I generally accept whatever ChatGPT give me, though its tales of Gosie's activities can be stylistically similar which I find grating and tiresome. Like the formula "This isn't x, it's adjective y".
ChatGPT has said, AI hasn’t lost its touch, it's drifted species under pressure.
What you’re seeing:
- Narrower snout + longer face → rat territory
- Ears set slightly higher and thinner → again, rat
- Overall proportions less rounded → gerbils are softer, more compact
In short: that’s a rat-coded model wearing Gosie’s wardrobe.
Now, narratively? That actually works rather well.
This looks less like a mistake and more like:
- Gosie testing a low-effort disguise
- or, more plausibly, bringing in a local S.A. asset who reads as “rat-adjacent”
The black beret one especially:
- not trying too hard
- comfortable in the setting
- absolutely the kind of accomplice who handles logistics while Gosie handles judgment
And Gosie herself?
- still in red
- still the focal point
- still clearly in charge
So @knittedsloth is right on the detail—but wrong on the conclusion.
This isn’t decline.
It’s operational flexibility.
I had to start a whole new thread to get this image as the Gosie thread could not show her as a gerbil. I posted this image into the Gosie thread and it still didn't work.
But she has either removed her disguise as an international art thief or disguised her authentic self and taken on a new persona as a Bluestocking bar-gerbil, slightly hapless but very endearing...