Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Trans Women are Real Women and Should Have Access to Women's Spaces

1000 replies

user08101988 · Yesterday 12:32

Started because a thread on Girlguiding was getting too off topic.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
18
WearyAuldWumman · Yesterday 17:28

spannasaurus · Yesterday 17:24

Thats good then because "transwomen " can just go in the cubicle of the men's toilet, lock the door, do what they need to do, exit the cubicle and wash their hands

Edited

Yes. I'm sure that Katie/Lennon would have survived a visit to the gents' toilets.

https://www.thecourier.co.uk/fp/news/courts/4062580/dolatowski-deferred-sentence-polmont/

Sex offender Katie Dolatowski deferred sentence for assault behind bars

A sex offender who attracted public protest after being locked up in a Scottish all-women's prison has been dealt with for battering a male inmate during

https://www.thecourier.co.uk/fp/news/courts/4062580/dolatowski-deferred-sentence-polmont/

jasminocereusbritannicus · Yesterday 17:29

I am a woman.
I have no problem with people living their lives AS IF they are a woman...only don't tell me you ARE one when you are clearly not...that "offends" me that you think you are the same as me.
Be honest about it and I will accept you for who you are and how you live, but if you have male parts, including a prostate gland and an adam's apple , you are not a woman. The same goes for women who want to live as a man..if you have female parts , a uterus, ovaries,cervix and can become pregnant, you are not a man. Again, if that is how you choose to live your life, fine, but be honest about it.

SingleSexSpacesInSchools · Yesterday 17:29

£5 says we hit the post limit before the OP returns

Soontobe60 · Yesterday 17:29

user08101988 · Yesterday 12:50

I appreciate the question. I am a trans-fem non-binary person. This means, while I was AMAB, I mostly see myself aligned with femininity. However, I do not see myself within the binary of gender, so that's why I use those pronouns

Humans are not “assigned” a sex at birth. Our sex is determined at conception and recorded at birth in the vast majority of instances. Nowadays, a significant number of humans gave their sex determined well before birth. There is no “assigning” being done.
How exactly do you “assign yourself with femininity”? I’m female and don’t know what that even means.

Lightnomore · Yesterday 17:29

Also, if you think stripping down what women are to their body parts, that's what feminists fought against for years. Now women can get jobs, start bank accounts, own property, and so many more things. This is a very regressive view of what women are

No they didn't. Feminists rightly argued that our ' body parts' do not mean we shouldn't be able to own property, have bank accounts or have jobs that we are able to do. They did not argue that our 'body parts' don't mean we are women.

SodThisHeadache · Yesterday 17:30

I feel like I've been transported back to 2019. Booooooring

Sunnibee · Yesterday 17:30

ThreadGuardDog · Yesterday 17:26

It’s actually an insult. It implies a subset.

It's not an insult any more than "white" or "straight" is an insult .

GreyskySexRealistsky · Yesterday 17:30

🏆for the fastest filling thread OP!

It's almost like people really care about this stuff!

(however much we are told they don't)

ThreadGuardDog · Yesterday 17:31

Sunnibee · Yesterday 17:30

It's not an insult any more than "white" or "straight" is an insult .

Of course it’s an insult. The word ‘woman’ does not need a prefix.

Sunnibee · Yesterday 17:32

Ereshkigalangcleg · Yesterday 17:26

We don’t need that logic, because as you are very well aware, “trans women” are men in the piece of legislation which governs access to women only spaces, so they don’t actually have that access, however much you might want to ponder how many angels can dance on the edge of a pin.

"We don't need that logic"

what do you mean? That's the logic the pp was using to justify that policy.

BackToLurk · Yesterday 17:32

Sunnibee · Yesterday 17:07

My point was that people keep spouting statements like "the Supreme Court has confirmed that trans women are not women!" Which is completely misleading and incorrect:

To all intents and purposes a ruling on the Equality Act was all that was needed, as that’s the legislation that defines what is legal or not in relation to single-sex provision.

Sunnibee · Yesterday 17:32

ThreadGuardDog · Yesterday 17:31

Of course it’s an insult. The word ‘woman’ does not need a prefix.

What do you mean a prefix? If I say "white woman" is that an insulting prefix?

GreyskySexRealistsky · Yesterday 17:33

Sunnibee · Yesterday 17:30

It's not an insult any more than "white" or "straight" is an insult .

Of course it's an insult - we are not a subset of our own sex.
And we do not subscribe to this ideology so we do not use their terminology

AnnDroidAnnDroid · Yesterday 17:33

user08101988 · Yesterday 12:42

So, trans women are women. I have the evidence too. This is a study done by the NIH looking into the neuro-anatomy of 24 trans women pre-hormone therapy. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8955456/

There are also currently a total of 92 sex offenders who are trans women (this is 0.000135% of the population btw).

CNN did research into bathroom issues in the USA comparing states with inclusive laws vs. bans for trans women. They called various police departments and asked for crime data to do with trans people in the bathrooms that correspond with their perceived gender in both types of state. The conclusion showed that the inclusive law states had significantly lower instances of sexual assault in bathrooms as a whole. In the inclusive law states, many police departments reported 0 crimes.

We’re not in the USA.

Soontobe60 · Yesterday 17:33

user08101988 · Yesterday 12:53

They are biological females due to this study: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8955456/

Also, if you think stripping down what women are to their body parts, that's what feminists fought against for years. Now women can get jobs, start bank accounts, own property, and so many more things. This is a very regressive view of what women are.

Guess what else women can now do, with the full backing of the Supreme Court? We can tell men who claim to be women that they cannot enter their single sex spaces, take part in women’s single sex sports, invade women’s rape refuges, be placed on a women’s ward in hospital or, most importantly, us women can tell men who claim to be women that they’re just men.

Frequency · Yesterday 17:34

On the subject of CIS, why do trans women get to identify as their preferred gender identity, but when women want to identify as women, we are told we have to identify as something else?

I'm not a CIS woman. I am a woman. No prefix wanted or needed, thanks. I don't subscribe to gender bollocks and don't want to have it thrust upon me.

Sunnibee · Yesterday 17:34

GreyskySexRealistsky · Yesterday 17:33

Of course it's an insult - we are not a subset of our own sex.
And we do not subscribe to this ideology so we do not use their terminology

There are lots of subsets of women- white women, straight women, gay women, rich women, skinny women, British women.... etc.

Ereshkigalangcleg · Yesterday 17:34

Sunnibee · Yesterday 17:34

There are lots of subsets of women- white women, straight women, gay women, rich women, skinny women, British women.... etc.

The difference is that none of those women are actually men.

BackToLurk · Yesterday 17:34

Sunnibee · Yesterday 17:32

What do you mean a prefix? If I say "white woman" is that an insulting prefix?

White is an adjective not a prefix. HTH

GreyskySexRealistsky · Yesterday 17:35

Sunnibee · Yesterday 17:34

There are lots of subsets of women- white women, straight women, gay women, rich women, skinny women, British women.... etc.

Is this a joke?
Do you really not understand the difference?

murasaki · Yesterday 17:35

Sunnibee · Yesterday 17:34

There are lots of subsets of women- white women, straight women, gay women, rich women, skinny women, British women.... etc.

And none of them include unhappy men.

Tell me how a transwoman, no space, is a woman, please. You haven't so far.

SodThisHeadache · Yesterday 17:35

Sunnibee · Yesterday 17:34

There are lots of subsets of women- white women, straight women, gay women, rich women, skinny women, British women.... etc.

Yes, but not male women.

Soontobe60 · Yesterday 17:36

Sunnibee · Yesterday 16:11

I see I thought someone was saying it was evidence that there is such a thing as a "male brain range".

why are you assuming OP is male and weaponising pronoun use like that?

Because he is?

SingleSexSpacesInSchools · Yesterday 17:36

SodThisHeadache · Yesterday 17:35

Yes, but not male women.

One prize winging it's way to you for my favourite comment.

DarkForces · Yesterday 17:37

Sunnibee · Yesterday 17:34

There are lots of subsets of women- white women, straight women, gay women, rich women, skinny women, British women.... etc.

Women are not men. It's not complicated. Trans women are men.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.