@uncomfortablydumb53 'Potential future emotional harm' is the reason my ex's children were removed too.
Don't get me wrong, I have no doubt my ex was far from a perfect Mother. Her marriage was on the rocks (her being gay likely had something to do with that!) and her husband was a schizophrenic and abused her in front of them-however they were removed once she'd left him and kept having to move house to avoid him finding them and causing them harm-he was very unwell.
What doesn't sit right with me, regarding the reason given, is that being taken from that family unit (there are four of them, aged from 3 to 13 at the time of removal) has caused them so so much emotional harm. I truly believe much more than had they stayed together and perhaps had to move house a lot/experienced some unsavoury and undesirable things.
They were all separated, for a start. All went to different foster families initially and were moved between many until they reached the age they could leave, and later two to children's homes. Little to no effort was made to keep them in one another's lives. Four siblings who loved one another.
Two of them were abused while in foster care.
All four of them have emotional and mental health problems now.
Sure, that might have happened even if they'd stayed-but removing them to prevent emotional harm and then putting them into a different but worse situation? What's the point of that?
And as soon as they were old enough to be on fb etc, they were looking for their Mum, who despite not being great and having some problems, they missed and loved.
I am childless. I appreciate that there are some lovely individual SWs who do their best-they're (much like the police IME) the sort of institution where the ones doing their best and being congruent and hardworking are driven out by the fact that the upper echelons are generally corrupt and slapdash. I do not trust SS one bit.