@Tuba437
With Zelenskey claims about being ready to compromise on crimea and Dombas and the sense he doesn't fancy joining Nato anymore. Mixed with the high keel talks tomo between foreign ministers in Turkey. Is this our best chance of some sort of negotiated peace tomorrow?
Tomorrow?
No chance.
IMO, the end of this war will result in some kind of partition of Ukraine.
"The response that we are getting from the NATO countries is that they are not ready to even discuss having us in NATO, not for the next period of five or 10 years. We are ready to discuss some non-NATO models. For example, there could be direct guarantees by different countries like the U.S., China, UK, maybe Germany and France. We are open to discussing such things in a broader circle, not only in bilateral discussions with Russia but also with other partners."
Source: Ukrainian negotiator David Arakhamia
www.reuters.com/world/europe/ukraine-open-discussing-non-nato-models-negotiator-tells-fox-news-2022-03-06/
And:
"I have cooled down regarding this question a long time ago after we understood that ... NATO is not prepared to accept Ukraine. The alliance is afraid of controversial things, and confrontation with Russia.
I'm talking about security guarantees.
[Donbas and Luhansk] have not been recognized by anyone but Russia, these pseudo republics. But we can discuss and find the compromise on how these territories will live on."
"What is important to me is how the people in those territories are going to live who want to be part of Ukraine, who in Ukraine will say that they want to have them in.
So the question is more difficult than simply acknowledging them.
"This is another ultimatum and we are not prepared for ultimatums. What needs to be done is for President Putin to start talking, start the dialogue instead of living in the informational bubble without oxygen."
Source: Ukrainian President Zelensky
www.france24.com/en/live-news/20220308-in-nod-to-russia-ukraine-says-no-longer-insisting-on-nato-membership
In other words, Ukraine wants a security guarantee agreement from the United States, United Kingdom, France and so on on a personal State to State level.
With zero involvement from NATO.
Zelensky also seems to be open to discussing the possibility of Ukrainian partition which is something I discussed on the previous page or two as the most likely outcome.
But partition is not easy or simple to do given both Russia and Ukraine will have a significant minority in either state who don't want to be part of one or the other.
So, it looks to me that Ukraine is talking about:
-
Security guarantee for Ukrainian Security as a state similar to the Budapest Memorandum. But much more robust and binding on the West.
-
Security guarantees for any Ukrainian minority who might yet find themselves living on the Russian side of the border in the east.
As I said, I see this ending in partition with a smaller Ukraine and slightly bigger Russia.
In my view, it's definitely far, far too early to feel even slightly hopeful. Any negotiations between Ukraine and Russia has a very long way to go.
The longer Ukrainian resistance continues, the more they strengthen their hand at the negotiation table. Yet Ukraine still lacks the military capability to push Russia out of Ukraine completely.
That gives Russia a certain degree of bargaining power.
The idea of non-NATO security guaranteed arrangements for Ukraine is not new and has been done before - the Budapest Memorandum.
Russia repeatedly broke that agreement whereas the United States, United Kingdom and, to a lesser degree, France have not kept their side of the Security defence.
Neither has China who, along with France, didn't agree to do as much as Russia, USA and UK.
Putin's view is he blames various countries for the problems in Ukraine - USA, UK, Poland and even Lithuania. He really, really does not want the main western powers involved in Ukraine in any way.
Right now, I can't see him agreeing to it. He might well do if Russia is hurt enough economically, but that will take months to really bite.
By then, a lot of death and destruction will have occurred. As of this moment, Putin believes he can either take Kyiv OR raze important Ukrainian cities to the ground in a scorched earth policy.
Very difficult to see how a new security arrangement can or will be agreed right now.
How different would it fundamentally be from the failed 1994 Budapest Memorandum?
Russia has form for breaking such agreements. And now, the West has form for failing to properly live up to its own obligations.