Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Do you feel that gender identity exists and is innate?

797 replies

FairHippopotama · 07/04/2026 20:21

In progressive circles, there's the concept of 'gender identity' where everyone has a gender (not necessarily corresponding to their sex) that is unchangeable and inherent to them as a person. Do you agree with this? Why or why not?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
FairHippopotama · 09/04/2026 12:40

Ereshkigalangcleg · 09/04/2026 12:12

I’m sure that must be nonsense, as OP says it’s all been proven that gender affirming treatment is the best thing to do. And obvs he knows best.

I didn't say that transitioning was the best treatment in all cases. I think many people who identify as trans at the moment would be better served with therapy because their gender dysphoria comes from societal pressures and mental conditions rather than neurological gender dysphoria in and of itself.

OP posts:
FairHippopotama · 09/04/2026 12:42

RedToothBrush · 09/04/2026 12:17

There is no middle ground.

You can't change sex.

Suggesting you can and that people who say it's impossible are somehow extreme and there's a middle ground between reality and fantasy is fallacy bullshit.

The gender-affirming movement doesn't claim you can change sex. They claim that gender is different and you can change sex. That's why the term used is 'transgender' and no longer 'transsexual'.

OP posts:
MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 09/04/2026 12:42

FairHippopotama · 09/04/2026 12:26

As far as I understand, feminists coined gender decades ago to refer to the expectations, norms, and roles associated with either sex. Gender is essentially a bunch of stereotypes. That's why many people are gender abolitionist, recognising that you don't have to be masculine to be a man nor feminine to be a woman.

The debate lies in what does being a man or woman actually mean if they are genders and genders are defined by these stereotypes? Gender-critical people, at least as represented by others on this post, seem to advocate for men and women being defined by their sex. Gender-affirming people would presumably say that men and women are those who identify as such, who are associated by society with the stereotypes around one sex or the other.

So gender = stereotypes?

In that case, I don't really understand why there is any debate at all. Being a man or woman is very clearly a matter of sex, not stereotype.

Gender-affirming people would presumably say that men and women are those who identify as such, who are associated by society with the stereotypes around one sex or the other.

There are two parts to this argument. Firstly, the notion that men and women are simply those who identify as such. I find this to be a very weak argument. I can't just decide that I identify as a cat or a dinosaur or an astronaut and therefore make that reality. "Identifying as" something doesn't really have any meaning, other than "wanting to play make-believe" about something.

The second part of your argument is that men and women are those who are associated by society with the stereotypes around one sex or another. But I don't think "society" considers people to be men or women simply because they adopt some of the stereotypes traditionally associated with the one sex or another. If you introduce a young child to a man dressed in women's clothes, they won't think it is a woman, they will likely ask why that man is dressed as a woman. If a woman chooses to have short hair and play football, society will typically see her as a woman who has short hair and likes football.

Yes, it is true that in recent times, society has forced many people to go along with the pretence of calling people men or women even when we all instinctively know that they are not, primarily because of the exhortation to "be kind". But most of us do actually know that trans people are not what they are claiming to be, as is often demonstrated by the accidental misgendering that is often committed by even the most loyal of trans advocates - occasionally, people forget, and their instinctive recognition of the biological reality of sex cuts through.

spannasaurus · 09/04/2026 12:44

FairHippopotama · 09/04/2026 12:42

The gender-affirming movement doesn't claim you can change sex. They claim that gender is different and you can change sex. That's why the term used is 'transgender' and no longer 'transsexual'.

Many do claim that they have changed sex.

FairHippopotama · 09/04/2026 12:44

Justme56 · 09/04/2026 12:28

The fact is that we seem to have a position where anyone can call themselves trans for whatever reason they want. No evidence, no proof just say it and everyone is supposed to accept it. You can’t say well this person has ‘genuine dysphoria’ and this person doesn’t. It’s quite obvious for at least some of these men it’s sexual and no matter how much people want to deny it, they must think women are stupid for not noticing. I am going to be honest, in these cases it feels like a complete mockery of women.

I agree. I think there should less immediate validation by medical professionals and more questioning to see if there's not a deeper reason (like sexual interests, AGP as you imply).

OP posts:
Usernamenotfound1 · 09/04/2026 12:45

FairHippopotama · 09/04/2026 12:32

You might be right for some people who claim to be trans, but not all. Although some others here seem to disagree (as I have briefly noticed...), it really is medically proven that a very small proportion of humans experience some sort of mismatch that makes them hate their own body because of their sex and the expectations upon them due to their sex (gender dysphoria), and that the best treatment for this is transitioning.

Why does this only apply to sex though?

what if a black person hates their skin, doesn’t identify with the expectations of black culture, and thinks they should have been born white…

we don’t think they have a “mismatch” and bleach their skin.

we don’t think people with eating disorders have a “mismatch” when they hate their bodies and give “weight affirming care” , liposuction and wld.

they get therapy and treatment is aimed at teaching them to accept their bodies. Not medically changing them into what they think they should be.

no one is “born in the wrong body”.

FairHippopotama · 09/04/2026 12:45

SilenceInside · 09/04/2026 12:33

"Gender-critical people, at least as represented by others on this post, seem to advocate for men and women being defined by their sex."

What do you mean @FairHippopotama by "men and women being defined by their sex"? Do you mean the words man/woman being defined as an adult human of either sex? Which is what I would agree with. Or do you mean that people are defined by their sex, as in it's their identity and defines them as a person with behaviours, attitudes etc?

I meant the first one; sorry for not being clear

OP posts:
Ereshkigalangcleg · 09/04/2026 12:46

FairHippopotama · 09/04/2026 12:40

I didn't say that transitioning was the best treatment in all cases. I think many people who identify as trans at the moment would be better served with therapy because their gender dysphoria comes from societal pressures and mental conditions rather than neurological gender dysphoria in and of itself.

Have you got that citation of the “medical proof” you claimed existed? Sorry to pester.

SilenceInside · 09/04/2026 12:46

There is no definitive proof of there being a subset of people who have some kind of robustly diagnosable “neurological” gender dysphoria. Let’s say there was, and it could be consistently discerned by brain scans, then this is still irrelevant as those people still aren’t the opposite sex because of their brain issue. They simply believe they are because of their brain issue. Clearly they should be treated and managed but that doesn’t mean that we need to agree they are the opposite sex and be required to treat them as such.

Separately, there is another question about whether medical transition is an effective treatment or the only possible treatment to alleviate distress caused by that brain condition. Personally, I don’t have an issue with adults taking decisions they feel are best for their physical and mental health, assuming they have good quality information to make that choice. I don’t think that exists in this case. I also don’t think that anything about medical transition means that the person has changed sex and must be treated as the opposite sex.

RunningforSam · 09/04/2026 12:46

FairHippopotama · 09/04/2026 12:34

People who identify as trans would say the exact same thing if you referred to them as 'identifting as trans' rather than simply 'trans'. They would also say it if you called them men or women based on their sex. You are upholding a double standard.

Cis gender when used for a person who doesn’t have a gender identity incorrectly categorises them.

’Trans people’ are those who fit into the category of people whose gender identity doesn’t align with their sex. Whilst ‘identifying as trans’ may not be a preferred term/ label, it isn’t misclassifying.

This whole debate comes down to categories and inclusion and exclusion criteria and unless we use precise, clear and accessible language, we end up talking (or arguing) at cross purposes

Wearenotborg · 09/04/2026 12:47

FairHippopotama · 09/04/2026 11:22

These stereotypes may be sexist and outdated, but they still exist. Many women still adhere to them, especially in terms of external appearance. It's not about males who 'feel' as if they are female but males with intense hatred of the fact that they are male, and a belief that they should have been born female, with all the social challanges and expectations that come from that. A 'frame of reference' isn't really needed at this point; it's a neurological thing.

In order to try to 'pass' as being born female, they associate themselves with these expectations, roles, and norms. That's when they might use gendered stereotyoes as a frame of reference, but as I said above, they are still largely adhered to in many ways: you don't see many tradeswomen, you don't see men in dresses, women are still expected to be kind and verbal, men are still expected to be boisterous and physical.

You don’t see many “tradeswomen”. Really? Maybe not in your neck of the woods but we have lots here. I know quite a few women in construction trades.

maybe you should join the feminists smashing gender rather than defending people. Who claim those outdated norms mean they are the opposite sex

cindervative right: only women can wear dresses
genderists : if you wear a dress you're a woman
feminists: anyone wear a dress

do you see the difference?

FairHippopotama · 09/04/2026 12:48

Ereshkigalangcleg · 09/04/2026 12:34

Yes, plenty of us here disagree. Let’s see your evidence of this irrefutable medical proof.

The standards of the Western medical world would seem to suggest this to be the case. Even in the 90s, before the gender-affirming movement was like this, gender dysphoria was recognised.

OP posts:
fantom · 09/04/2026 12:48

Yes, I'd say that gender identity exists, whether that's in the form of cultural stereotypes or deeper cross cultural archetypes of masculine/ feminine. I think there's a difference between male and female that goes beyond biology. I'm not sure whether it's innate or has come about via external influences or is a combination of both.

Wearenotborg · 09/04/2026 12:49

FairHippopotama · 09/04/2026 12:42

The gender-affirming movement doesn't claim you can change sex. They claim that gender is different and you can change sex. That's why the term used is 'transgender' and no longer 'transsexual'.

Err…. Yes, yes it does my sweet summer child. In fact, some people believe taking hormones a make a man grow a cervix. Stick around. It’s a wild ride 😂😂😂😂

Ereshkigalangcleg · 09/04/2026 12:49

Link the “proof”, please. It shouldn’t be too difficult, surely, you seemed very sure it existed.

FairHippopotama · 09/04/2026 12:50

Ereshkigalangcleg · 09/04/2026 12:39

As I said, you are imposing your own fringe worldview on women who reject it. Most of us do not accept that there is such thing as “cisgender” and we do not wish to be labelled as such.

“People who identify as trans” are not the people you are trying to discuss this with here, and your repeated snd unrepentant use of a term women find insulting, as a man on the feminist board of a female majority site, is very revealing.

Revealing of what? I'm not sexist just because I disagree with you. I didn't even know this was a specifically feminist subforum; I was just looking for the place on Mumsnet where gender etc. is discussed.

OP posts:
Ereshkigalangcleg · 09/04/2026 12:50

Did you not look at the title of the board?

Wearenotborg · 09/04/2026 12:55

FairHippopotama · 09/04/2026 12:50

Revealing of what? I'm not sexist just because I disagree with you. I didn't even know this was a specifically feminist subforum; I was just looking for the place on Mumsnet where gender etc. is discussed.

Errr…. How could you not know? It’s called feminism and women’s rights. The clue is in the title so did you just click on a random talk topic or are you telling a little porkie pie there….

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 09/04/2026 12:58

FairHippopotama · 09/04/2026 12:48

The standards of the Western medical world would seem to suggest this to be the case. Even in the 90s, before the gender-affirming movement was like this, gender dysphoria was recognised.

I do believe that gender dysphoria is a thing. But from my perspective, it is a mental health problem that needs to be treated as such.

As I said above, anorexics often believe that they are too fat. We don't treat them effectively by affirming that they are fat.

And if people are delusional, I believe that the advice is to validate their emotions without actually colluding in the delusion or pretending that you think it's true.

Why should we treat this particular mental health problem differently?

FairHippopotama · 09/04/2026 12:58

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 09/04/2026 12:42

So gender = stereotypes?

In that case, I don't really understand why there is any debate at all. Being a man or woman is very clearly a matter of sex, not stereotype.

Gender-affirming people would presumably say that men and women are those who identify as such, who are associated by society with the stereotypes around one sex or the other.

There are two parts to this argument. Firstly, the notion that men and women are simply those who identify as such. I find this to be a very weak argument. I can't just decide that I identify as a cat or a dinosaur or an astronaut and therefore make that reality. "Identifying as" something doesn't really have any meaning, other than "wanting to play make-believe" about something.

The second part of your argument is that men and women are those who are associated by society with the stereotypes around one sex or another. But I don't think "society" considers people to be men or women simply because they adopt some of the stereotypes traditionally associated with the one sex or another. If you introduce a young child to a man dressed in women's clothes, they won't think it is a woman, they will likely ask why that man is dressed as a woman. If a woman chooses to have short hair and play football, society will typically see her as a woman who has short hair and likes football.

Yes, it is true that in recent times, society has forced many people to go along with the pretence of calling people men or women even when we all instinctively know that they are not, primarily because of the exhortation to "be kind". But most of us do actually know that trans people are not what they are claiming to be, as is often demonstrated by the accidental misgendering that is often committed by even the most loyal of trans advocates - occasionally, people forget, and their instinctive recognition of the biological reality of sex cuts through.

Edited

You raise good points.

I disagree though; stereotypes, norms, expectations etc. are the basis for determining someone's gender. Someone short with long, cared-for hair, breasts, a thin waist, and large hips is going to be seen as a woman much more than as a man. You might say you can always tell their sex; this is only because the face is very revealing about your sex. It's likely you've confused someone's gender from behind before though. If you read of someone with a strong interest in military history and who sounds emotionally detached, you are much more likely to assume that person is a man than someone who describes their fervent environmental activism based on their love and respect for all living things. This is because various elements of either person are gendered - they fall into certain gender stereotypes.

The aim of people who identify as trans is typically to 'pass' as the opposite sex; they use gender to do that.

OP posts:
Wearenotborg · 09/04/2026 13:00

FairHippopotama · 09/04/2026 12:58

You raise good points.

I disagree though; stereotypes, norms, expectations etc. are the basis for determining someone's gender. Someone short with long, cared-for hair, breasts, a thin waist, and large hips is going to be seen as a woman much more than as a man. You might say you can always tell their sex; this is only because the face is very revealing about your sex. It's likely you've confused someone's gender from behind before though. If you read of someone with a strong interest in military history and who sounds emotionally detached, you are much more likely to assume that person is a man than someone who describes their fervent environmental activism based on their love and respect for all living things. This is because various elements of either person are gendered - they fall into certain gender stereotypes.

The aim of people who identify as trans is typically to 'pass' as the opposite sex; they use gender to do that.

Well. You assume those things if you’re a sexist, misogynistic idiot. I also know quite a few women into military history. Usually because they served in the military. You seem very sexist for one so young. I blame the parents.

FairHippopotama · 09/04/2026 13:01

Wearenotborg · 09/04/2026 12:55

Errr…. How could you not know? It’s called feminism and women’s rights. The clue is in the title so did you just click on a random talk topic or are you telling a little porkie pie there….

[ignore]

OP posts:
FairHippopotama · 09/04/2026 13:01

Wearenotborg · 09/04/2026 12:55

Errr…. How could you not know? It’s called feminism and women’s rights. The clue is in the title so did you just click on a random talk topic or are you telling a little porkie pie there….

[ignore]

OP posts:
FairHippopotama · 09/04/2026 13:01

Wearenotborg · 09/04/2026 12:55

Errr…. How could you not know? It’s called feminism and women’s rights. The clue is in the title so did you just click on a random talk topic or are you telling a little porkie pie there….

Something for discussions related to feminism is different to something for feminists. I thought it was the first; I was told it was the latter; which is it?

OP posts:
RedToothBrush · 09/04/2026 13:01

Ereshkigalangcleg · 09/04/2026 12:39

As I said, you are imposing your own fringe worldview on women who reject it. Most of us do not accept that there is such thing as “cisgender” and we do not wish to be labelled as such.

“People who identify as trans” are not the people you are trying to discuss this with here, and your repeated snd unrepentant use of a term women find insulting, as a man on the feminist board of a female majority site, is very revealing.

Quite.

It's a religious type belief at best.

We can not legislate for it without creating a situation where reality of sex becomes heretical. We can not pick and choose who is legitimately trans and who is making it up either.

Suggesting in anyway that observing sex is somehow extremist is dishonest because the very notion of trans rests on the recognition of sex. Trans rights and protection in law rest on the recognition of sex.

Transmen effectively have some of the most to lose by a failure to get their head out their arses and rely on whether they pass or not.