Trans woman gym goer caught masturbating in women’s changing room

[LesbianNana]

I’ve included the NY Post article, the original TikTok video and an American police officer YouTuber video (Officer Tatum). This was in California (naturally) at a Planet Fitness gym.

In the beginning of the YouTube video you can see him clearly masturbating (along with his huge gross feet all splayed out), and if you want to avoid YouTube commentary jump to 4:30 for the confrontation.

I’ll transcribe some of the confrontation. It’s a few gym employees, the woman and her boyfriend.

BF: Bro do you go to the Taco Bell restroom and jack off? (Probably.) What the fuck is wrong with you bro? (AGP.)

Woman: Minors walking through here…(Probably the point.)

Trans: You guys, I was IN the stall. (Tip of the hat for not jacking off while at the bench press.)

BF: It does NOT FUCKING MATTER bro.

Trans: I’m not harassing anyone in the stall…I’m allowed to be in here.

Woman: You’re IN THE WOMAN’S BATHROOM.

BF: It doesn’t matter, you’re not allowed to jerk off in here! That is so fucking weird! We have video fucking proof!

Trans: Um are you allowed to video in here? (Attention women: Never video the actions of a man committing a lewd act in public lest it make a man look bad.)

BF: It doesn’t matter, you’re in the women’s bathroom jerking your fucking penis bro!

Trans: I’m transgender! (Here we go! The magic word. All take the knee and beg for forgiveness for your blasphemous ways at the shrine of Transgender!) I was drying off…(HAHAHA.)

Woman: That was you in the shower, too. (Feck’s sake.)

Trans: Right…

At this rate, we’re probably a mere 5 years away from the normalization of public masturbation.

Masturbation Story Hour coming to a library near you! Bring the whole family!

https://nypost.com/2026/01/05/us-news/trans-gymgoer-caught-masturbating-in-womens-bathroom-at-california-planet-fitness/

https://www.tiktok.com/@borderlinebimbo_/video/7591708460211866910

Post it yourself if you think it proves a point. It's certainly irrelevant to mine.

Kimura · 14/01/2026 04:47
Quite the character it seems!

But if you post up the history of this Quite the character you have to look at the people in the community who stand beside him.

Exactly.

It’s very odd that defending torturing and rapist attempted murderers from criticism of anything other than “being stupid”, for instance, for inciting violence against gender critical feminists, is more pressing to some pp than refraining from making callous comments and failing to acknowledge the horrific crimes Baker committed.

It’s also very odd that someone who claims to work in violence prevention against women:

doesn’t understand how these situations can escalate
doesnt understand that dehumanising women makes it easier to commit violence against us
doesnt understand red flags
mocks women’s fear of violent men
downplays horrific male violence
handwaves away direct threats by violent men as “not serious”
disingenuously denies having done these things.

I can absolutely believe however that people with this seeming lack of understanding of male violence do work in this area, as there are real problems with the women’s sector IMO.

And all this on a thread about a man masturbating in a women’s changing room, which is the kind of thing women here knew would happen when policies were made to let this group of men in.

He performed a lewd act in a female only safe space....

The reason why we have these female only spaces is based on the Worst Case Scenario of a 'minority' of males. That's our point.

He told people to punch terfs. STOP minimising it by saying it was 'very stupid' and merely 'two years ago'. How is that different from Lucy Connolly, who didn't even tell anyone to burn down hotels (only that she personally wouldn't care if they did)? Why is one that directly incites violence against a group (women) ok and not prosecuted, but the other that does not directly incite violence, isn't?

FFS! A male advocating violence against women is NOT merely 'incredibly stupid'. It was dangerous. Hateful, misogynistic, violent, abhorrent, evil, and unforgiveable! Stop minimising male violence against women.

It was an activist judge. You probably know this but since Kimura had alluded to it being a reasonable decision that Baker wasn’t convicted, this is the judge

https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/judge-who-inadvertently-liked-offensive-post-formally-warned/5119985.article

Oh, the Tanweer Ikhram who put all the compelled pronoun bullshit in the version of the Equal Treatment Bench Book that was current when Tanis Wolf was in court for punching Maria Maclaughlin?

Or any different from Graham Linehan getting arrested at Heathrow airport by five armed police officers for saying on X, “If a trans-identified male is in a female-only space, he is committing a violent, abusive act. Make a scene, call the cops and if all else fails, punch him in the balls.”

He got arrested five or six months after the tweet, and there hadn’t been a rash of ball-punching since then, yet he was still arrested and prosecuted.

While I have found the conversation about SJB mildly interesting, I fail to see what the fuck it has to do with a bloke having a ham shank in a women's single sex space.

Yes, he should have been arrested and men promptly banned from female spaces. It’s outrageous to think women and girls must meekly accept that a perverted man may be wanking and groaning in the cubicle next to you. It’s all part of the acceptable collateral damage of allowing men in female spaces.

Of course, this is California, where parents can lose custody of their children if they refuse to affirm their child’s gender transition, including surgery.

One family saw which way the wind was blowing, agreed with everything the lunatics were saying about their child’s transition, and moved to Texas in the dead of night.

https://reduxx.info/california-family-loses-custody-of-daughter-after-refusing-to-medically-affirm-her-transgender-identity/

👍
It's the usual hair-splitting interruption that's designed to derail discussion of the topic and to get us to use up the thread, thereby dropping it down the front page of FWR 🙄

Oh yes I’d forgotten about that bit!

What pisses me off is how the goal-posts are constantly moving.

First it was, “We just want to pee” and now it’s “Well, we may also rape you or your child, steal your used tampons, wank in the stall next to you, or expose our erections to you and your child.”

All of the above have happened in female single sex spaces, some countless times, and yet there are still people brushing it off and defending this! What will be normalized next? Group Sex Story Hour at the library near you?

I just can’t take any of these people seriously. Not so much the activists because they are at least honest, if deranged, the faux “kind” brigade.

Hi @LesbianNana I know this isn't the point of the thread (even though it has annoyingly been derailed anyway) so apologies for a further derailment, but this sentence from your post above about California actually intrigued me;

"One family saw which way the wind was blowing, agreed with everything the lunatics were saying about their child’s transition, and moved to Texas in the dead of night"

How did you hear about that and are this family ok now they moved to Texas? Mad that this is what they had to do to escape the transition of their child by the state. I used to live in California so it's hit home to me that this state has embraced gender ideology so enthusiastically.

Linehan was released without even being charged right? He wasn't prosecuted.

I don't think he was trying to actually incite violence either.

How is that different from Lucy Connolly, who didn't even tell anyone to burn down hotels (only that she personally wouldn't care if they did)?

Connolly wasn't charged with incitement to violence. She was charged with inciting racial hatred.

Why is one that directly incites violence against a group (women) ok and not prosecuted, but the other that does not directly incite violence, isn't?

Both were prosecuted. One pled guilty, the other was cleared. Something not reaching the bar of being a crime doesn't mean it's 'ok'.