[quote Iamstuckhere]@SwanShaped… you asked why women don’t put their children first. Well sometimes they are…
If you leave, you won’t win in court at trying to prevent access to the abusive father. So do you stay and try and protect them. Or leave and hand them over to their toxic father half the time, unprotected. And I’m not just talking about physical abuse. Who do you think they turn their toxic emotional bullying onto?
Family law prohibits mothers from protecting their children from abusive fathers. Fact. Let that sink and and then ask your question again.[/quote]
I'm so sorry you've had this experience. It was a massive fear of mine that he'd end up with shared (or even full!) custody if I left. At least if I was with him, I could keep an eye on things.
The social workers (after removal) said this would never have been the case, but everything I've read of other people's experiences seem to say otherwise. So many of the women I met on my journey were having to deal with exactly that.
It comforts me in some way that I was probably right on that front, even though it meant we eventually both lost them. Long term, for me, it has worked out well as he will never be allowed them unsupervised. Or at least that's what I've been promised. Time will tell on that front.
It's definitely a part of the system that needs to be looked at and changed. I think many more woman would be able to leave without it getting as extreme as my case if they knew they would be fully supported and not expected to share custody with an abuser who at best case would use the kids as a way to continue the abuse, and at worst turn that abuse on the kids 