Eva Vlaadingerbroek has been banned from travelling to the UK

[happydappy2]

https://x.com/EvaVlaar/status/2011480716165484637?s=20

I am seriously worried for the future of this country.

Because they're British citizens, she isn't and is trying to enter to spread her "hate speech". Others have been refused entry for the same reasons

@BundleBoogie please look at this, it's happened quite a lot before and isn't limited to this gov

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_banned_from_entering_the_United_Kingdom

@SnackQueen 🥱

I’ve not heard of her but just saw it on IG

The posters shrugging below are not surprising.

Just the one?

Re: chat or FWR - no one uses chat, it's largely moribund. The whole idea was silly and probably it should just be re-merged.

As far as the OP point - countries do have the right to refuse people they see as agitators. On the other hand, what's good for the goose.... We might not have seen things like LWS in New Zealand, and all that came from that, if that was too heavily enforced.

My inclination is to allow anyone to visit who doesn't say anything that would be illegal for a citizen to say.

Is the Great Reset a conspiracy, I distinctly remember tech bro types talking about it during covid.

And I've certainly heard Democrat political figures in the US in past years say that eventually mass immigration would mean Republicans would never get voted in.

I said before she shouldn’t be allowed
but now take that back having reconsidered.

It seems that anyone critical of the current UK gov't is persona non grata. Anyone uncomfortable with uncontrolled mass immigration of males from countries with very different cultures to our own, is labelled far fight. What if one day your views don't align with the party in power? It's madness. She is a law abiding European citizen.

When I see the kind of people who are proponents of the Great Replacement Theory, I think - hmmm.. maybe that wouldn't be such a bad idea.

White Americans complaining about a group of people being forcibly replaced by a different group of people coming from other parts of the word must make Native Americans think 'Have they ever read an American history book?'

As British citizens we can have opposing views to any government. She is not a British citizen and is an activist. Virtually all governments here and abroad restrict the entry of non citizens who are activists for such movements. The far right is the second largest threat as far as MI5 are concerned at the moment. They were the first threat for many years.

We (the UK) banned all high-profile Soviet cultural figures for a while in the forties on the basis that their visits were USSR state propaganda. I think he was caught up in that general policy. Silly really, since he was considered a problem by the USSR for his opposition to their government and was fairly fortunate to survive the purges. We let him in later, though, post-Stalin. We gave him an honorary Oxford degree and everything, so we obviously figured it out! 🙂

Seems based to me. I’m happy not no have people who encourage violence and conflict in the country.

Well, you’ve answered my earlier question

i suppose that depends on if you think people should be held accountable for the actions of their ancestors.

White Americans complaining about a group of people being forcibly replaced by a different group of people coming from other parts of the word must make Native Americans think 'Have they ever read an American history book?'

But isn’t it widely agreed that that was A Very Bad Thing? Surely we should learn from the mistakes of the past and avoid repeating them - not do it again but bigger.

I'm inclined to agree with your analysis, even for people whose ideas I disagree with. As long as people aren't inciting violence, breaking defamation or libel laws, or supporting terrorism, I think freedom of speech is an important value to uphold.

I admire the fact that Americans are entitled to freedom of speech in their country's founding constitution. Freedom of speech is something that, in the last couple of decades following the ubiquity of the internet, a lot of Western govts are trying to reduce via salami-slicing legislation, or are allowing heavy-handed policing of speech, when it's used to criticise them and their policies.

So Hitler was a vegetarian, so what?

Extreme right wingers love to bandwaggon on anti-EU stories because it gets them clicks and helps their paymaster Vlad Putin destabilise the west.

Interesting list, thank you. I can see among the serious convicted criminals, Islamic hate preachers and actual Nazis, there is someone else banned for their theories on population replacement and immigration.

Given the declared intentions of some powerful Muslims and Muslim groups including Humza Yousaf and Anas Sarwar (did anyone see his leaked speech to Muslim leaders in Scotland promising them far greater power at the top of government and claiming that Muslims kept the country running during Covid as well as unilaterally deeming them to be true Scots), are we so sure these theories are so wrong?

Surely the whole point of a theory is to discuss it and work out if it has any legs? Rather than just banning anyone who mentions it?

Some Muslims are trying to warn us about what is ahead - they’ve lived it elsewhere and don’t want to go through it again. Even Baroness Falkner referred to it.

I would also agree with yourself and Tempest.

Agreeing that someone should be able to speak does not necessarily mean you're endorsing what they say.

The far right is the second largest threat as far as MI5 are concerned at the moment.

but the Islamic threat is by far and away the biggest threat to our country according to MI5 and they have actually killed and injured thousands and there are many active threats currently being dealt with. Apparently at least 19 identified terrorists have entered on small boats and have started an asylum claim so we can’t deport them.

I don’t know much about Eva but it sounds like a large part of the issue our government has with her is that she’s talking about immigration which is fast becoming a forbidden topic. Why can’t we discuss the circumstances which are allowing actual terrorists to enter our country and stay against our wishes?

You don't know anything about the topic of the thread but you're sure it's because we can't talk about one of the most talked about issue in uk politics?

the truth is the gov't has the power to keep out people who are articulate enough to criticise them. They don't have the power to keep out males from far away countries who enter the UK via small boats-these people tax payers are expected to foot the bill for housing & feeding. You might conclude our gov't are powerless to protect our borders....but just don't talk about that or you'll be in trouble.