Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Work

Chat with other users about all things related to working life on our Work forum.

Called to HR for behaviour at an after-work event. Thoughts, please...

797 replies

DrLoveHandles · Yesterday 14:17

Name changed because this is potentially outing.

I was at an after-work reception last week. There was mingling. I mingled into a group of four colleagues. All were holding wine. I was holding orange juice.

One of the colleagues - different department, never met him before - asked "Why aren't you drinking?"
I kind of waved my hand, said "Oh, you know, reasons" and laughed. I believe this made it clear I didn't want to discuss the matter without making things awkward.
The guy then said "Intriguing, like what reasons?"

I saw red. I basically listed all the reasons why someone mightn't be drinking alcohol and told him it was inappropriate to ask. I didn't shout or swear and I wasn't overtly aggressive. But my tone was patronising and I took a very forthright kind of stance (unblinking eye contact, standing at full height, no smiles etc.). I didn't give him time to reply, I excused myself from the group and went home shortly afterwards.

Today I got an email from my line manager asking me for a meeting with her and HR people to discuss what went on. Apparently, its a matter of unprofessional behaviour.

I'm not in a union.

I've never had any dealings with HR before. I'd be really grateful to hear anyone's thoughts on this situation. I mean anything - what might happen? What I should do to prepare etc?

OP posts:
ExpressCheckout · Yesterday 15:39

DrLoveHandles · Yesterday 15:24

Thank you! You're absolutely right.

My stance and tone were actually drilled into me at a coaching course I went on for female leaders. There we learnt about the importance of strong body language, eye contact etc.
So HR only have themselves to blame really 😅

Hmm, but I'm sure the course wouldn't have told you to be patronising.

To be honest, neither of you comes out well from this. He perhaps should have been less intrusive. You, on the other hand, were aggressive, and a patronising confrontational style might be seen as bullying behaviour.

Passive aggressive interventions have no place in leadership, and I'm saying this as a qualified and experienced professional coach. Just apologise, take this as a learning experience, and move on.

Grammarnut · Yesterday 15:39

DrLoveHandles · Yesterday 14:22

@Calasa I'm aware it doesn't matter that it was after work - I just wanted to add that to clarify why everyone was drinking 😂

I don't understand why you didn't give a reason. It's a conversation gambit - a bit heavy handed but that's all it is. Presumably it was either because you don't like alcohol, were driving or were going on somewhere and didn't want to drink alcohol beforehand or maybe you might be pregnant. The first three are acceptable answers to the question, the fourth you would, of course, keep to yourself.
Are you usually this touchy?

HouseBee · Yesterday 15:40

Calasa · Yesterday 14:21

I am an employment lawyer. The chances that this will be anything more than a verbal warning are relatively low. It's not about the question, it's about how you interacted with a colleague. It sounds like your tone and behaviour was potentially disproportionate and unnecessarily confrontational. The fact that it was after work is neither here nor there. It's connected to work.

I suspect you'll just be told to be mindful of interactions with colleagues and that everyone has to work together. I suspect he will be told that he should be careful about asking personal questions.

I’m not questioning whether you’re right or not on a legal pov. I’m pretty sure you are.

But I’m funding.
So someone comes and asks you a really inappropriate question and, as a woman, you’re supposed … to be meek, pleasant, not standing up but making yourself small as to not offend poor James who can’t cope to be put back to his place.

I am sure if the OP was a man
1- tge guy wouldn’t have made a comment
2- the guy wouldn’t have reported it
3- 3- and if he had, it would have been assumed to be assertive rather than confrontational/over the top.

musicforthesoul · Yesterday 15:40

I'd genuinely assume someone answering the initial question with "Oh, you know, reasons" was trying to be a bit mysterious and wanted to be asked again. It doesn't read as a polite brush off to me, in my circles anyone answering with "reasons" would both be expecting and want a follow up question.

I'm surprised this is with HR though, just sounds like a misunderstanding. Can't see it going anywhere more than a warning (probably for both of you, him about being careful with personal questions and you for seeing red and potentially overreacting).

bitontheobtuse · Yesterday 15:41

DrLoveHandles · Yesterday 15:24

Thank you! You're absolutely right.

My stance and tone were actually drilled into me at a coaching course I went on for female leaders. There we learnt about the importance of strong body language, eye contact etc.
So HR only have themselves to blame really 😅

HR will probably ask you what happened, so tell them from beginning to end in your own words. Also tell them that your stance and tone whilst dealing with his inappropriate behaviour were what you had learned on the assertiveness coaching course they sent you on for female leaders.

Also tell them that his comments were intrusive and completely out of order, and if it had happened during working hours, you would have reported him yourself. Could be worth mentioning that you are still considering that option.

There is of course a chance that you weren't reported to HR, but that another colleague reported him instead, and that's why they want to talk to you.

wacademia · Yesterday 15:43

topcat2014 · Yesterday 15:35

Charities are surprisingly toxic

Folding money says "academia", based on username and attitude of man.

Sodthesystem · Yesterday 15:43

I don’t think you’ve done anything wrong. Telling someone why you aren’t drinking when they keep asking can be as patronising as you like. It’s not in work, they can’t tone police you.

ChateauMargaux · Yesterday 15:44

I would definitely use your training to spin this...

I was confronted by this person, they refused to take no for an answer and I employed the techniques I was taught on the course, be firm, inform, advise of the correct approach in this situation and do no apologise.

It seems this person has taken offense to my manner of responding because it did not fot with his gendered expectations of my behaviour and when his methods of extracting compliance from me did not result in his desired outcome, he has resorted to calling out my behaviour so that I will comply in the future, perhaps he needs some training in professional communication and ingrained assumptions on gender behaviours.

Or.. well, I am surprised that someone reported X's behaviour, because it really was quite unprofessional but I thought my response was exactly in line with the training I received and while it did overshadow my evening resulting in my early departure, I didn't see that it was sufficiently serious to involve your department but maybe there are other things in play here of which I am unaware.

DrLoveHandles · Yesterday 15:44

wacademia · Yesterday 15:43

Folding money says "academia", based on username and attitude of man.

Correct. Rotten to the bloody core.

OP posts:
OliveMyLove · Yesterday 15:45

Anyahyacinth · Yesterday 15:34

It's a personal private question often related to health so was intrusive to ask. You explained why. Short unelaborate answers with HR always.

Perhaps he's problematic and someone has complained about him to ease him out. Be prepared for bizarre office politics and careful not to be used.

I agree with this.

What is his role?
Who else was there?
How much had he had to drink?

He pushed you for an answer to a private question and you provided it. It sounds like he was the one being unprofessional.

OliveMyLove · Yesterday 15:45

DrLoveHandles · Yesterday 15:44

Correct. Rotten to the bloody core.

MF. So old twat angry that a woman declined to play the correct role for him.

BinturongsSmellOfPopcorn · Yesterday 15:46

OneShyQuail · Yesterday 15:25

Whilst you probably could have explained better or responded differently, I agree it is totally frustrating when people pry as to why you arent drinking.
Not only is it totally insensitive to a female who may be pregnant and concealing, you are looked at like an alien sometimes. I usually reply with "i dont need alcohol to enjoy myself". That usually does it. In the last few years the market for non alcoholic drinks has improved massively too, so back to drinking a refreshing rekorderlig is just 👌

She doesn't need to "explain better". She doesn't need to explain at all. It's none of his business.

TheignT · Yesterday 15:47

musicforthesoul · Yesterday 15:40

I'd genuinely assume someone answering the initial question with "Oh, you know, reasons" was trying to be a bit mysterious and wanted to be asked again. It doesn't read as a polite brush off to me, in my circles anyone answering with "reasons" would both be expecting and want a follow up question.

I'm surprised this is with HR though, just sounds like a misunderstanding. Can't see it going anywhere more than a warning (probably for both of you, him about being careful with personal questions and you for seeing red and potentially overreacting).

Honestly when you've had nosey people pushing you for answers you really get fed up of it. Why would anyone need it want to know, does anyone ever push you for an answer about why you've chosen red wine instead of white or a lager instead of a coke? I bet they don't or if they do it's rare.

I have no idea why you think the OP would or should get a warning. He needs a warning and advice about appropriate behaviour.

fiorentina · Yesterday 15:47

I’d make detailed notes of the timings of the event, what you said as far as possible and take those with you.

As others have said its an inappropriate approach to challenge someone on not drinking and as long as you were factual and non aggressive just tell them what happened, keeping it calm in your meeting.

Perhaps your answer has led HR to be concerned for you and they also want to ensure alcohol isn’t an issue for you? From a duty of care perspective?

This is why many firms are now reducing staff events with alcohol as it does cause problems.

TheignT · Yesterday 15:47

BinturongsSmellOfPopcorn · Yesterday 15:46

She doesn't need to "explain better". She doesn't need to explain at all. It's none of his business.

Exactly this.

Howmanycatsistoomany · Yesterday 15:48

Grammarnut · Yesterday 15:39

I don't understand why you didn't give a reason. It's a conversation gambit - a bit heavy handed but that's all it is. Presumably it was either because you don't like alcohol, were driving or were going on somewhere and didn't want to drink alcohol beforehand or maybe you might be pregnant. The first three are acceptable answers to the question, the fourth you would, of course, keep to yourself.
Are you usually this touchy?

Edited

FFS OP shouldn't have to justify why she's not drinking alcohol. Her initial answer made it crystal clear it was not up for further discussion but the moron colleague moroned anyway and made OP uncomfortable enough that she left the reception.

GreenCaterpillarOnALeaf · Yesterday 15:48

He was annoyed you gave him a telling off and now he’s crying to HR? Weirdo.

wacademia · Yesterday 15:49

Grammarnut · Yesterday 15:39

I don't understand why you didn't give a reason. It's a conversation gambit - a bit heavy handed but that's all it is. Presumably it was either because you don't like alcohol, were driving or were going on somewhere and didn't want to drink alcohol beforehand or maybe you might be pregnant. The first three are acceptable answers to the question, the fourth you would, of course, keep to yourself.
Are you usually this touchy?

Edited

Or she might be a recovering alcoholic.

She shouldn't be put in a position where she has lie about being pregnant or in recovery. The end.

I was taught at Guides in my teens never to apologise for not drinking, never to explain it because an explanation is a form of apology if you think about it, and never to ask why someone isn't drinking.

usererror99 · Yesterday 15:50

being patronising to anyone is a thoroughly unpleasant overreaction - you could have said anything like “I don’t fancy it” or “I’m driving” but instead you wanted to be a bitch about it

itsgettingweird · Yesterday 15:50

LondonLass2026 · Yesterday 15:24

All my adult life I've been asked why I don't drink, and I'm so sick of it. Why are we such a nation of alcoholics?

I just tell people "because I don't like the taste" and that is the truth. I can't stand the taste of alcohol. I'd rather have a J20 or Schloer. If they carry on annoying me "oh you're missing out" etc, I just say "sure, OK" and move on.

It's a really boring and stupid question. No idea why your colleague was "intrigued". He must have nothing going on in his life. And to report you to HR? What a loser he is.

That one doesn’t work for me -
im usually drink alcohol free cider as I love the taste 😂

Papainspain · Yesterday 15:51

He was drinking alcohol, you weren't. Who's judgement and behaviour is likely to have been impaired? It may be worth presenting that question when meeting with HR. What a shame you were put in the position of having to be forthright. Are you accused of "being a bully"? Being forthright does not make that the case. Good luck.

Delphiniumandlupins · Yesterday 15:51

It might have been quicker just to say "I'm a pregnant, Muslim, recovering alcoholic on antibiotics and antidepressants" but it's done now. Assume that someone else has complained about his unprofessional behaviour and breeze into your meeting.

itsgettingweird · Yesterday 15:51

BinturongsSmellOfPopcorn · Yesterday 15:46

She doesn't need to "explain better". She doesn't need to explain at all. It's none of his business.

Spot on

👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

fashionqueen0123 · Yesterday 15:52

DrLoveHandles · Yesterday 14:38

@canklesmctacotits
If not, this is a man not getting what he wanted and expected from a woman, leaving him humiliated in front of other people. In which chase it should be him running to HR.

That sums up what I suspect has happened so well, thank you.

Make a formal complaint about him asking you personal questions and going to Hr when you didn’t give him an answer

Anyusernamewilldo8963 · Yesterday 15:53

Following simply to see the outcome of this as I can't believe it's even an issue that's been taken to HR and if there is any other outcome other than OP completely cleared and the dickhead man given a warning about inappropriate questions/behaviour then I'll be furious on your behalf OP.
I think you handled yourself perfectly, you attempted to politely dodge the inappropriate question and when pushed you stated the reasons why it was inappropriate, many of us if we are being honest would not be able to do this or handle it half as well and I'm sorry this happened to you but grateful for you posting as I now have the answer on how to deal with this the next time I'm in this situation instead of either answering with personal information i didn't want to give or mumbling something and feeling embarrassed and awkward when I really shouldn't as that's what the person asking should feel!