Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Taskmaster: if you don’t use ‘correct’ pronouns you’re a philistine…

502 replies

Sugarleaf · 24/10/2026 22:47

…Who’s stuck in the past. To be ‘cool and curious’ you need to use non- biological sex based pronouns. And this is about a ‘certain generation.’ I mean I’m 32 and think it’s bollocks.

plus, as a bonus, ‘if you don’t like me, fine, as long as you use my correct pronouns.’

ffs

Taskmaster: if you don’t use ‘correct’ pronouns you’re a philistine…
OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
BackToLurk · Yesterday 10:14

sweetnsourr · Yesterday 10:05

The point you are missing is using them as a sign of acknowledgment of another's right to individuality isn't a belief statement or even agreement in those choices.

What you, or Chloe or whoever, is asking is that someone who doesn’t share your belief alters their behaviour to align with it. How far do you take that?

Pingponghavoc · Yesterday 10:14

Denim4ever · Yesterday 10:11

Nina sulks every time she doesn't win

And that information would be relevant in a thread about Nina.

Helleofabore · Yesterday 10:14

sweetnsourr · Yesterday 10:05

The point you are missing is using them as a sign of acknowledgment of another's right to individuality isn't a belief statement or even agreement in those choices.

“The point you are missing is using them as a sign of acknowledgment of another's right to individuality isn't a belief statement or even agreement in those choices.”

There is no way to untangle this contradiction. One person’s right to individuality doesn’t override another person’s right to choose whether they are going to act as if they support that belief that means a change of language from reflecting material reality to gender identity belief or not.

There is no way to avoid the logic that someone using the opposite sex language for someone is acting as if you believe that person has somehow changed sex in some way. Can you name another group of people who get to acquire the language terms used by others and make it then mean the opposite to what it was intended all based on their philosophical belief and have the power of societal expectation that this is acceptable?

sweetnsourr · Yesterday 10:15

Helleofabore · Yesterday 10:08

And yet your point is directly contradictory.

If there is an expectation of what ‘politeness’ is that seems to me to be the epitome of social pressure.

No its not contradictory because noone is pressuring you to believe something to perform a social convention as you are suggesting using pronouns does.

BillieWiper · Yesterday 10:15

Oh that's why they did those stupid adverts! Saying letters of the Greek alphabet as the pronouns/titles of the participants. (Like calling them by the Greek letter their name starts with) Then at the end they show her and say 'and a Chloe..'

sweetnsourr · Yesterday 10:17

BackToLurk · Yesterday 10:14

What you, or Chloe or whoever, is asking is that someone who doesn’t share your belief alters their behaviour to align with it. How far do you take that?

We routinely alter our behaviour when we perform social conventions we don't necessarily want to but do to maintain social cohesion. This is no different.

Helleofabore · Yesterday 10:18

sweetnsourr · Yesterday 10:15

No its not contradictory because noone is pressuring you to believe something to perform a social convention as you are suggesting using pronouns does.

Oh. Really.

So just being pressured to act as if you believe is acceptable to you ?

That a person acts as if they believe while not believing at all and this is to be expected and apparently this is not social pressure is a remarkably incoherent position.

Helleofabore · Yesterday 10:18

sweetnsourr · Yesterday 10:17

We routinely alter our behaviour when we perform social conventions we don't necessarily want to but do to maintain social cohesion. This is no different.

Please list some examples.

OldCrone · Yesterday 10:19

sweetnsourr · Yesterday 10:15

No its not contradictory because noone is pressuring you to believe something to perform a social convention as you are suggesting using pronouns does.

What social convention are you talking about?

As far as I know there is no social convention which suggests that I should refer to a woman who is pretending that she doesn't have a sex as 'they'.

sweetnsourr · Yesterday 10:21

Helleofabore · Yesterday 10:14

“The point you are missing is using them as a sign of acknowledgment of another's right to individuality isn't a belief statement or even agreement in those choices.”

There is no way to untangle this contradiction. One person’s right to individuality doesn’t override another person’s right to choose whether they are going to act as if they support that belief that means a change of language from reflecting material reality to gender identity belief or not.

There is no way to avoid the logic that someone using the opposite sex language for someone is acting as if you believe that person has somehow changed sex in some way. Can you name another group of people who get to acquire the language terms used by others and make it then mean the opposite to what it was intended all based on their philosophical belief and have the power of societal expectation that this is acceptable?

intended

We already did this with feminism remember? if you are going to lean on tradition you can't expect to call yourself a feminist & be taken seriously.

Words that have more than one meaning isn't anything new.

OldCrone · Yesterday 10:22

sweetnsourr · Yesterday 10:15

No its not contradictory because noone is pressuring you to believe something to perform a social convention as you are suggesting using pronouns does.

So we're not expected to believe she doesn't have a sex, but we're expected to do what? Pretend to believe it? Or lie?

AsiaFlyer · Yesterday 10:22

TransParentlyAnnoyed · Yesterday 00:05

Chloe's entirely correct. Learning which pronouns people use is very easy, and just basic respect. Same as learning to pronounce an unfamiliar name properly rather than just call someone what you want (something which used to be incredibly common, e.g. Martin Offiah's name was mispronounced for decades by TV pundits.)

Getting angry because someone's different to you, only announces your own limitations. The world's a beautiful, complex place and none of us know everything. So listen, learn, educate yourself.

I live in a country with unsexed pronouns.

But I don’t consider myself non-binary.

How do you suggest I make the stubborn natives start showing me some damned respect?

sweetnsourr · Yesterday 10:22

OldCrone · Yesterday 10:22

So we're not expected to believe she doesn't have a sex, but we're expected to do what? Pretend to believe it? Or lie?

For billionth time, sex & gender mean two different things.

Pingponghavoc · Yesterday 10:23

Nobody has a right to conceal their sex.

Chloe might be so misogynistic that she wants to distance herself from other women, but that doesn't mean she is allowed to blur the lines between men and women.

If chloe is allowed to pretend shes not a woman and shouldnt be addressed as such, any man can claim hes not a man and shouldnt be addressed as such. Anyone can see the safeguarding implications in this. Why is chloe reframing these issues as philistine?

FunPartyIdeas · Yesterday 10:23

Summeriscumin · Yesterday 08:00

I love that person on Taskmaster, even though I'm in my 70s. But the neutral pronoun is "it". "They" will always be plural to me. If they want a pronoun, and I quite understand that they do, then don't adopt one already in use. Make up a new one. Like I became Ms instead of Miss or Mrs.

Did you get any "kick-back" on your decision to be a Ms? I have nothing but respect for you and can imagine it would have been quite different back in the day?
I'm 46 and the comments I get at being a married Ms can be appalling! Not that I care!

BackToLurk · Yesterday 10:24

sweetnsourr · Yesterday 10:17

We routinely alter our behaviour when we perform social conventions we don't necessarily want to but do to maintain social cohesion. This is no different.

Not in direct contradiction of our own beliefs. Or should I have to eat meat if I go to the home of someone who ‘doesn’t believe in being vegan’?

OldCrone · Yesterday 10:24

sweetnsourr · Yesterday 10:21

intended

We already did this with feminism remember? if you are going to lean on tradition you can't expect to call yourself a feminist & be taken seriously.

Words that have more than one meaning isn't anything new.

Edited

How did feminism redefine the language to make words mean the opposite of what they did previously?

OldCrone · Yesterday 10:25

sweetnsourr · Yesterday 10:22

For billionth time, sex & gender mean two different things.

In English, personal pronouns refer to sex.

StealthTroublemaker · Yesterday 10:25

sweetnsourr · Yesterday 10:21

intended

We already did this with feminism remember? if you are going to lean on tradition you can't expect to call yourself a feminist & be taken seriously.

Words that have more than one meaning isn't anything new.

Edited

So ok. If woman means an adult human female and males that claim to be women, what is the word for an adult human female that would exclude these males and does not reference these males?

sweetnsourr · Yesterday 10:25

Helleofabore · Yesterday 10:18

Please list some examples.

Saying 'please', 'thank you', 'how are you?' 'you look great', 'your'e welcome' 'let me know if you need help' etc when you don't mean it.

FunPartyIdeas · Yesterday 10:26

sweetnsourr · Yesterday 10:21

intended

We already did this with feminism remember? if you are going to lean on tradition you can't expect to call yourself a feminist & be taken seriously.

Words that have more than one meaning isn't anything new.

Edited

What about SAHMs/tradwives? They lean on tradition? Can they be feminists?

sweetnsourr · Yesterday 10:26

OldCrone · Yesterday 10:25

In English, personal pronouns refer to sex.

Traditionally, but things have moved on somewhat since the 1960's.

NotBadConsidering · Yesterday 10:27

For billionth time, sex & gender mean two different things.

Oh, It’s you again, new name for last 48 hours I see.

StealthTroublemaker · Yesterday 10:27

sweetnsourr · Yesterday 10:26

Traditionally, but things have moved on somewhat since the 1960's.

Have they? According to whom?

sweetnsourr · Yesterday 10:27

FunPartyIdeas · Yesterday 10:26

What about SAHMs/tradwives? They lean on tradition? Can they be feminists?

If they aren't telling everyone else they must be trad house wives sure.

Swipe left for the next trending thread