@Cookiecrumble22
If putin was no more... would the war come to an end?
Is there any chance if ukraine winning this?
Why has putin stop most of social media to the Russian civilians?
How do Russian civilians actually feel about Russia invading ukraine?
To take the second one: is there a chance of Ukraine winning this?
If you asked anyone a week ago they would say pretty definitely no. However, now it depends a lot on what you mean by 'winning'.
In some cities Putin is now going for the Aleppo playbook, similar to what he did in Chechnya: google pictures of Grozny bombing--the buildings basically razed to the ground so the city is nothing but a pile of rubble. It's not as much 'winning' the city as wiping it off the face of the earth. Putin did not expect this level of resistance and is now essentially saying that he will wipe Ukraine off the map. His language has changed from 'saving' Ukrainians from Nazis to Ukraine not existing (see today's press conference, where he questions the statehood of Ukraine).
Russia also has chemical weapons, and we know they are happy to use them (ie they did in Syria). They have already used cluster munitions in Ukraine, as well as Thermobaric bombs. There is barely not one part of the rules of war that his regime have not broken--unfortunately it might be naive to even take nuclear fully of the table. That's not to say full nuclear bombs like seen in Japan, there are more targeted nuclear weaponry too. To be absolutely 100% clear here I'm not speaking of 'nuclear holocaust' etc I'm talking of use of targeted specific weaponry in areas of Ukraine. There have also been worrying signs of targeting power plants and damns, but again the panic here is a little overblown and worth looking at in detail, not headline.
However, Ukraine's army are in a quite strong position due to previous training by British army, and they are also being supplied vast amounts of weaponry. Some of it is better than what the Russians have--e.g. check out the success of Turkish Bayraktar drones. Also, Russian troops are abandoning vast amounts of weaponry including even machinery like surface to air with cost prices of 15-25 million dollars plus per item. I think the highest I've seen so far was dollar 65m.
Turkey has also closed off the straits to Russian navy, which is a big development. Ukraine has a tiny navy, they have already scuttled their main ship to avoid it falling into Russian hands.
Also, Ukraine has seen some 60,000 male citizens return in the last week to fight for the country. I don't have the official estimates for foreign fighters to hand but I think there are some 16,000 expected (many are military background with specific specialist skills). Plus we are seeing military from Belarus and Chechnya (who are both officially backing Russia) amongst others defecting to Ukraine. This means a possibility of getting e.g. former US forces who know how to handle special equipment, so we might see them getting better stuff.
Basically, the Russian military has not gone up against modern equipment for a long time and a lot of military commentators suggest the strength of the Russian military has been overblown for years. Check out pieces like this: rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/commentary/mysterious-case-missing-russian-air-force and rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/commentary/mysterious-case-missing-russian-air-force
There's also 'winning' a country vs holding it. If you google this you can find fascinating articles on the mathematics of how many troops you would need to hold a country, vs the population, which make Ukraine unholdable:
www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/2004/05/09/a-proven-formula-for-how-many-troops-we-need/5c6dbfc9-33f8-4648-bd07-40d244a1daa4/