I remember when Russia first invaded Ukraine, and crying while watching this on BBC news about babies who were born to surrogates and were stranded:
When I first read this thread, I struggled with the maths a bit: this couple choose to use a surrogate in Ukraine, after the war started?! That is honestly the most fucked up way I've ever heard of someone having a baby.
I'm really not sure how comfortable I am with the concept of surrogacy in general. I was adopted soon after birth. I think it has definitely had an effect on my attachment style, I'm very much anxious avoidant. Interestingly, when I first looked into counselling, I discovered that therapists require specialised training (and bizarrely, also need to be Ofsted registered) to be 'allowed' to provide adoption related counselling to adoptees, adoptive parents and birth parents. I wonder if that rule will apply to surrogate babies in the future? Though I hope not, hopefully that rule will be cancelled sooner rather than later, as it reinforces the idea that adopted people are fundamentally fucked up. There were also less than 50 suitable therapists in the whole of the UK when I looked into it, and none anywhere near me.
Link about the rule for anyone interested:
https://www.bacp.co.uk/news/news-from-bacp/2023/11-january-positive-changes-proposed-on-restrictions-to-adoption-related-counselling/
I was adopted years ago, but now it seems that the process goes through your life with a fine tooth comb (as it should). A few people have commented saying why didn't this couple adopt instead of buying a baby from a war zone? Simple. They undoubtedly would have been turned down for adoption. If you're the type of person who would buy a baby from a way zone, then risk your own safety to go and collect your purchase when you already have a child at home who needs you, I hope to God that today's adoption screening process would veto you. Selfish fuckers.