Rupert Lowe’s rape gang enquiry, report published

[Yddraigoldragon]

The report has been published, link below.

http://bit.ly/4uE5odw

It is harrowing.

Have you no concerns for the victims who are receiving these letters?
The fact that there is a possibility of these animals being released, is an absolutely horrendous thing to behold.

Of course our thoughts are for the victims but it's just the Ministry of Justice sending out clumsily worded letters. They will be sending out tens of thousands of these letters informing victims of all sorts of crime about the changes so they can be prepared to object to release.

Fucking appalling.

So, at the ministry of justice (hahaha) there is no one that can put together a letter explaining to victims that the perpetrator’s of crime levelled against them might potentially be winning big by being released early in a way that isn’t ‘clumsy’? Why not? Are they all thick? Do you not think before sending the letters out the MoJ should have found someone external that does possess a braincell to cast an eye over the letters? Being that the victims are the most important people in it all?

This is what we should expect from the BBC. Impartial factual reporting. Much as Trump is detested he deserves his speech to be reported without manipulation.

The BBC also did it at a photoshoot in which Annie Leibovitz was photographing the Queen. This was a long time ago but they have history.

At the autumn launch, BBC1's channel controller, Peter Fincham, added: "Annie Leibovitz gets it slightly wrong and the Queen walks out in a huff."
The footage received wide coverage across the media today, appearing on the front pages of several newspapers, including the Sun, the Guardian and the Times.
However, it has emerged that the scene where the Queen was complaining to an aide was actually filmed on her way to the sitting

And it was quite obvious that the clumsy letters would find their way onto social media/into the media in general.

I can find almost no reporting on this anywhere in the media. Why is that?

Maybe before the by election it could be seen as not neutral for the BBC say to publish a report commissioned by Lowe. But they should be reporting on it now.

I also see that there was a motion about it in Parliament on 16th June that has so far only been signed by 4 MPs - Rupert Lowe himself, 2 Conservative MPs and 1 Independent MP.

The motion was That this House notes the publication of the independent Rape Gang Inquiry Report, established to examine the organised sexual exploitation of children across the United Kingdom; pays tribute to the survivors, whistleblowers, parents, campaigners and professionals who gave evidence; expresses profound concern at testimony detailing decades of rape, trafficking, violence, murder and abuse, alongside repeated failures by police forces, local authorities, social services, health bodies and successive Governments to protect vulnerable children; further notes the Inquiry's findings regarding the scale of organised child sexual exploitation and the institutional reluctance to confront its causes and characteristics; believes that many victims were failed not only by their abusers but by the very institutions charged with their protection; calls on His Majesty's Government to formally engage with the Inquiry's findings and recommendations, to provide a full written response to Parliament, to publish a timetable for action, and to set out which recommendations it intends to implement; and urges the Government to demonstrate that no consideration of political sensitivity, community relations, or fear of causing offence will ever again take precedence over the protection of children.

Yes, the msm just want to bury anything that puts ethnic minorities in a bad light. If it was the other way round, white British men abusing Muslim girls, the msm would be all over it. The BBC would never stop talking about it because it would suit their agenda.

It's crazy because it's not racist to highlight this issue. Some Muslims have called it out, although admittedly not many. The behaviour of the msm has meant people have lost faith in them.

But, but, but - the BBC never do anything wrong.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/6294472.stm

Ex Home secretary and born into a Pakistani family, Sajid Javid, received much criticism, when he called out the Pakistani Muslim grooming gangs.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-46684638

@oldtiredcyclist thanks for the link.

The footage had been supplied by production company RDF Media and the BBC had no idea it had been edited out of sequence, a joint statement from the BBC and RDF said.
"This assembly was never intended to be seen by the public or the press," the statement continued

Oh yes, sure. The article goes on to say:
The trailer was shown to journalists at a press launch of the BBC's autumn schedule.
How many people must have been involved in showing the trailer. If it wasn’t meant to be shown then that shows utter incompetence by whoever was in charge of the content.
Of course they deliberately showed it to make trouble. Just like the Trump Panorama.

Yes, it seems to be those on the right politically that have been better at calling it out. People like Reform's Zia Yusuf don't seem to have any of the squeamishness of those on the left when it comes to this issue.

Shows that it doesn't need to become a racist football if everyone is treated without fear or favour.

It shows that Zia needs to be racist to remain in post.