"You must get really angry when looking in the mirror, or is it that this is the wrong kind of sexism?
Neither. Your founding assumptions are flawed.
Are you also the sort of person that men must get in touch with their feelings and then get upset when they do, as have many posters on here?
No. I have no idea who these other posters are, nor why you brought them up, but your feelings about them are not relevant to me or to my argument. You do seem angry about them though, is that why you are projecting your anger at me?
As to Mansplaining, I did reply to you. Several times. Including a well reasoned post explaining the dynamic and, indeed, acknowledging that not only can both women and men be patronising without it being gendered but that in some circumstances the usual gender dynamic can operate the other way.
Your reply : "Thanks for "splaining" that to me, but like so many you are happy to hide your sexism behind gendered wording. By all means continue to be patronising and prentending that both sexes are not as guilty as each other for doing it."
So yes, I have indeed read your posts properly. And to give you fair treatment, I read them again. And what really stands out is that there's no actual argument from you here, just a flat dismissal and doubling down on your original unevidenced claim, followed by the last few petty digs.
You will, I'm afraid, have to do better.
Any time you want to engage with actual examples of sexism to put context and weight behind your empty assertions, I'm here.
Until then, I doubt I'll bother replying. Not because I'm scared, but because you simply aren't offering anything of substance to discuss and I'm bored now.
Have a nice evening.