It was the other poster who used the term "low skilled jobs" without inverted commas. My reply placed inverted commas around the phrase. Many jobs classed by people as 'low skilled' actually require quite a bit of skill.
Making jobs financially and work:life balance attractive enough to get sufficient people to choose them over benefits is going to take a lot of effort and be expensive. Companies like making profit, so would likely increase prices for consumers rather than cut into their own profits. Government intervention to prevent that would be hugely unpopular with businesses so wouldn't get off the ground.
While it would be positive to get people out of economic inactivity, it's a long-term, challenging process. In the meantime, we still need people willing and able to do these jobs.