Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Boris stands down as MP with immediate effect part 2

1000 replies

IClaudine · 13/06/2023 08:56

New thread!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
44
IClaudine · 13/06/2023 13:11

And if you believe Johnson didn't mean to lie, you clearly don't know much about his modus operandi. Lying is in his nature, always has been.

OP posts:
jgw1 · 13/06/2023 13:13

IClaudine · 13/06/2023 13:09

Johnson lied to the House. Deliberately. Is that not serious in your view?

I think you are being unfair to Johnson. He lies so frequently he probably does it by accident without even realising.

I understand that is the defence that his fans would like to put forward.

Alexandra2001 · 13/06/2023 13:19

Clavinova · 13/06/2023 10:05

Alexandra2001
Most certainly is, we have your allegations and the police investigation on both men...

Johnson found Guilty.

Starmer found Not Guilty, thats our system, over time, maybe you will learn to accept this & you will find some peace?

You are the one who seems to be on edge, not me. As I have already stated - whether Starmer was found to have broken the law or not is a moot point - he clearly made false statements - i.e. he lied. My previous posts for context;

Once a liar - always a liar?

Well, that's rather worrying - we know that Keir Starmer told a string of lies regarding his meal in Durham: he lied about how many people were there (he said 'about six' - there were seventeen people including Starmer), he lied when he said his 'hotel wasn't serving food that evening' (the hotel was serving food on the terrace until 9pm), he lied when he said 'all the hotels and restaurants in Durham were shut' (they were open for outside eating in groups of up to six - Starmer ate at an outside restaurant in Hull the evening before, and then posed for publicity photos, socially distanced, wearing a thick coat, in the cold), he lied when he suggested that the curry was impromptu (it was planned in advance)... Not to mention that Labour head office lied when they said Angela Rayner wasn't there.
Whether Starmer was fined or not is irrelevant - he still told a string of lies - for whatever reason.

As far as I am aware, Durham Police allowed Starmer an exemption for work purposes - that doesn't mean he had no other options, and he clearly tried to cover up how many people were there.

Lol! i do enjoy your posts! for many years now, they are always highly entertaining.

Like i said, for the umpteenth time, Starmer was investigated and found not to have breached Covid Laws, with acceptance comes peace!

mibbelucieachwell · 13/06/2023 13:30

@IClaudine Johnson lied to the House. Deliberately. Is that not serious in your view?

Johnson claims he felt it wasn't a lie. So he was, on this occasion at least, pure of heart. Incompetent, as to everyone else it was clearly a lie but his pureness of heart must surely count for a lot. All he ultimately wanted was to deliver for the people while keeping staff morale high.

Anne232 · 13/06/2023 13:33

That man has done nothing for the country - he messed up Covid, and frankly I can't think of a single thing he did for the good of the country. He's also an embarrassment on TV - why does he portray hoimself and a bumbling toff?! Who even likes that?

jgw1 · 13/06/2023 13:37

Anne232 · 13/06/2023 13:33

That man has done nothing for the country - he messed up Covid, and frankly I can't think of a single thing he did for the good of the country. He's also an embarrassment on TV - why does he portray hoimself and a bumbling toff?! Who even likes that?

Fortunately you don't need to think of the good things that Boris has done for the country as other posters have already provided them in great detail.
To save you reading all those threads I will list them all here:

That's the lot.

Alexandra2001 · 13/06/2023 13:37

I think what we are all guilty of missing here is that Johnson has escaped punishment for what should be a very serious offence, which in any serious democracy, carry a custodial sentence.

Johnson deliberately misled parliament, for no good reason (i can see certain national security issues might justify lying)

He resigns and escapes all censure, laughable and needs to be addressed by Parliament.

Alexandra2001 · 13/06/2023 13:38

@jgw1 An exhaustive list.....

Alexandra2001 · 13/06/2023 13:40

TBF to Johnson, Ukraine and the early support he gave to them was a good thing but of course, it was pure opportunism, he saw which way the wind was blowing and charged out in front shouting "follow me!"

He didn't show the same judgement when he allowed Putins money to go into the Tory party.....

jgw1 · 13/06/2023 13:40

Alexandra2001 · 13/06/2023 13:38

@jgw1 An exhaustive list.....

An utterly comphrensive summary of all the achievements his many fans have given during his time in government.

IClaudine · 13/06/2023 13:43

mibbelucieachwell · 13/06/2023 13:30

@IClaudine Johnson lied to the House. Deliberately. Is that not serious in your view?

Johnson claims he felt it wasn't a lie. So he was, on this occasion at least, pure of heart. Incompetent, as to everyone else it was clearly a lie but his pureness of heart must surely count for a lot. All he ultimately wanted was to deliver for the people while keeping staff morale high.

I can't decide if you are serious or not!

OP posts:
Kiwano · 13/06/2023 13:47

Clavinova · 13/06/2023 11:14

Kiwano
He didn't break the law. It's not a moot point.

Tell that to the other poster - for a start, I was replying to a post on Boris Johnson and Michael Howard - telling lies about your extramarital affair isn't against the law either. If you want to police the thread, you've got to be even-handed with everyone, not just those posters you disagree with.

I'm sorry, your point is totally eluding me. The quote you give, relating to Starmer, is simply a statement of fact.

Kiwano · 13/06/2023 13:51

mibbelucieachwell · 13/06/2023 13:07

Tbf to Johnson - he was adamant that his incorrect statements to Parliament weren't intentional lies. Surely this incompetence isn't as bad as Starmer's 'string of lies'?

But it appears that two advisers briefed him before the Parliament session that he could not say what he did say, because it would be a big fat lie. Unless he is going to claim an exceptionally short memory or a plot by those advisers, he must have been intending to lie. And the conspiracy accusation will hardly work given that the advisers simply gave him what was indubitably correct advice.

Notonthestairs · 13/06/2023 14:05

"But it appears that two advisers briefed him before the Parliament session that he could not say what he did say, because it would be a big fat lie. Unless he is going to claim an exceptionally short memory or a plot by those advisers, he must have been intending to lie. And the conspiracy accusation will hardly work given that the advisers simply gave him what was indubitably correct advice."

Not only this. The Times reported that the "all guidance was folllowed" claim was struck out of a draft of his statement to Parliament. Evidence that he had been informed that he should not make that claim. But he did it anyway. More than once.

jgw1 · 13/06/2023 14:08

Kiwano · 13/06/2023 13:47

I'm sorry, your point is totally eluding me. The quote you give, relating to Starmer, is simply a statement of fact.

Facts?
Unimportant.

We are much more interested in irrelevant links.

DuncinToffee · 13/06/2023 14:10

mibbelucieachwell · 13/06/2023 13:30

@IClaudine Johnson lied to the House. Deliberately. Is that not serious in your view?

Johnson claims he felt it wasn't a lie. So he was, on this occasion at least, pure of heart. Incompetent, as to everyone else it was clearly a lie but his pureness of heart must surely count for a lot. All he ultimately wanted was to deliver for the people while keeping staff morale high.

Brave Sir Boris, the purest of hearts, bravest of braaaave Grin

mibbelucieachwell · 13/06/2023 14:26

It might be that the stress of working so hard affected Johnson's memory. Elevated levels of cortisol are known to impair cognitive function. He really was working tremendously hard in very difficult circumstances and having to rally the troops and keep spirits up must have been very challenging.

I realise that many people were in extremely difficult circumstances and working very hard indeed but Johnson was in such an important position he surely deserves to be exempted from some of the rules that apply to ordinary people.

pointythings · 13/06/2023 14:30

mibbelucieachwell · 13/06/2023 14:26

It might be that the stress of working so hard affected Johnson's memory. Elevated levels of cortisol are known to impair cognitive function. He really was working tremendously hard in very difficult circumstances and having to rally the troops and keep spirits up must have been very challenging.

I realise that many people were in extremely difficult circumstances and working very hard indeed but Johnson was in such an important position he surely deserves to be exempted from some of the rules that apply to ordinary people.

Wow, that really taking Boris apologism to the next level. Stand aside, Clav and Janiie, the true master is here.

ilovesooty · 13/06/2023 14:30

mibbelucieachwell · 13/06/2023 14:26

It might be that the stress of working so hard affected Johnson's memory. Elevated levels of cortisol are known to impair cognitive function. He really was working tremendously hard in very difficult circumstances and having to rally the troops and keep spirits up must have been very challenging.

I realise that many people were in extremely difficult circumstances and working very hard indeed but Johnson was in such an important position he surely deserves to be exempted from some of the rules that apply to ordinary people.

This isn't serious is it?

pointythings · 13/06/2023 14:33

Also @mibbelucieachwell if Boris can be given exemption because of the extreme stress, would you agree the same must apply to the dancing nurses? I realise they were 'only' saving people's actual lives, but some generosity of spirit could be applied.

jgw1 · 13/06/2023 14:36

mibbelucieachwell · 13/06/2023 14:26

It might be that the stress of working so hard affected Johnson's memory. Elevated levels of cortisol are known to impair cognitive function. He really was working tremendously hard in very difficult circumstances and having to rally the troops and keep spirits up must have been very challenging.

I realise that many people were in extremely difficult circumstances and working very hard indeed but Johnson was in such an important position he surely deserves to be exempted from some of the rules that apply to ordinary people.

In your next post please include about Johnson's function in keeping the pot plants watered. Ta.

jgw1 · 13/06/2023 14:36

ilovesooty · 13/06/2023 14:30

This isn't serious is it?

Its very good though, I'd be proud of it.

Rhondaa · 13/06/2023 14:44

'In your next post please include about Johnson's function in keeping the pot plants watered. Ta.'

They probably just tell Sir Keir Starmer to have regular drinks of water tbh.

Rhondaa · 13/06/2023 14:46

pointythings · 13/06/2023 14:33

Also @mibbelucieachwell if Boris can be given exemption because of the extreme stress, would you agree the same must apply to the dancing nurses? I realise they were 'only' saving people's actual lives, but some generosity of spirit could be applied.

Don't mention the attention seeking, highly unprofessional and inappropriate dancing nurses! It is verboten.

DuncinToffee · 13/06/2023 14:50

Rhondaa · 13/06/2023 14:46

Don't mention the attention seeking, highly unprofessional and inappropriate dancing nurses! It is verboten.

Janiie, we now your opinion of dancing nurses, how do you feel about PM's misleading Parliament?

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.