In a way, good.
Either guilty is guilty regardless of wealth.
Or guilty is as guilty as you can afford.
This is one clear chance for the UK to show the world - and more importantly itself - that it's the former, not the latter.
If it turns out that shed loads of money can be clearly seen to buy a court then we have all been fed a load of bollocks about the law we are supposed to obey.
I realise that may sound odd, but asymmetric warfare does work two ways. Call it judo.