Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Work

Chat with other users about all things related to working life on our Work forum.

Update: Called to HR for behaviour at an after-work event.

128 replies

DrLoveHandles · 28/08/2026 11:54

Morning MNers. I wanted to say a massive thank you to people who replied to my panicked thread on Tuesday about being called to HR. And thank you to people who DMed me as well. It was such a big help to get some perspective and to know how to prepare. Thank you!

Here’s the original thread: Page 40 | Called to HR for behaviour at an after-work event. Thoughts, please... | Mumsnet

Right, an update:
I had the meeting with HR this morning. It was a fact-finding meeting. I took a colleague from another department who made copious notes.

Basically, a complaint has been lodged against the guy who asked me “Why aren’t you drinking?” because he made inappropriate and unprofessional comments to a junior female member of staff after I’d left the drinks reception last week.

In response, he’s lodged a counter-complaint to say that he was ostracised and bullied at the event by several women. I am one of the women he's named, saying that I spoke unprofessionally and condescendingly, citing a couple of Respect At Work type policies. He hasn't lodged complaints about individual women but, I think, about the event and event organisers itself saying that they/it created a non-inclusive and hostile atmosphere for men, partly perpetrated by the women who were mean to him. The event itself was about a "woman's issue" so, yes, it was mostly of interest to women.

HR wanted to hear my side of the story which I told them as recommended by several posters (thank you again!). I told them he asked me an intrusive and unprofessional question which could raise issues re. several protected characteristics. I told them that I tried giving “soft no” answer as a social cue to avoid social awkwardness or embarrassment (i.e. the thing he’s accusing me of), then moved to be firm and clear (as taught on the leadership course) before I left the conversation.

I said that if my experience is anything to go by, his perception of being “ostracised” or “bullied” is very likely to be women setting professional boundaries – there are a few policies that talk about this which I cited.

HR said that its very unlikely his complaint will go anywhere, but they have to hear everything that happened that evening and fully investigate. I’m just waiting to hear back about that.

They’re going to use what happened to me (him persistently asking why I’m not drinking) as evidence of a pattern of his behaviour that evening in support of the original complaint about him.

Page 40 | Called to HR for behaviour at an after-work event. Thoughts, please... | Mumsnet

Name changed because this is potentially outing. I was at an after-work reception last week. There was mingling. I mingled into a group of four col...

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/work/5570421-called-to-hr-for-behaviour-at-an-after-work-event-thoughts-please?page=40&reply=154361919

OP posts:
DrLoveHandles · 28/08/2026 20:01

SerafinasGoose · 28/08/2026 16:21

The other thread attracted exactly the same type of man OP encountered on this evening event, along with the usual women who pander to them with the 'be kind' schtick. They are a staple on this site and, unfortunately, in academia too.

I rarely ever socialise with colleagues at my home university, usually only at conferences involving my own research networks. My attitude is that if I don't absolutely have to be there, I won't go. There are other ways of being collegial - they get enough out of me with the well-over contractual hours I expend on teaching and research - and I'm not paid for optional extras like these.

This thread is a timely reminder as to why I consider 'head down, mouth shut' an effective workplace strategy. It hasn't always worked, particularly when coming up against men like this, but it's enabled me to avoid some unpleasant situations which later blew over without my presence and with the least possible amount of harm done.

OP, I hope you never have to encounter this presumptuous oaf again.

I don't socialise much with colleagues either for all kinds of reasons. But the group that organised last week's drinks reception host really good networking events so I decided to stick around for it. It only take one stupid colleague (usually a man, let's be honest) to ruin things.

OP posts:
DrLoveHandles · 28/08/2026 20:03

Firebox64 · 28/08/2026 16:57

What’s interesting to me is that you immediately thought you’d done something wrong and were in trouble. Male entitlement has us captured to the bone. You dared to stand up for yourself and at once began to anticipate and fear the consequences. I am sorry for the stress you suffered x

You're so right.

OP posts:
Dreamcatcherat50 · 28/08/2026 21:20

'Can’t believe some posters on the previous thread basically chastising you for having boundaries and not pandering to sexist ‘be kind’ shite.,

Yeah. I remember some of the language used by the posters making up stories about the OP being 'an arsehole' and seeing herself as having 'a strong sense of justice' etc etc etc.

Actually fantasising abiut her being hated by her colleagues and finally getting into trouble.

Hope they all feel stupid.

Justawalk · Yesterday 06:52

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

itsgettingweird · Yesterday 06:57

Well done!

Did laugh though at the premise of the meeting.

Woman complain about man’s behaviour.

Man complains he feels bullied by the woman. 🙄

DrLoveHandles · Yesterday 09:22

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Exactly.

Last year, there was a 7 month investigation into a male colleague who had four complaints of sexual misconduct against him. There were hundreds of pieces of evidence gathered, thousands of pages of reports and months of various people's time. There was a watertight case against him. HR ended up saying "No misconduct, just a misunderstanding, fault on both sides"

But I'm not about to give up my cushy, flexible, autonomous, very well paid job because HR (who I never interact with) are incompetent 🤔

OP posts:
Justawalk · Yesterday 09:46

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Justawalk · Yesterday 09:46

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Watdidusay · Yesterday 10:05

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Academia isn't corporate. You get a black spot on your name in academia, your whole career internationally is down the drain. Often they protect charismatic or well -connected people as they bring in funding and opportunities. Even if they're going around sexually harassing everyone.

Justawalk · Yesterday 10:18

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Watdidusay · Yesterday 10:38

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Yes sadly that's exactly what I mean

Justawalk · Yesterday 10:48

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Dreamcatcherat50 · Yesterday 10:52

Decrepit and incompetent HR and predators running riot in academia are things which definitely exist.

How is this a surprise to people?

Justawalk · Yesterday 10:54

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

DuckbilledSplatterPuff · Yesterday 10:56

Watdidusay · Yesterday 10:05

Academia isn't corporate. You get a black spot on your name in academia, your whole career internationally is down the drain. Often they protect charismatic or well -connected people as they bring in funding and opportunities. Even if they're going around sexually harassing everyone.

@DrLoveHandles if the above applied in your case. is it worth getting some legal advice and ensuring that your name is completely cleared on your work records and that you are allowed to contest any commentary that may end up on your records or have it removed entirely?

DrLoveHandles · Yesterday 11:32

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

The women appealed the original decision. They were assigned an "objective" colleague who'd done external HR sexual misconduct training to look over the case - a man whose day job was a catering manager. He sided with the HR conclusion and the women were told there was no right of appeal.

Two of the women left the university. The other two had been run ragged and their careers stalled by the whole process and didn't have the heart for more fighting. So they didn't go any further.

As PPs working in the sector might guess, the man in question was quietly moved to a very comfortable position- no technically a promotion but certainly a very, very nice new set of circumstances.

OP posts:
Dreamcatcherat50 · Yesterday 11:37

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Does anyone on this thread know anything?! Anything at all? I envy your sheltered lives.

Justawalk · Yesterday 11:40

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Justawalk · Yesterday 11:41

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Whynotecinusername · Yesterday 17:05

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Sometimessmiling · Yesterday 17:45

DrLoveHandles · 28/08/2026 12:00

I'm really relieved, thank you

Well done for being truthful and calm. Also for standing up to him in a professional manner at the night out

Cotopaxi · Yesterday 18:16

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

People who stick their heads above the parapet get shot. Same the world over.

Realworld10 · Yesterday 18:48

There you go! Overthinking and negative anticipation are what we as humans do because we're all so scared of saying or doing the wrong thing in today's dissection of everything. It's like you have to imagine a judge and jury scenario for anything you've said or done.

Gurgletummy · Yesterday 20:00

Do “cushy well paid” jobs in academia exist?

noodlebugz · Yesterday 20:24

Good! Hopefully you’re both relieved and satisfied OP.