NEW: Former Tory MP Owen Paterson has released a statement on why he's taking his case on lobbying to the European Court of Human Rights:
"The irony that Mr Paterson, a vocal opponent of European institutions, should be seeking the help of the ECHR is not lost."
twitter.com/sebastianepayne/status/1597167204004352001?s=46&t=bSLTGBA45zmpGDZasTpv0A
Tweet includes letter from Patersons lawyers who seem to have framed their argument quite similarly to Johnson's supposedly devastating legal opinion (Panick).
Random thought about Patterson claim to Strasbourg. His claim is against Standards Committee.
The Privileges Committee used to be part of the Standards Committee but it was felt that lay members should not get a vote on parliamentary privilege. So the two committees were separated.
However the Committees have the same MPs appointed, same chair and appear to share similar mechanisms. The difference is that Standards have lay members.
Seems to me that a case about the Standards Committee will reflect on Privileges Committee.
Just wondering whether Patterson claim is a bit of a stalking horse or at least useful to Johnson.
Nothing to back that up. Just pondering.