Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Boris Johnson, parties and the Sue Gray report fall out. Thread 6

1000 replies

DuncinToffee · 01/06/2022 20:18

Previous thread
www.mumsnet.com/talk/_chat/4552700-boris-johnson-fpns-and-sue-gray-report-due-thread-5

We continue

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
Notonthestairs · 14/06/2022 08:43

Sliver of good news - Harriet Harman will chair privileges committee investigation in to whether Johnson lied to Parliament. Report due late Autumn - wonder if it will come out before or after conference season.

Roussette · 14/06/2022 08:46

Liz Truss tying herself up in knots on breakfast news this morning.

On Rwanda, at the moment it is 7 on the flight leaving tonight, possibly going down to 3. Apart from the policy itself which is disgusting (and has been condemned by Church and 120 charities), I find it obscene that a massive jet is flying thousands of miles with hardly anyone on board. The cost is horrendous and it will not make a jot of difference to what is happening as far as immigration.

I honestly think this is being done to appease the fanbase and for PPatel to look like she's doing something. I just don't trust this shitshow of a Government on anything.

Notonthestairs · 14/06/2022 09:01

yes it is amazing that they can find money to spaff for forced removals and to cover for Rishi's 11 billion pound losses.
The court cases aren't over though - the emergency injunctions may have been turned down but the policy itself hasn't yet been determined (I think).

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

prettybird · 14/06/2022 09:06

My thinking, listening to the Appeal Court judge - which was severely constrained in what it could consider - was that he gave a road map of what should be put forward in opposition during the judicial review.

It was along the lines of "these are the aspects that we weren't able to consider in this appeal but they are still important matters of law." (I'm paraphrasing).

DuncinToffee · 14/06/2022 09:10

Truss kept defending it by saying they want to punish the traffickers.

Makes sense then to actually punish their victims instead.

All that money wasted to prove a non existing point but no free school meals for children

OP posts:
DuncinToffee · 14/06/2022 09:15

The deportation going ahead also doesn’t mean the policy is lawful. There will be a hearing on this next month.

OP posts:
prettybird · 14/06/2022 09:29

I was reading that the plane will be coming back with c50 Congolese refugees as the agreement with Rwanda is a reciprocal one.

So 50-4 (the latest number expected to be on the plane) = 46 more refugees in the UK. Confused

Has anyone seen any confirmation of this?

Blossomtoes · 14/06/2022 09:31

Notonthestairs · 14/06/2022 08:14

I've had 4 days off social media. Now trying to catch up. What an absolute shitshow - all to appease the ERG and keep Johnson in his position.

And even that isn’t working, Steve Baker wants him gone.

DuncinToffee · 14/06/2022 09:49

I have seen similar claims prettybird but no official confirmation.

OP posts:
DuncinToffee · 14/06/2022 09:51

Today is the 5th anniversary of the Grenfell Towers fire Sad

OP posts:
prettybird · 14/06/2022 09:53

DuncinToffee · 14/06/2022 09:49

I have seen similar claims prettybird but no official confirmation.

I'm sure it's not something that this execrable Government wants publicised Hmm

Cornettoninja · 14/06/2022 09:55

prettybird · 14/06/2022 09:06

My thinking, listening to the Appeal Court judge - which was severely constrained in what it could consider - was that he gave a road map of what should be put forward in opposition during the judicial review.

It was along the lines of "these are the aspects that we weren't able to consider in this appeal but they are still important matters of law." (I'm paraphrasing).

That’s a good summary, did you pick up any notion of what they weren’t able to consider?

Sources at the moment just feel like an overwhelming collection of protests - getting on with the job is working out well.

prettybird · 14/06/2022 10:01

Can't remember @Cornettoninja - I'm not a lawyer. It was just the impression that I got.

Cornettoninja · 14/06/2022 11:07

Ah fair enough @prettybird

DuncinToffee · 14/06/2022 12:22

It's going well today

Boris Johnson’s spokesman unable to point to a single independent legal expert who says the Prime Minister's plan to break his deal with the EU complies with international law.

(Adam Bienkov)

Here is Lord Geidt…

The Govt’s Independent Advisor

The one who is supposed to hold the PM and Ministers to account

Telling us that the ‘independent’ bit of his title is just some meaningless fluff that came with the job…

t.co/2FHeIgRcrj

(Marina Purkiss)

OP posts:
DuncinToffee · 14/06/2022 13:57

Latest update on the Rwanda deportations

UK Supreme Court says there is only ONE appellant from the case that came before the Court of Appeal yesterday who is still facing removal to Rwanda.

OP posts:
DuncinToffee · 14/06/2022 14:06

DuncinToffee · 14/06/2022 13:57

Latest update on the Rwanda deportations

UK Supreme Court says there is only ONE appellant from the case that came before the Court of Appeal yesterday who is still facing removal to Rwanda.

Sorry, I cut off this bit at the end

It’s possible there are other people who were not part of that legal challenge.

OP posts:
Cornettoninja · 14/06/2022 14:06

That’s bittersweet news @DuncinToffee. I can’t imagine what’s going through the head of that one person… the whole thing is just dreadful.

Fingers crossed they don’t use them as a political point and run a flight just for them.

Cornettoninja · 14/06/2022 14:07

Ah - just saw your second post! It’s such a tangle of information isn’t it?

DuncinToffee · 14/06/2022 14:18

Yes it is, could be 7 or just 1, it's all so horrible Angry

And then there is this as well
Supreme Court refuses permission to hear further appeal

but

in part on the basis that the Home Secretary has given an undertaken that appellant will be returned in the event that the High Court holds policy unlawful at substantive hearing

Imagine having to go through this inhumane process only to be told it was illegal so now you can come back to the UK

OP posts:
DuncinToffee · 14/06/2022 18:53

This seems reliable information

NEW: Number on the Rwanda flight now DOWN to 6 - comes after the move from the European Court of Human Rights to grant injunction which I just tweeted.
twitter.com/ShehabKhan/status/1536761984594608138?t=A0GtbMQdicG8RD7oDgXbFQ&s=19

OP posts:
Roussette · 14/06/2022 19:00

twitter.com/LBC/status/1536758836102578176?t=p3PXzYEMxA2Orfi1idsLnA&s=19

If this is true, and I don't doubt it, it's horrendous
Those leaving on the flight are a married man with children, who has relatives in Carlisle, some who have been victims of torture, two have family in UK, a Syrian refugee who refused to join the murderous army and who is on hunger strike, and some who are suicidal

I feel sick about what we have become

Blossomtoes · 14/06/2022 19:08

Of all the things this disgusting apology for a government has done this is the worst. It makes me so ashamed.

ClaudineClare · 14/06/2022 19:18

Those poor people. Angela Rayner was right all the time. The Tory party is scum.

Cornettoninja · 14/06/2022 19:18

At this point I have to agree with LBC host JOB, the whole point of the Rwanda scheme is to appease the thirsty little Englanders and to display our cruelness, sorry, determination to ‘get the job done’. At any conceivable cost.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread