Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Missing Titanic Submarine- new thread

1000 replies

YoSof · 20/06/2023 22:37

I see the first one is full, is there a new one?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
33
Iridescentsy · 21/06/2023 09:46

Tremel · 21/06/2023 08:17

Did the migrants drowning at sea get this kind of rescue effort and dedicated news channel? No they certainly did not, but screw them, they are poor. All the posters fawningly talking about the importance of the "research and development" as if this wasn't just a few rich, deadened thrill seekers wanting to do something no ordinary person could ever afford to do.

How many thousands of dollars should someone have paid for their journey to get onto an unseaworthy vessel before we say we won’t help them?

PlantDoctor · 21/06/2023 09:47

Harping · 21/06/2023 09:46

Isn’t sos just three short bangs. Three long ones and another three short.

but it sounds like this is not normal protocol in this situation

Yup, good to remember for emergencies

Tremel · 21/06/2023 09:47

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

SheilaFentiman · 21/06/2023 09:47

kirinm · 21/06/2023 09:29

I'm a bit confused by some of the reporting. This presumably isn't the first time anyone has reached the wreck? As one of the people in the sub has supposedly seen the wreck multiple times.

So what makes this such an unusual voyage (?). Is it that it is carrying non professional divers or the sub itself?

Additionally, it looks like the Titan did missions only in 2021 and 2022, and this was the first of 18 they were hoping to do from 2023 onwards. Those who have been down multiple times will have done so in other vehicles as well.

There is nothing inherently wrong in using parts that have been developed by other companies (eg video game controller) as millions will have been spent on that R+D and it may well be one of the most responsive systems out there to human touch.

Theoldgreygoose · 21/06/2023 09:49

darkmodeon · 21/06/2023 09:14

Start one yourself then?

There wouldn't be any point. There was a thread started earlier this year about a disaster in another part of the world, and the posts from people in the UK were in the main absolutely awful, and the person who did start the thread was dumbfounded by the responses.

Tremel · 21/06/2023 09:51

Theoldgreygoose · 21/06/2023 09:49

There wouldn't be any point. There was a thread started earlier this year about a disaster in another part of the world, and the posts from people in the UK were in the main absolutely awful, and the person who did start the thread was dumbfounded by the responses.

Yes. There's a definite undercurrent bubbling on this thread as well whenever migrants are mentioned.

Iridescentsy · 21/06/2023 09:51

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

You seem to have an awful lot to say on the subject. No answer to that then?

SunnyEgg · 21/06/2023 09:51

Theoldgreygoose · 21/06/2023 09:49

There wouldn't be any point. There was a thread started earlier this year about a disaster in another part of the world, and the posts from people in the UK were in the main absolutely awful, and the person who did start the thread was dumbfounded by the responses.

The NZ one? They made the mistake of downplaying a much bigger tragedy.

Bharath · 21/06/2023 09:52

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

ThreeRingCircus · 21/06/2023 09:52

Banging in a pattern, every 30 minutes does indicate human activity rather than anything else. Which is absolutely horrendous to think that they may be aware of what is happening to them.

RiffRaffBananas · 21/06/2023 09:53

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Please take your coat with you on your way out. And close the door after you.

kirinm · 21/06/2023 09:53

@SheilaFentiman so if other vehicles have been down that deep previously, why is so much being made of the depth at which the sub might be? There are reports that sonars etc won't pick up noise at that depth and that there are few mechanisms for rescuing if that is where the sub is.

Apologies if these are all totally basic questions.

WunWun · 21/06/2023 09:53

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

What a horrible thing to say.

TallulahBetty · 21/06/2023 09:54

The stuff of nightmares. You could write this as a horror film script and it would be awful enough then.

I feel sorry for their families, especially the woman who stands to lose her husband AND son. And for what? An expensive, self-indulgent folly.

SunnyEgg · 21/06/2023 09:54

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Just resist the need to go there. It’s not welcome

OnlyOpenMouthToChangeFeet · 21/06/2023 09:55

kirinm · 21/06/2023 09:53

@SheilaFentiman so if other vehicles have been down that deep previously, why is so much being made of the depth at which the sub might be? There are reports that sonars etc won't pick up noise at that depth and that there are few mechanisms for rescuing if that is where the sub is.

Apologies if these are all totally basic questions.

The sonar buoys they have dropped can detect down to 13,000 feet. But it's such a vast area. They're looking for a 22 foot converted toilet roll in an area the size of Belgium.

Theoldgreygoose · 21/06/2023 09:56

Bluedab · 21/06/2023 09:21

@IfOnlyOurEyesSawSouls i see a lot of people mentioning the titanic area is a grave site and it doesnt sit well with some that people want to visit it. There are lots of 'grave site' tours - auschwitz, the site of twin towers, pompai etc. I agree people should be respectful when visiting these sites but whats the problem with visiting?

Maybe the fact that you don't have to risk your life to visit those other sites? The people on the Titan didn't go down there out of respect for anyone on the Titanic, they went down because they wanted to do something most people never get the chance to do. Which obviously doesn't mean they shouldn't have all stops pulled out to rescue them, but they shouldn't have been there in the first place.

Coconutsandpalmtrees · 21/06/2023 09:56

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Vile post. Think about what they must be going through.

Dinobore · 21/06/2023 09:56

To be honest a lot of the interest in this is because it's an unusual situation- titanic also peaks a lot of people's interests and I think the fear and claustrophobia is something lots are terrified of so it appeals to that sort of can't help reading about it even though I'm scared element humans often enjoy. Its not a situation the vast vast majority of people will ever be in so don't need to actively fear it, although I'm sure no one wishes them harm also worth considering I suspect deep down lots recognise its sort of their own choice ergo fault. Less emotion attached to rubbernecking.

Lots of people dissociate from the migrant drownings and the dangerous and scary conditions they often are forced to travel in because it takes a bit more soul searching and emotion to recognise these are humans dying in horrific circumstances in hope of a better life. Its easy to be out of sight out of mind rather than face the injustice. Of course some people are just ignorant and xenophobic and don't care one iota, I think genuine psychopaths are rarer than people who are self preserving.

TallulahBetty · 21/06/2023 09:56

kirinm · 21/06/2023 09:53

@SheilaFentiman so if other vehicles have been down that deep previously, why is so much being made of the depth at which the sub might be? There are reports that sonars etc won't pick up noise at that depth and that there are few mechanisms for rescuing if that is where the sub is.

Apologies if these are all totally basic questions.

isn't it because all other similar journeys have been made by official, scientific research projects? In proper, approved vessels?

Tremel · 21/06/2023 09:56

I think @Bharath is deliberately trying to get the thread deleted.

YesSirMam · 21/06/2023 09:56

The banging noises are so reassuring. Praying they can find them today & start the process of rescuing them. I can’t even imagine the fear. Those poor people. Let’s not forget there is a father & son on board. The young lad is only 19. How terrifying for all. Praying for them all today

TallulahBetty · 21/06/2023 09:58

My turn for a stupid question, which I have tried to find the answer for.

Were they 'dropped' or launched directly over the Titanic site? If so, how is the search area so wife - can they drift at the bottom very far?

notimagain · 21/06/2023 09:58

Tremel · 21/06/2023 09:19

Of course not. I mean the ridiculous concept that as they are out training anyway this mission won't cost much.

I'm not sure discussing costs is particularly appropriate ATM but given it keeps being flagged up...

Take the P-3s (the anti-submarine, ASW, aircraft) as an example....their squadron(s)/crews will have had a training schedule that may well have been written up weeks ago.....for example aircraft X with crew Y may originally have been planned to fly 5-10 hours on an ASW exercise this afternoon off the Canadian Coast....

Cost to the Canadian Tax payer for that training exercise X tens of of thousands of Canadian Dollars.

Suddenly this incident arises, training schedule goes in the bin.

Instead same aircraft X with same Crew Y gets tasked with flying 5-10 hours doing Search patterns over the incident scene. Now there may or may not be an increase in some incidental cost but we are not talking costs increasing by an order f magnitude for that flight because it task has been changed.

Cost to the Canadian Taxpayer will still be X tens of thousands of Canadian Dollars.

tortoishelll · 21/06/2023 09:58

I believe they traveled out to the wreck, so they'd have had a journey to get there first. Am I right in thinking there was then a 4.5/5hr timeframe in which it took them to get from the surface to the titanic?

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.