Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

London Bridge incident **WARNING from MNHQ - graphic content**

455 replies

Beveren · 29/11/2019 14:27

Anyone there? Reports are sketchy at the moment. www.theguardian.com/uk-news/live/2019/nov/29/london-bridge-incident-police-city

OP posts:
Beveren · 30/11/2019 12:47

I'm wondering about security at the ex-offenders' event the terrorist attended. I would like to think that they couldn't have missed someone turning up with knives, tape and a fake suicide vest, which would suggest that he met someone later who handed them over, but it seems a complicated way of going about things given that he'd still have had to put the vest on and tape the knives to his hands.

OP posts:
retiredand · 30/11/2019 12:48

No you're right, nobody knew the bomb vest was a fake.

It's still highly inappropriate to give a serving prisoner an honour. He might benefit from his bravery at his next parole hearing.

Passthecherrycoke · 30/11/2019 12:52

Beveren he was out on license, tagged. I assume that means he wasn’t delivered to the conference from prison, but made his own way there from wherever he was living.

It’s an interesting point about the items he may or may not have taken in- who knows how he did it. I am not surprised if the venue didn’t have mental detectors- it’s a rather old building- but potentially it means that bags etc weren’t being searched

But then, at the same time I’m not sure anyone would’ve expected it to be a high security event, if these were people who were out in the community anyway. Obviously they were wrong, but you can see why it might not have been considered

retiredand · 30/11/2019 12:54

Did he enter the event?

Passthecherrycoke · 30/11/2019 12:56

I assume so, as it was so late in the day when it happened and the police were called to a “building next to London Bridge” which is, i assume, where he stabbed the 5 victims?

Of course he could’ve just gone crazy in the reception area having not yet gone through security or started the conference

MyFavouriteTimeOfYear · 30/11/2019 13:03

@HoldNose is a troll. No normal human being would think like that.

It's very simple..he was a terrorist. He has destroyed many lives. All innocent people!!
Not only the people that were murdered, their family, friends, work colleagues..Witnesses having to see what they did. The police. The AFO (they maybe trained to deal with situations like these, but that doesn't mean when they actually have to help the innocent general public, it won't have a huge impact on their mental health).

He was shot dead. Thank God!! Good riddance to pure evil!!

Taxpayers shouldn't pay for these heinous monsters to be put in a prison for a few years..

Anybody that is that intent and capable of hurting
many innocent lives, should not be on this earth.

abitoflight · 30/11/2019 13:08

Do we know any more about the lorry spanning the road?
Doesn't seem to be terror related.
I do wonder if the driver put lorry across the road to stop other vehicles ramming in to pedestrians?

VaggieMight · 30/11/2019 13:11

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at poster's request.

Devereux1 · 30/11/2019 13:24

Perhaps I missed a post, but @HoldNose, are you saying this man should not have been killed?

AnyMinuteNow · 30/11/2019 13:45

The convicted murderer (general) would have little compunction in attacking anyone. Those on prison convicted of violent offences are violent offenders. They are capable of violent assault and murder, many may be psychopaths, certainly not meritous of awards. Murderer just doing what murderers do, it comes easily to them, not bravery. Thriving in violence and aggression.

Holdnose doesnt seem to realise they are condemning the terrorist through their words here. That they are saying very clearly they are setting themselves against the terrorist [who planned to take life, who murdered and planned to murder].

Holdnose says they are against everything the terrorist did and anti their actions.

Presumably holdnose is in a place of not allowing themselves to consider such things as their reactions in any situation of threat. This is against human functioning/survival, that once aware that threats in life exist you prevent yourself from thinking about it, actively blocking. We take avoiding and defensive actions every day.

Presumably they would simply passively wait to be murdered by the murdering terrorist, either by bomb, gunshot or stabbing.

Whats this about the man who escaped the scene after stabbing two, originally from stoke?

abitoflight · 30/11/2019 13:56

Thank you Vaggie

Ginger1982 · 30/11/2019 14:04

@HoldNose can't answer the question. Says it all really.

CoolCarrie · 30/11/2019 14:06

I think the police and bystanders did exactly what was right, shot the bastard and saved lives, good luck to them. Terrorists don’t play by some rule book, they kill incriminatly , they are ruthless and act without any conscience., anyone who has any sympathy for the man who did this is deranged. Holdnose is clearly as arse or a troll. I just feel very sad for the people who were murdered and for their families and friends.

FlamingoAndJohn · 30/11/2019 14:13

I believe that people planning to commit acts like this will wear a fake bomb vest knowing they will get shot.
Being shot makes you a martyr, going to prison does not.

PreseaCombatir · 30/11/2019 14:24

I believe that people planning to commit acts like this will wear a fake bomb vest knowing they will get shot
There’s a term for this phenomenon- blue suicide.

Basically giving the police no choice but to shoot to kill.

As for the ‘hero’ it’s raised some philosophical questions, can a good deed offset a bad one, are people ‘good’ or bad, or do ‘bad’ people do ‘good’ things and vice versa. Etc.

However if I were the family of his victim I would feel heartbroken and him being labelled a hero. It must be gut wrenching for them.

egontoste · 30/11/2019 14:25

Being shot makes you a martyr, going to prison does not

They might think it does. But there's no reasoning with people like that.

Which is why anyone who poses a danger to society at large needs to be prevented from having the opportunity. It's about time our justice system woke up to the fact that, for some people, rehabilitation is never going to be an option.

AnyMinuteNow · 30/11/2019 14:56

The cult/religion references made by pp of the disenfranchised of the world being drawn inexorably by the cults and religions of the world have it.

There are also many of the most dangerous perpetrators of dv following similar lines of holier than thou and very imbedded in either their own beliefs or those of their community (and taken too far).

Extremism.

BovaryX · 30/11/2019 15:00

As I posted before, he was sentenced to 16 years in 2012. He was released in 2018. He was at a conference on ‘integrating’ ex convicts when he murdered two people. This terrorist attack will highlight the myriad failings in sentencing and parole because it happened at a conference on‘rehabilitation.’ The judge said this about his early release:
In my judgement, these offenders would remain, even after a lengthy term of imprisonment, of such significant risk that the public could not be adequately protected

AnyMinuteNow · 30/11/2019 15:12

I am s hocked he could possibly have been included in the cast of 'ex' offenders when hes still considered to be under her majestys glare and control, albeit in the community.

Heads of those in decision-making positions need to roll for this and all the other inadequate provisions and supposed rehabilitation that fails over and over.

Society knows that some hold dangerous beliefs that don't change from simply having served time.

These decision-makers are overpaid and under intelligent.

AnyMinuteNow · 30/11/2019 15:12

Who is at liberty to ignore a judge's ruling and counsel?

Delatron · 30/11/2019 15:28

It looks as though the attack started at the lecture and one of the men killed was a lecturer there. Surely there must be huge questions raised about security measures if he could attend such a lecture with knives and the hoax vest on him.

We get searched every time we go to a concert (rightly so). Weren’t these men searched? Surely there should have been more security if you have an event full of former prisoners. ..

AnyMinuteNow · 30/11/2019 15:32

Fucking appalling that a lecturer with years of education and experience to offer to help ex offenders with moving forward with their loves loses their life.

Flowers and Flowers to those who lost their lives and to those still suffering.

BovaryX · 30/11/2019 15:36

It was a conference designed to help released prisoners with their ‘rehabilitation.’ The outrage is that this terrorist fanatic was released at all. Let’s hope this causes a forensic examination of sentencing and parole. Especially in light of the judge’s comments

kateandme · 30/11/2019 15:42

ive been in bed sick.i know this is anooying but can aybody fill me in on what we do know.i think ive opened fifty trillion tabs all telling me very different (mostly looking like gossip) details!
this man was at a conference did he kill other offenders at the conference or random public.
ive seen that tthe other offendrs chased to stop him but also it was just people on the street
iv seen that the man running from the scene with the knife chcucked somthign out his poket into the water so is involved.
i cant find any detail that arent different with evry page i read