I’ve subsequently come to realisation that letting baby sleep on you is how humans are naturally designed to raise babies. Think about it when we were in caves if babies weren’t held they’d have perished. This desire to be held is hard wired in them for survival and many very sensitive to not being held. throughout history till really recently people slept holding their babies. So I now sleep with LO on my chest, I’m propped up on cushions and have my arms around her . I feel very attuned to her and I’m not at all worried that she’ll move off me without me noticing, not least they can’t really move at this age. When she stirs I wake. I know loads of people will say this is unsafe and cite SIDS advice - I think the current advice is a bit useless for me.
I did exactly the same. DH was away 5.5 days a week so I had to maximise my sleep.
Fourth trimester: human babies are born 3 months premature because of the need for our pelvis’ to be so narrow for us to walk upright. For first 3 months they want what they had in the womb, which isn’t being laid on their backs away from us.
In this enlightened age, I have no idea how new parents think their brand new baby will just sleep when they’re put down in a strange environment and are surprised when they won’t.
The hospital environment is hideous. I had a 2 night stay after a 3 day labour. The heat, the noise, the lights, the constant interruptions (no, you can’t check my episiotomy stitches in the middle of visiting time, actually). Hourly checks overnight, changing wards in the middle of the night and then they couldn’t remember to bring me food without meat in it (it was 2010 - vegetarianism was hardly “out there”).
I discharged myself in the end and we worked it all out at home.