Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

GLP are suing Virgin Active

234 replies

ByGreatGreenWriter · 15/01/2026 19:18

https://goodlawproject.org/were-suing-virgin-active-over-their-transphobic-rules/

“So we’re taking legal action. We are representing two claimants who are members of Virgin Active gyms and who have been subject to discrimination solely because they are trans.

According to Virgin’s new policy, both of them can no longer use facilities like the pool and sauna because they can only be reached by going through either the men’s or women’s changing rooms.“

If true that sounds like discrimination?

OP posts:
Hedgehogforshort · 17/01/2026 19:37

womendeserveequalhumanrights · 17/01/2026 17:55

I also note that the GLP argues that 'non binary trans man' QX should not be in the women's room as they are such an apparently manly manwoman they would make women uncomfortable, yet transwoman SP (who is an actual man that people have clocked) needs to change with women so he won't be uncomfortable and to hell with women.

Well said. The women's feelings and human rights only matter when they can be used in the service of men's wants.

Such transparent TRAliban anti-woman lack of logic. The manly TIF doesn't have 162% punch power of the other women, whereas the TIM does. I know who I'd rather get changed alongside.

This is my very favourite bit of nonsense in the application which surely would be blazingly obvious to a senior judge.

On the one hand he seems to be arguing that a pretend man QX (a woman for clarity) would be intimidating for women in a women only space whereas as actual man dressed as woman would not????

And then that a man pretending to be a woman, needs to be in a woman’s space as it is not safe to be in a male space, but a woman pretending to be a man in a mans space would be fine.

🙄

OpheliaWitchoftheWoods · 17/01/2026 21:26

womendeserveequalhumanrights · 17/01/2026 17:58

Maybe it's not as much fun when it's trying to use other men with the same level of punch power as you as unconsenting participants in your fetish.

I'm thinking staring at someone and saying 'when are you getting changed' or exposing your genitals 'accidentally' might not receive the same response in the men's as in the women's. Just guessing.

Edited

Absolutely that. As someone astutely commented yesterday, feeling vulnerable with other men, but powerful over women.

I've always thought beta male issues played a part in all this among everything else.

Arran2024 · 17/01/2026 21:32

Men apparently absolutely understand where they stand in the pecking order with a groupnof men and behave accordingly. When a man kills his partner, his male friends and colleagues, neighbours etc are shocked, because he was usually totally appropriate around them.

This doesn't apply to a man and a group of women. In most cases, he will try to dominate. He doesn't seek out his place in the female hierarchy, other than at the top.

Many men, with no skin in the game, think that trans women are fine to go into the ladies because, to them, they are low status and no threat. They don't understand that they are not a non threat to women.

Thelnebriati · 17/01/2026 21:39

I think they do understand how women feel, but the effect on women isn't their priority. They don't want to associate with men they perceive as low status, and they don't want to challenge other men who are making demands.

Hedgehogforshort · 17/01/2026 21:49

I would like to report that after a long learning journey on here and elsewhere, worrying about departing from my broader political values, and worrying about all manner of small issues I realised that i want to be hard line on this issue.

goodbye to the concept of trans goodbye to being kind hello ordinary words hello ordinary meanings.

What a bloody emotional and intellectual liberation.

UtopiaPlanitia · 17/01/2026 22:31

NotBadConsidering · 16/01/2026 06:59

I can’t imagine Jolyon being successful in honing anything other than than GLP’s bank accounts. If he spent time on here arguing his point he might realise why he keeps losing, but I imagine his ego would think he was still winning the debate.

It’s interesting, how some of the prominent legal voices seem so rubbish at winning cases or making coherent arguments. Strangio, RMW, Maugham…are they bad lawyers/solicitors barristers or is the material they have to work with just so poor, and they’re happy to look like losers?

They're rubbish at making their arguments because not only are they arguing against rational & settled law, they're arguing against evolution and reality.

They need to stop tilting at windmills.

MyAmpleSheep · 17/01/2026 22:55

Grammarnut · 16/01/2026 08:16

Unless you are a woman - but only if your TiF looks do not cause alarm - the SC covered this one and said that such TiF cannot use female facilities. But presume if they pass that well they will be fine going through the mens? And would want to?

the SC covered this one and said that such TiF cannot use female facilities

What the SC said was more nuanced. It pointed out that if a TiF appears to be so masculine that admitting them would spoil the service being offered it would not be unlawfully discriminatory to exclude them. It didn't say that they must not or cannot be allowed to use any female facility. It very much depends on the service being offered and is at the discretion of the service provider.

What I took from that is that a very masculine looking man could reasonably be excluded from a female-only rape counselling session, but not, for example, a female toilet.

Hedgehogforshort · 17/01/2026 23:05

I had a career in women’s services and cannot imagine refusing a service to a woman thinking they are a man, unless they were so convincing i thought they were an actual man.

Which i believe would be unlikely

71Alex · 22/01/2026 07:42

Maaate · 15/01/2026 22:24

They would end up spending more money if they actually brought a case that could go "all the way" in court...

I wonder what GLP will do if the case makes it to court. Virgin will be presenting legal arguments about whether there is a requirement to make alternative provision for trans people who aren’t happy to use changing rooms based on sex, and if there is, what standard it should be. Will GLP engage with these arguments or will they stick to arguing Virgin’s changing rooms policy is wrong and must be reversed? If they don’t engage with arguments on alternative provision I think they are not acting in the best interests of trans people. And if they do they’ll upset TRAs.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page