this country that has to decide if they can do the commute to work on the compensation they receive.

If expenses were taken away I’m sure a lot of money would be available to the public purse.

I also agree that mental health conditions such as depression and anxiety should not be under long term PIP. I say this as someone who has PTSD, and likely bouts of depression. I have found that working has assisted my mental health and supporting individuals through alternative channels might be more effective.

Further if we continue on this greater tax trajectory more tax payers will emigrate and then we will have even a high tax burden with more going out than can be covered. Yet these people will no doubt be back when they’re older and the countries they emigrate too are not willing to cover their long term chronic conditions.

Perhaps we should make it so tourists who come to London have to pay a greater tourist levy to enter attractions to generate tax or a higher NHS levy for those who work in the UK without citizenship. Students taking out health insurance when coming to study in the UK, families also having to pay a levy towards the schools, until they obtain their ILR.

These practises don’t seem to be a problem in any other county but god forbid it’s suggested in the UK there is an uproar.

But hard no on the increased taxes.

alexalisten · 29/06/2025 19:28

BeverleyCleverley · 29/06/2025 19:11

I think there has to be a debate about that though. Because I work (at the expense of my quality of life outside or work). How much in taxes is it fair to ask one disabled person to pay to fund another disabled person's quality of life?!

It's important to move away from the idea that working people and those who don't claim PIP don't have health battles too.

Most people who claims pip knows this. I was born disabled but worked full time up until about 3 years ago when my conditions had deteriorated to the point I couldn't anymore I just kept ending up hospitalised. I now work part time and claim pip

Upupandaway10 · 29/06/2025 19:29

taxguru · 29/06/2025 14:58

Nope! There are ever increasing numbers of people who can "tweak" their lives to avoid taxes, i.e. retired early, go part time, emigrate, etc. And they are doing!

I've never had so much IHT planning work in 40 years of accountancy than in the last few months since Rachel's IHT changes on pension scheme funds. Client after client who'd previously been liable for modest amounts of IHT seeing the potential bills rise enormously and making changes to wills, trusts, etc to avoid it completely. So instead of Rachel getting a few tens of thousands, she gets nothing, as she was so greedy she wanted a hundred or two hundred thousand, but it's spectacularly backfired.

Always the same when someone hits their personal tax "tipping point" and always the same that HMRC end up with less than they'd have got without rule changes.

That’s interesting never heard anything about that. Are this Labour gov just a useless bunch of idiots?

Fsads · 29/06/2025 19:33

LadyKenya · 29/06/2025 19:09

It is posts like the pp which shows the level of ignorance some people have about people with disabilities, and what disabled people are up against, and have to deal with. People with no understanding of the challenges that disabled people face, but seem to be very vocal about questioning the need for PIP, and what they do with the money they get. I know this thread is not about that in particular, but I have already seen the suggestion that some one receiving PIP, should not have gone on holiday. Honestly are disabled people expected to have no quality of life at all?

I'm open to have my mind changed but if someone is completely unable to work due to health issues then the sum of their welfare money they get should be enough to sustain them. Food, water, heating, utility bills etc.

No one is entitled to luxuries. There are working people who can't afford passports and can't afford to go abroad.

Imo someone who cannot work due to their health deserves enough to have some basic standard of life provided but the taxpayer cannot needlessly subsidise.

Everlore · 29/06/2025 19:34

justkeepswimingswiming · 29/06/2025 19:16

Well the answer is that all employers (not just the few) need to be more disability friendly, but the infrastructure isn’t there yet. The goverment have openly admitted this.
Also if people got the surgeries etc they needed instead of 3-4 years waiting lists, a lot of these people would not be claiming PIP.

Exactly. I work. I'm lucky enough to have a good employer who does their best to meet my access needs. Many workplaces would not be able to accommodate me because of the level of specialised equipment and medical support I require and because, with the best will in the world, there are a limited range of job types that are suitable for a blind woman with restricted mobility to engage in. It takes a great deal of time, money, resources and, above all, goodwill to make a workplace truly accessible for those with severe physical disabilities and most employers will sadly lack some or all of these things. I do wonder where all these jobs are going to come from for all the disabled people who are apparently being encouraged to rejoin the workforce, but if I'm wrong and this is going to herald the dawn of a new era of true workplace inclusivity and a welcoming of disabled empployees then I'll be delighted to eat my words.

taxguru · 29/06/2025 19:35

MarvellousMonsters · 29/06/2025 19:08

And that, like all large scale tax avoidance, should be illegal. Those loopholes need to be closed.

Tax evasion is already illegal, i.e. not declaring income, over-declaring expenses, etc - basically lying on tax returns.

Tax planning is perfectly legal, i.e. complying with all relevant laws.

taxguru · 29/06/2025 19:37

Upupandaway10 · 29/06/2025 19:29

That’s interesting never heard anything about that. Are this Labour gov just a useless bunch of idiots?

Basically all governments bring in reliefs and exemptions for their cronies and paymasters but cry foul when "normal" people use the same reliefs and exemptions.

Buzyizzy217 · 29/06/2025 19:38

Viviennemary · 29/06/2025 07:32

No I wouldn't mind paying more tax. I'd like to see the personal allowance raised to say £20k or even £15k. And a percentage added on to each tax bracket. Also better off pensioners to pay NI.

Eh? Er, how would you fund our public services with no income? And no, pensioners have paid forty years, no more.
Now a tax on the wealthy would be very welcome and solve a lot of problems.
Regarding PIP, I am beyond relieved that current recipients are going to continue and I would hazard a guess that future applicants will not face the grilling, interrogation, horrendous ordeal that we did and the limits will be reduced from 4 to 3, which is fairly reasonable.
Starmer and co have restarted and generally got going literally 100’s of different stuff that is making all our lives a little bit easier. Far too many to list here. His Achilles heel is immigration and no one seems to have the answer. If you think anyone else could do better with the pile of rubbish Labour were handed on 5th July, I’d like to know how. We were told life would be difficult short term. I’m sure by 2027, if we’re not all fried or flooded out of our homes, things will be better.

TigerRag · 29/06/2025 19:39

Buzyizzy217 · 29/06/2025 19:38

Eh? Er, how would you fund our public services with no income? And no, pensioners have paid forty years, no more.
Now a tax on the wealthy would be very welcome and solve a lot of problems.
Regarding PIP, I am beyond relieved that current recipients are going to continue and I would hazard a guess that future applicants will not face the grilling, interrogation, horrendous ordeal that we did and the limits will be reduced from 4 to 3, which is fairly reasonable.
Starmer and co have restarted and generally got going literally 100’s of different stuff that is making all our lives a little bit easier. Far too many to list here. His Achilles heel is immigration and no one seems to have the answer. If you think anyone else could do better with the pile of rubbish Labour were handed on 5th July, I’d like to know how. We were told life would be difficult short term. I’m sure by 2027, if we’re not all fried or flooded out of our homes, things will be better.

There's only one criteria with 3 points so moving the goalposts from 4 to 3 won't make any difference to many people

Buzyizzy217 · 29/06/2025 19:40

Oh really? I know no one of working age who chooses to stay at home and do nothing. I do know several like myself who quite rightly claim PIP and work.

justkeepswimingswiming · 29/06/2025 19:41

@TigerRag they are currently working on changing the questions & points system, but this will take time.

XenoBitch · 29/06/2025 19:44

Fsads · 29/06/2025 19:33

I'm open to have my mind changed but if someone is completely unable to work due to health issues then the sum of their welfare money they get should be enough to sustain them. Food, water, heating, utility bills etc.

No one is entitled to luxuries. There are working people who can't afford passports and can't afford to go abroad.

Imo someone who cannot work due to their health deserves enough to have some basic standard of life provided but the taxpayer cannot needlessly subsidise.

Some people on benefits can budget... cut back on some things, and be able to spend on some luxuries. We need some nice things in life, otherwise what is the point?

Buzyizzy217 · 29/06/2025 19:45

TigerRag · 29/06/2025 19:39

There's only one criteria with 3 points so moving the goalposts from 4 to 3 won't make any difference to many people

I would imagine that the criteria is also going to be tweaked, which is long overdue. I am sure that a lot more thought is going to be given to this. Kendall needs to go tho, and Rayner for her hashtag #Dyingtowork. Things will change, I’m sure of it.

Swipe left for the next trending thread