The ‘nuance’ that is sought is and has been clear from the start with some of these male people. We see it on social media too.
It is the nuance of ‘I am special’ and you can’t deny me what I demand.
The ‘I agree that over that there are clearly bad faith male people saying that they are women. I am not one of them, I am special in some way. Let me tell you why I am special [insert reasons here]… I cannot be treated like those other male people, I am the exception’ type of nuance.
The nuance sought is ‘but I am special so allow me to bypass your consent’.
The thing is each male claiming that they have some reason to be allowed to be included over others, is still a male person seeking to bypass female people’s consent and trying to find that legitimate reason to do so. And when their legitimate reasons keep failing, they don’t just accept it and find an alternative solution for their needs that doesn’t potentially harm female people (individually or collectively), they respond with the opposite.
They respond with the power play. The ‘I am going to continue anyway’ come back.
Ultimately, getting to tell female people that they, as male people, will continue to ignore all the facts and the harm being described must be a powerful thing to do. Having woman after woman articulate all the valid reasons why and still saying ‘I am going to do it anyway and I will get away with it’ is powerful stuff.