Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Thread 42 Sunak : Ping Pong with the Enemies of the People

1000 replies

DuncinToffee · 22/04/2024 08:58

Previous thread
https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/_chat/5049813-thread-41-how-many-more-mps-will-sunak-lose?page=40&reply=134717150

OP posts:
Thread gallery
83
user8800 · 30/04/2024 07:47

MrsMurphyIWish · 30/04/2024 06:30

As a lurker, I too had to post - especially in response to this.

I was a FSM child in the 80s too. We had to go in for food last as the paying children deserved the “best” food. Sometimes, we just didn’t eat as there wasn’t any food left and as I wasn’t fed at home I could days without eating.

I teach and although it’s all electronic payments through ParentPay, there are stickers on the food that the FSM are allowed to have. My school says it’s to stop kids purchasing crap like chips everyday (stickered food is a baguette, fruit and non flavoured water). I can understand that to some extent but also it still screams “you’re poor”.

That is horrific.
I'd be questioning the safeguarding team and governors on that policy!

user8800 · 30/04/2024 07:48

Oh, yes. All the "best" food saved for the "paying" children.

What a fucking world

user8800 · 30/04/2024 07:50

news.sky.com/story/brexit-border-checks-to-add-billions-to-consumer-bills-13125846

They didn't put this on the side of a fucking bus 😡

cakeorwine · 30/04/2024 07:57

Who'd have thought that more checks because we left the EU would mean more costs on imported food?

JessS1990 · 30/04/2024 07:58

cakeorwine · 30/04/2024 07:57

Who'd have thought that more checks because we left the EU would mean more costs on imported food?

Quite impossible to have known that.

Many of the leading Brexit campaigners were clear that the UK would stay in the single market, thus negating the need for such checks, but unfortunately the government got taken over by a different group of the people who didn't realise that the UK hed all the cads.

bombastix · 30/04/2024 08:02

I know Brexit is bad; but honestly did people think that making our relationship harder and trade more difficult with the EU was going to be cheaper?

It's the only trade deal in history that put up barriers instead of taking them down. This is what Brexit voters wanted. Barriers mean more costs for consumers. Trade deals are designed to remove them and make for easier and thus cheaper trade.

We absolutely did this to ourselves. No other country has ever made a deal like us which was designed legally to make it harder and more expensive.

IClaudine · 30/04/2024 08:20

It is very thoughtful of the asylum seekers to do a runner during an election week.

Well done Sunak! What a triumph of a plan.

DuncinToffee · 30/04/2024 08:33

Those stickers are horrible @MrsMurphyIWish

You are poor so cannot be trusted with a choice.

OP posts:
DuncinToffee · 30/04/2024 08:36

I know Brexit is bad; but honestly did people think that making our relationship harder and trade more difficult with the EU was going to be cheaper?

That is what people were told.

They knew what they voted for

Project Fear Hmm

OP posts:
DuncinToffee · 30/04/2024 08:46

RafaistheKingofClay · 29/04/2024 22:35

https://twitter.com/matt_dathan/status/1785049182060916929

Oh dear. The government can only locate 38% of the migrants it intends to send to Rwanda.

Who could have seen that coming given they’d already admitted losing loads.

The irony, also from that tweet

The document also reveals concerns that MPs could succeed in delaying or cancelling the deportation of migrants by submitting last-minute representations.

OP posts:
fabio12 · 30/04/2024 08:57

Again they don't seem to understand that the risk of crossing the channel is better than being in a camp in France or in the countries they came from.
We must have the most expensive refugees in the world! If only it wasn't being spazzed up the wall on flights and was being put into councils to actually home them.

https://www.shropshirestar.com/news/uk-news/2024/04/29/if-300-people-are-sent-to-rwanda-it-would-cost-2-million-per-person/

If 300 people are sent to Rwanda it would cost £2 million per person

If more people are sent, the cost per person would fall.

https://www.shropshirestar.com/news/uk-news/2024/04/29/if-300-people-are-sent-to-rwanda-it-would-cost-2-million-per-person

DuncinToffee · 30/04/2024 09:00

Another Brexit bonus......

OP posts:
fabio12 · 30/04/2024 09:02

This is interesting. I note

  • The departure rate from Rwanda. If a person relocated to Rwanda decides to leave the East African country, the UK would stop its per-person payments to Rwanda and pay £10,000 to facilitate the person’s voluntary departure. As a result, the more relocated people decide to leave Rwanda, the lower the cost of the policy.
So, we are relying on Rwanda being honest about the amount of refugees still there too? What could possibly go wrong?

What's that saying, give a refugee £10,000 and watch him settle into work?

https://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/commentaries/the-uncertain-financial-implications-of-the-uks-rwanda-policy/#:~:text=The%20finances%20of%20the%20Rwanda%20policy,-Under%20the%20Rwanda&text=According%20to%20an%20investigation%20by,people%20are%20relocated%20to%20Rwanda.

The uncertain financial implications of the UK’s Rwanda policy - Migration Observatory

This commentary examines the financial impacts of the UK’s policy to send some asylum seekers and irregular migrants to Rwanda.

https://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/commentaries/the-uncertain-financial-implications-of-the-uks-rwanda-policy#:~:text=The%20finances%20of%20the%20Rwanda%20policy,-Under%20the%20Rwanda&text=According%20to%20an%20investigation%20by,people%20are%20relocated%20to%20Rwanda.

DuncinToffee · 30/04/2024 09:10

Makes you wonder who negotiated this deal,

We already had Australia and New Zealand TV laughing at our trade deal.

OP posts:
SerendipityJane · 30/04/2024 09:14

So, we are relying on Rwanda being honest about the amount of refugees still there too? What could possibly go wrong?

Rwanda have stitched the UK up like a kipper - and they aren't so dumb as to not see the irony in that statement. The UK ha basically fallen for a pretty unsophisticated version of the Nigerian Prince scam emails that used to do the rounds.

GoldenTrout · 30/04/2024 09:15

JessS1990 · 29/04/2024 18:44

This is what I dont understand. Sunak appears to be in anever ending scrap with reform to see who can be most right wing, whilst entirely ignoring the majority of voters in the centre.

He did this with the leadership election - a sudden lurch to the right in a desperate bid to win votes away from Truss. He doesn't seem to realise that this time around the electorate is not the Bufton-Tuftons who pay their Conservative Party membership fees.

bombastix · 30/04/2024 09:15

DuncinToffee · 30/04/2024 09:10

Makes you wonder who negotiated this deal,

We already had Australia and New Zealand TV laughing at our trade deal.

In some respects it's okay. Zero tariffs for example. But in every other respect it is poor because the logic of it is that the UK must take on the functions of the EU and either replicate or enhance them to make it work. So it is expensive and more difficult. I do not think that this was a good idea. It is more bureaucratic and difficult. That is "sovereignty" in practice

GoldenTrout · 30/04/2024 09:20

RafaistheKingofClay · 29/04/2024 22:35

https://twitter.com/matt_dathan/status/1785049182060916929

Oh dear. The government can only locate 38% of the migrants it intends to send to Rwanda.

Who could have seen that coming given they’d already admitted losing loads.

And the likelihood is that the people they can locate are the families who are settled somewhere because their children are in school etc. It's not going to be a good optic hauling children out of those schools and shoving them on planes, as opposed to the single young men the Tories were no doubt hoping to focus on.

SerendipityJane · 30/04/2024 09:32

GoldenTrout · 30/04/2024 09:20

And the likelihood is that the people they can locate are the families who are settled somewhere because their children are in school etc. It's not going to be a good optic hauling children out of those schools and shoving them on planes, as opposed to the single young men the Tories were no doubt hoping to focus on.

Knock knock.
"Is <asylum seeker> here ?"
<answer in a language the officers can't understand>
There goes 2 man days

Knock knock.
"Is <asylum seeker> here ?"
"They've popped to the shops. No idea when they will be back. You can wait."
There goes 2 man days

Knock knock.
"Is <asylum seeker> here ?"
"Here I am"
"We are removing you to an approved asylum centre"
"Oh, OK. Very good"
<some point down the line fingerprints show they have the wrong man>
There goes 2 man days

MNetters are free to carry on this Rish! inspired version of "I went to the market"

DuncinToffee · 30/04/2024 09:37

Grin SerendipityJane

OP posts:
SerendipityJane · 30/04/2024 09:38

DuncinToffee · 30/04/2024 09:37

Grin SerendipityJane

It wasn't hard. Pretty much a retread of why the poll tax was never going to work.

borntobequiet · 30/04/2024 09:48

I know Brexit is bad; but honestly did people think that making our relationship harder and trade more difficult with the EU was going to be cheaper?

They must have, because they were endlessly proclaiming it on here.

IClaudine · 30/04/2024 09:52

GoldenTrout · 30/04/2024 09:20

And the likelihood is that the people they can locate are the families who are settled somewhere because their children are in school etc. It's not going to be a good optic hauling children out of those schools and shoving them on planes, as opposed to the single young men the Tories were no doubt hoping to focus on.

I hope that local people might turn out to protest if that happens.

Alexandra2001 · 30/04/2024 09:58

borntobequiet · 30/04/2024 09:48

I know Brexit is bad; but honestly did people think that making our relationship harder and trade more difficult with the EU was going to be cheaper?

They must have, because they were endlessly proclaiming it on here.

Many people did not believe Politicians would lie in such a brazen way.

Then there were the better off, who can afford higher prices in return for not being ruled by foreign courts/unelected etc blah blah bla... until they found all about the 90 day rule and wrecked retirement plans...

I think Brexit and its clear failure, is associated with the Tories and thats one reason (among many) why, despite a hefty cut in taxes, their polling is still shit.

RafaistheKingofClay · 30/04/2024 10:15

IClaudine · 30/04/2024 08:20

It is very thoughtful of the asylum seekers to do a runner during an election week.

Well done Sunak! What a triumph of a plan.

Edited

I’m not sure they have done a runner this week. The Home Office have had to admit before that they’ve lost track of all the asylum seekers. It’s just that being the political genius that Rishi is he’s decided that an election week is a good week to emphasise this fact.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread