Yes, it would be more instructive to hear experiences with students who were at school in the mid-2010s, when more than half of children had started watching violent porn by the age of 13.
This is from the Children's Commissioner's report, January 2023:
Young people are frequently exposed to violent pornography, depicting coercive, degrading or pain-inducing sex acts; 79% had encountered violent pornography before the age of 18. Young people expressed concern about the implications of violent pornography on their understanding of the difference between sexual pleasure and harm. Indeed, this report finds that frequent users of pornography are more likely to engage in physically aggressive sex acts.
‘‘It reinforces negative ideas towards young people and children that women have a place below men, they are objects of desire, and can be hurt and sexually abused as long as it results in male gratification'
• 47% of respondents stated that girls expect sex to involve physical aggression. • A further 42% of respondents stated that girls enjoy physically aggressive sex acts.
Almost half, 47%, of respondents aged 18-21 had experienced a sexually violent act.
As the findings of this research demonstrate, consumption of degrading, aggressive and coercive pornography closely associates with real-life behaviours. Those who are first exposed to pornography at a young age appear to be more vulnerable to its impacts, as do frequent users of pornography. This research also finds that the real-world consequences of violent pornography are felt acutely by girls and young women.
... While not making assumptions about these boys or, indeed, all male students, it would be idiotic to ignore the changed cultural environment in which they've grown up. More than half of girls at UK universities now experience sexual violence. The risks are the same as they always were, only now they're far more intensively present.
MNers who work in universities have repeatedly affirmed this. I wouldn't be surprised if the person allocating the accommodation had mistakenly assumed OP's daughter is a boy.