Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Tempest v Rural Payments Agency Tribunal Thread 4

744 replies

myladydisdainisyetliving · Today 09:58

Previous thread: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5549122-tempest-v-rural-payments-agency-tribunal-thread-3

TT substack: https://tribunaltweets.substack.com/p/tempest-vs-defra-and-rural-payments

Tempest (a TW) is claiming discrimination, harassment and/or victimisation on grounds of gender reassignment. Central to the claim is the existence of the Sex Equality and Equity Network in the Civil Service (SEEN). SEEN has been granted right to intervene. Parts of the original claim against the co-chair of SEEN (Elspeth Duemmer-Wrigley) and another party (Andreas Mueller) were struck out or narrowed. Another claimant, PQ, is no longer part of the case.

I will also note that Elspeth still has a garden in need of seeds and water to support the ability of SEEN to be an intervenor in this case. The claim originated because she said "only women menstruate" and a search with her name and those terms at the usual gardening website should point you to her plot.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
16
WeareBeyondSupplementalBundles · Today 18:01

Hyenana · Today 17:58

So Cleo sounds a bit more likely to be the brains behind this case?
Is Cleo listed as a witness? I think I noticed the name only today in ED's examination by NC.

Cleo’s not stupid enough to give evidence in this mess.

Hyenana · Today 18:02

nicepotoftea · Today 17:41

If a colleague were to express their belief that "biological sex matters for both women and men in our everyday lives, including for our rights and needs in the workplace", would this create an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment for you?

75% Yes
17% I'm not sure
5% No
3% a combination of the three options.

Maybe it's just me, but doesn't this survey rather undermine their case? Are they not aware of things like maternity leave?

So the 167 respondents were all trans? Which vwould make ED the only intersex full member in this network that she thinks represents her situation and interests so well...
This sounds more and more as if she is more of a fig leaf than anything else.

Kirschcherries · Today 18:07

I can’t get over ED casually kicking Ritchie Herron out of AG after all he has been through. Surely if they allow allies e.g. partners, family members who are not TG or nor do they have a DSD they could show a little humanity.

myladydisdainisyetliving · Today 18:07

I think it's something when the claimant (and their witness) are making Beth Upton look comparatively reasonable.

OP posts:
murasaki · Today 18:08

BlueLegume · Today 17:46

Help me out here.
From ED today….
“ I have seen the working lives of so many lovely transgender, non-binary and intersex people overturned by the way some departments encourage and legitimise the manifestation of pretty much any gender-critical views’.

Let’s assume out of 532,000 Civil Servants there are 2660 identified as trans/nb which reflects the national statistic of trans making up 0.5% of the population.

I am retired now but at no time during a career spanning over 40 years did my personal life or sex life come into the office with me. Political opinions always neutral. My career started early 1980s. Political opinions were really divided at that time. But we came to work. We were productive and respectful- yes we were a mixed bag of personalities- and we embraced gay/lesbians who had just begun to win the well deserved equality. Poor language here but the gay men and lesbians I worked with at that time were often the most hard working people with unbelievable grit, resilience and integrity.

This just feels like everyone has to agree with the odd bods. Sorry if that is a childish phrase. It appears that none of these people could work in private/corporate industries. All that drives that for the most part is productivity and profit.

This is all becoming more ludicrous.

We need civil servants to do their job not bring their whole self to work.

Edited

That ED quote reminds me of Howl by Allen Ginsberg, 'I have seen the best minds of my generation destroyed by madness'

ProfLargofesse · Today 18:09

anyolddinosaur · Today 18:00

@ProfLargofesse Yes we'll have to agree to disagree - like adults. Whether the respondent was fair includes whether the claimant was batshit in the first place.

Any sane person would have decided by now that the claimant is acting like a toddler and would be a bit fed up that they have to spend a lot more listening to people essentially saying the same things over and over about that. A stupid idiot agreed their grievance when they shouldnt have done and this is what it's led to. As usual I'd like to see several of these people sacked but there seems precious little chance of that happening. At least ED has to do a proper job part of the time now.

The only interesting thing left is going to be how far the respondent's witnesses expose what idiots they were to go along with this.

Will the Tribunal be sane though?

‘Will the tribunal be sane though’ is a point on which we undoubtedly agree.

BlueLegume · Today 18:10

As I understand Land Registry is based in the North West. The NW employs more Civil Servants than many other areas outside of London. This includes Manchester and Blackpool - both very heavy on Pride and Progess.

The area Land Registry is based employs around 7200 staff in various hubs. All very close to Blackpool which is and has been for some time very Pride orientated. In fairness the Pink Pound rescued the area from demise during the 80s.

Is there a case that certain regional areas people who identify out of sex reality are able to get a safe job and with DEI being everywhere it is a good move to be anything other than a heterosexual man/woman who just wants to do a job and go home. I cannot assume anything but being ‘untouchable’ a word I have encountered from the mouths of 3 men I worked with - who on realising they might up for redundancy or challenged about a poor work ethic - suddenly identified as women. So we gained mediocre men with mediocre work ethics, presenting as women but still being mediocre. But as they all said ‘ we are untouchable’. And they were then able to make suggestions about how we all needed to be ‘educated’. It is so egotistical and so divisive. And I think they know this. But the lie is now so big everywhere is captured under ‘be kind’.

Londonmummy66 · Today 18:11

WeareBeyondSupplementalBundles · Today 18:00

Gurny Emma said in her WS oh Elspeth was so intimidating because she knew the LAW.

Except her co-chair was a lawyer leading teams of lawyers. 🤐

Oh ok then.

I did find the comments on Elspeth being soooo intimidating as she is a lawyer a bit of a joke when I saw what Cleo did. As a grade 7 (so a principal in old money) they presumably head a small team of lawyers advising tax inspectors etc so probably on quite tricky technical areas around company or trust or pensions law etc.

WeareBeyondSupplementalBundles · Today 18:12

So can we all have a conversation….

How the actually heck was Emma supposed to be supporting Tinkerbell’s case?

Which bit?

  1. Harassing the race group
  2. Banning books
  3. Cancelling the de-transitioners
  4. Suggesting anti-Zionism is a protected belief
  5. Saying females can talk to each other but not have groups
  6. Pushing for an investigation into Andreas and suggesting his guilt rather than addressing his conduct
  7. Being fawning and patronizing of Tinkerbell
  8. Calling the gender critical movement genocidal
  9. After being paid to do this full time being a best kept secret of the Civil Service but also ignored
  10. Issuing surveys of 167 trans / bi people, asking them leading questions and acting like it was accurate information for 450,000 civil servants.

I feel bad for angry Tink. With friends like Emma who needs enemies?

Tallisker · Today 18:15

Points to note. Emma Dunn does not work for Defra group. She works for a completely different area of the civil service with no overlap. However, she is chair of a cross-government network, so she can get involved with any civil servant who needs a network’s support.

Tinkerbell however said he didn’t know what her network does, and only knew her as a friend. Not true. In fact, an absolute WHOPPER of a lie.

Defra SEEN were not only not paid for running a staff network, they were only allowed to run it in non-working hours ie lunch break.

Emma Dunn said Ritchie Herron wasn’t eligible to be part of a:gender as he wasn’t trans. Emma Dunn is not trans.

a:gender is very well known throughout the civil service and are invited to input into probably every single staff policy. To say they are little know is another absolute whopper.

WeareBeyondSupplementalBundles · Today 18:15

Kirschcherries · Today 18:07

I can’t get over ED casually kicking Ritchie Herron out of AG after all he has been through. Surely if they allow allies e.g. partners, family members who are not TG or nor do they have a DSD they could show a little humanity.

The Stasi show no weakness. If a sliver of light gets in the darkness disappears. They cannot let the light in, not even a little.

Keeptoiletssafe · Today 18:16

MyrtleLion · Today 17:32

This is a screenshot of the results of the Gender Critical Survey Results of a:gender.

We surveyed our members to find out their views on three questions regarding the expression of ‘gender-critical’ beliefs in the workplace, and you can see the results here. We asked them if the expression of these views would cause them to experience harassment, defined by s.26 of the Equality Act 2010 as behaviour that would create an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment. The results reflect the views of 167 members, which might sound small, but if you wanted to conduct a survey of the general public that reached 167 trans people, you would have to survey 33,400 people!

You can download it here: https://www.agender.org.uk/resources/ because the image text is very blurry.

Edited

Their toilet worksheet is out of date, doesn’t align with Building Control, legislation, Approved Document T or British Standards, is economically unviable, discriminates against certain disabilities, the elderly, women, children and certain religions. It is not evidence based or proportionate in terms of health and safety. It misrepresents Approved Document M which discussed separate sex washrooms.

You can see where the ‘solution’ for more enclosed unisex toilets comes from. Making more provision unisex is not the answer.

viques · Today 18:17

MyrtleLion · Today 15:41

Here is our badge!

Does it come with a lanyard?

Hyenana · Today 18:17

ProfLargofesse · Today 17:56

Good point. ED thinks it likely. J seems to think that a mistake...?

I don't see how he can misunderstand what she is arguing, unless he only started reading her WS during the examination?

MyrtleLion · Today 18:17

How come ED can get time off to have been at the hearing every day? Surely she's only entitled to time off for the days she’s giving evidence?

TheatricalPaws · Today 18:18

WeareBeyondSupplementalBundles · Today 18:12

So can we all have a conversation….

How the actually heck was Emma supposed to be supporting Tinkerbell’s case?

Which bit?

  1. Harassing the race group
  2. Banning books
  3. Cancelling the de-transitioners
  4. Suggesting anti-Zionism is a protected belief
  5. Saying females can talk to each other but not have groups
  6. Pushing for an investigation into Andreas and suggesting his guilt rather than addressing his conduct
  7. Being fawning and patronizing of Tinkerbell
  8. Calling the gender critical movement genocidal
  9. After being paid to do this full time being a best kept secret of the Civil Service but also ignored
  10. Issuing surveys of 167 trans / bi people, asking them leading questions and acting like it was accurate information for 450,000 civil servants.

I feel bad for angry Tink. With friends like Emma who needs enemies?

I would suggest that the most important to ST was #7.

I think the rest was all Emma.

Kirschcherries · Today 18:22

BlueLegume · Today 18:10

As I understand Land Registry is based in the North West. The NW employs more Civil Servants than many other areas outside of London. This includes Manchester and Blackpool - both very heavy on Pride and Progess.

The area Land Registry is based employs around 7200 staff in various hubs. All very close to Blackpool which is and has been for some time very Pride orientated. In fairness the Pink Pound rescued the area from demise during the 80s.

Is there a case that certain regional areas people who identify out of sex reality are able to get a safe job and with DEI being everywhere it is a good move to be anything other than a heterosexual man/woman who just wants to do a job and go home. I cannot assume anything but being ‘untouchable’ a word I have encountered from the mouths of 3 men I worked with - who on realising they might up for redundancy or challenged about a poor work ethic - suddenly identified as women. So we gained mediocre men with mediocre work ethics, presenting as women but still being mediocre. But as they all said ‘ we are untouchable’. And they were then able to make suggestions about how we all needed to be ‘educated’. It is so egotistical and so divisive. And I think they know this. But the lie is now so big everywhere is captured under ‘be kind’.

Land Registry has offices across England and Wales, Swansea, Weymouth, Gloucester, Coventry, Leicester, Croydon as well as Birkenhead, Lytham, Durham etc.

Boiledbeetle · Today 18:23

WeareBeyondSupplementalBundles · Today 18:12

So can we all have a conversation….

How the actually heck was Emma supposed to be supporting Tinkerbell’s case?

Which bit?

  1. Harassing the race group
  2. Banning books
  3. Cancelling the de-transitioners
  4. Suggesting anti-Zionism is a protected belief
  5. Saying females can talk to each other but not have groups
  6. Pushing for an investigation into Andreas and suggesting his guilt rather than addressing his conduct
  7. Being fawning and patronizing of Tinkerbell
  8. Calling the gender critical movement genocidal
  9. After being paid to do this full time being a best kept secret of the Civil Service but also ignored
  10. Issuing surveys of 167 trans / bi people, asking them leading questions and acting like it was accurate information for 450,000 civil servants.

I feel bad for angry Tink. With friends like Emma who needs enemies?

God, it doesn't look good as a list does it!

Kirschcherries · Today 18:28

myladydisdainisyetliving · Today 16:02

From TT:

NC: You say that you and several other aG members when to the "spotlight on SEEN" event, but were not on camera and did not speak. You only went to gather things to complain about?
ED: No

NC: p2355 - starts 2354 (main).
NC: You take exception to a comment quoted in the post complaining about ppl plastering beliefs all over email sigs - notes civil service impartiality duty and says this breaches. You take exception?
ED: To article and the way written yes

NC: Would it be OK to have "pronouns sex based" in email sig?
ED: No bcs pronouns are not sex based they are gender

NC: So someone having "pronouns sex based" is plastering their beliefs, but having allyship and flags etc is not?
ED: I don't believe GC ppl are remotely affected by what we do and say

The final line
ED: I don't believe GC ppl are remotely affected by what we do and say

So Women who want SSS to be respected e.g. SP, Darlington Nurses, FWS etc. are not remotely affected by what ED and ST do and say. Wow.

anyolddinosaur · Today 18:31

Anti-Zionism was found to be a protected belief in the case referred to. Important to note that he was not anti-semitic and had a specific definition of Zionism. Also that they reduced his award because they didnt like his behaviour. So if the tribunal are stupid enough to find anything in Tinkerbell's favour they can reduce any award for his contributions to the issue.

Naomi has already shown agender were far from ignored.

PachacutisBadAuntie · Today 18:32

myladydisdainisyetliving · Today 16:11

From TT:

NC: Esp if minority or marginalised?
ED: Yes
NC: And trans ppl are?
ED: Yes
NC: Some people detransition?
ED: Tiny - 0.1% - GR surgery ppl v happy - knees 10%

NC: My point exactly - detransitioners are minority of minority?
ED: They are
NC: And partic vulnerable bcs major changes to their boides they regret?
[assume ED has nodded]

NC: p175 (int I think)
NC: email chain - read from the bottom. Your aG email to Ritchie Herron, a detransitioner - you tell him he must leave aGender.
ED: No, we asked him why he wanted to be member when not eligible, so we had to remove him bcs did consider self trans.

God, poor Ritchie 😥

Hyenana · Today 18:34

Hyenana · Today 12:39

So when ED was asked if there were other a:gender members at that event she says she does not know, but when questioned about the person who made the racism comparison, she knows exactly that they are a member of a:gender but that does not count because they are also a member of something else? 🤨

Just quoting myself here to add that in para 19e of her WS Emma wrote that "several" a:gender members, including top level, were at the event.
Is she actually trying to look as unreliable a witness as she possibly can?!

ProfDrLapwing · Today 18:36

Shortshriftandlethal · Today 15:40

NC: Such an extreme reaction to opinions they disagree with means ppl are not really suited to adult life? 😎😆

Sadly a bit long to get on a T shirt

poppsocks · Today 18:37

It seems odd to call a GI network 'a:gender' - they don't really include agender people, with their insistence that only gender identity dictates whether you're a man or a woman, and trying to get toilets etc for men/women on that basis (so agender people can't technically go anywhere)

Boiledbeetle · Today 18:39

ProfDrLapwing · Today 18:36

Sadly a bit long to get on a T shirt

You'd think that!

Tempest v Rural Payments Agency Tribunal Thread 4