To extend this beyond Emily’s Wikipedia history the Nazis had no objection to heterosexual cross dressing.
This is false.
"Queer Women, Gender-Nonconforming People, and Trans People
While the Nazis used Paragraph 175 to arrest and charge queer men, there was not a similar law that targeted other queer people. This does not mean that other queer people were not persecuted. The Nazis used several other laws and policies to target and punish people whose gender identity and sexuality did not conform with the party’s ideals. Paragraph 183, for example, was the German law against “causing a public disturbance with a lewd act.” The Nazis often arrested trans people under the law and argued that “cross dressing” caused a public disturbance. Fritz Kitzing was a gender nonconforming person who was arrested while in women’s clothing in 1933. The Nazis charged them under Paragraph Paragraph 361, the law against homelessness and begging. And as historian on trans woman Liddy Bacroff demonstrates, the Nazis did not recognize transgender identities as legitimate, and trans women were often arrested under Paragraph 175 as homosexual men."
"Some scholars have argued that because lesbians and transgender people were not targeted by specific laws and did not have their own separate prisoner category (and corresponding colored triangle), they were not really persecuted. This stance is dangerous because it relies on viewing this history through the Nazis’ own intentions and classification system to explain the experiences of the victims. The fact that lesbians and trans people were labeled as asocials rather than under their own separate category does not change that they were imprisoned and persecuted in concentration camps. The Nazi persecution of queer women and trans people was different from the Nazi persecution of queer men, but it was persecution nonetheless."
https://www.pinktrianglelegacies.org/learn/history
It's interesting that both the Nazis & GC feminists both considered trans people as gays.
On the wider issue I think the forces of Gender Ideology are already in retreat, so the analogy isn’t perfect, but successfully suing WPATH
Malpractice via breaching standards of care is a common problem throughout the medical profession so to assume this is some sort of 'take down' of WPATH is quite the leap.
(and both the massive leak of WPATH files and the recent court cases provide more than enough material) would be a decisive blow.
The WPATH Files have been thoroughly discredited.
https://www.erininthemorning.com/p/fact-check-216-instances-of-factual