Eva Vlaadingerbroek has been banned from travelling to the UK

[happydappy2]

https://x.com/EvaVlaar/status/2011480716165484637?s=20

I am seriously worried for the future of this country.

Who is she and what does she stand for?

Let alone giving X as a link which most of the world doesn't use. And cant see.

(You would have hoped after the stripping women option on X that all women would have joined forces and stopped using X!)

She’s evidently Far Right - one of Tommy’s crew.

Another of her posts:

Eva Vlaardingerbroek

@EvaVlaar
·
27 Apr 2024

Here it is! The full speech I gave at #CPACHungary that the establishment is losing its absolute mind about. I spoke the forbidden truth: The Great Replacement is no longer a theory - it’s reality. White Europeans are being replaced in their own countries at an ever accelerating rate and it will mean the end of our civilization if we don’t turn things around.

Good.

And, frankly, why should we let people like her into the country @happydappy2?

So in line with banning Geert Wilders some years ago.

It's a slippery slope if you ban someone from entering the UK when they haven't done anything illegal!

So so a shill for the far right, I won't lose any sleep over her being banned

You dont seem to understand the basis on which she was band.

For decades (proabably centuries) the UK has banned people from entering the UK who are thought to be likely to promote hate and agitation.

This happens to both those of the far left and the far right.

Myabe the problem is it that you aren't aware of this.

Why is this about sex and gender or am I missing something?

Exactly my thoughts

Just another attempt at force-teaming women's rights with the far right I guess

FWR is NOT only about sex and gender. That is the mis impression created by MNHQ mis naming what has always been and still is the Feminism and Women's Rights forum (have a look at the URL for FWR).

But even if it was stupidly just sex and gender it is possible to have a view as a feminist on how women are treated or thought of.

Or even a promotion of women being treated equally as for the most part hate speakers who have been banned are men.

So maybe a "win" for women's equality?!

There is a feminism section (as well as this sex and gender section) for what you're alluding to.

Lots of people have been banned from entering the UK

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_banned_from_entering_the_United_Kingdom

Yep, and not getting a right of appeal with a refused visitor visa is the normal order of things here. She can challenge via judicial review if she wants, same as anyone else.

If you mean feminism "chat" that is the refuge for the nice women who dont want to have to talk about men imposing their rights over women's realities.

As I say this has been since it was first set up the forum about women's rights.

MNHQ can call it what they like. The content is created by the users.

If you want to "chat" about feminism nothing to stop you having a chat (which of course wouldn't be feminism as it excludes talking about the attack on women's sex based rights as it just isn't "kind" to do that).

Were you part of MN when they created this false distintiction without consultation and making absolutely no sense whatsoever?

@IwantToRetire A woman being banned from the UK for her right wing opinions and activism is more akin to the political chat rather than sex and gender. And it seems I'm not the only one who thinks this.

She's a big campaigner for Dutch farmers against their government's/EU's disastrous policies.

Not really. We ban hate preachers too - most recently Islamic but I have a vague memory of an American Christian preacher a few years back.

Fred Phelps?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/hampshire/7898972.stm

Another one we've coped very well without.

I think you dont understand at all.

And this comes up over and over again, because those who haven't been on FWR aren't aware of its origins, and certainly aren't the sort of goody 2 shoes girls who thinks they should do what a supposed "leader" thinks they should do.

As I say if you want to "chat" with contributors who dont believe that women are oppressed because of their sex why dont you go an "chat" with them.

You are aware are you that there are different strands of feminism.

One of which is that the basis of women's oppression is that the sex class of men discriminate against women because of their sex.

She is an exponent of the great replacement theory. Usually means far right ding dong and we have enough of those already.

Didn't we recently let in a terrorist?

Take a look at the titles of chats under "sex and gender"