Trans woman gym goer caught masturbating in women’s changing room

[LesbianNana]

I’ve included the NY Post article, the original TikTok video and an American police officer YouTuber video (Officer Tatum). This was in California (naturally) at a Planet Fitness gym.

In the beginning of the YouTube video you can see him clearly masturbating (along with his huge gross feet all splayed out), and if you want to avoid YouTube commentary jump to 4:30 for the confrontation.

I’ll transcribe some of the confrontation. It’s a few gym employees, the woman and her boyfriend.

BF: Bro do you go to the Taco Bell restroom and jack off? (Probably.) What the fuck is wrong with you bro? (AGP.)

Woman: Minors walking through here…(Probably the point.)

Trans: You guys, I was IN the stall. (Tip of the hat for not jacking off while at the bench press.)

BF: It does NOT FUCKING MATTER bro.

Trans: I’m not harassing anyone in the stall…I’m allowed to be in here.

Woman: You’re IN THE WOMAN’S BATHROOM.

BF: It doesn’t matter, you’re not allowed to jerk off in here! That is so fucking weird! We have video fucking proof!

Trans: Um are you allowed to video in here? (Attention women: Never video the actions of a man committing a lewd act in public lest it make a man look bad.)

BF: It doesn’t matter, you’re in the women’s bathroom jerking your fucking penis bro!

Trans: I’m transgender! (Here we go! The magic word. All take the knee and beg for forgiveness for your blasphemous ways at the shrine of Transgender!) I was drying off…(HAHAHA.)

Woman: That was you in the shower, too. (Feck’s sake.)

Trans: Right…

At this rate, we’re probably a mere 5 years away from the normalization of public masturbation.

Masturbation Story Hour coming to a library near you! Bring the whole family!

https://nypost.com/2026/01/05/us-news/trans-gymgoer-caught-masturbating-in-womens-bathroom-at-california-planet-fitness/

https://www.tiktok.com/@borderlinebimbo_/video/7591708460211866910

I don't know who Baker is, but I've had a quick read up and watched the video and yeah, extremely stupid/potentially dangerous thing to say. I don't think it's fair to say that she's out there 'rallying people to punch TERFS' based on one unrepeated, apologised for comment from two years ago, or that a politician supporting her activism today is somehow endorsing that.

Are you honest enough to list the criminal history of this individual and where you would place him in you assessment between
Reasonable person
and
Scumbag not worth the time of day?

A recognised tool of abusive political control and a war crime should not be taken seriously

When someone shows you who they are, believe them.

I don't know who Baker is, but I've had a quick read up and watched the video and yeah, extremely stupid/potentially dangerous thing to say. I don't think it's fair to say that she's out there 'rallying people to punch TERFS' based on one unrepeated, apologised for comment from two years ago, or that a politician supporting her activism today is somehow endorsing that.

Again. Fuck! This continued dismissal is revealing.

I come across Baker quite regularly at events where Baker has decided to 'rally' many young people who are carrying signs that are just as violent and who are very keen to intimidate women who want to speak in a public place

But .... I MUST remember that Baker is not to be taken seriously because he apologised...

If you seriously cannot see the dismissal in your posts, then I don't know what else we can do to highlight it considering the beacons we are shining on them. All I am seeing is, women you are over reacting, a bloke holding signage with rape and death threats is not going to be taken seriously by anyone and you should not consider it a 'serious' threat. And a bloke who has been to prison for kidnap, torture, attempted murder and who ate his own testes should be considered as not 'rallying people to be violent' despite him leading protests that are very heavy on the intimidation and violence at every opportunity.

Or... is it that we should just avoid him and not attend events where he might be, but hey .... he apologised and it WAS two years ago.

By the way, see how different it also reads when Baker's correct sex pronouns are used? Doesn't seem so dismissible in my opinion when it is made very clear that Baker is a man.

I don't know who Baker is, but I've had a quick read up and watched the video and yeah, extremely stupid/potentially dangerous thing to say. I don't think it's fair to say that she's out there 'rallying people to punch TERFS' based on one unrepeated, apologised for comment from two years ago

UNREPEATED???

That violent sexist thug literally took a recording of his threat, the one he had previously been forgiven for breaking the terms of his bail because he "apologised for" it, looped it and played it on a loudspeaker to intimidate and disrupt a Feminist protest!!!

Can't really get more repeated than that, or prove any more clearly how fake his apology was.

I respectfully suggest, rather than admitting you know almost nothing about what has been happening but nevertheless feeling entitled to argue that what we are saying is happening can't posdibly be happening because it's not what a reasonable person would do, you spend a bit of time reading trans reddit, Bluesky and trans voices on Medium to see just how far their idea of "reasonable" has moved away from yours.

It's not possible to convince the righteous. It's boring and a waste of time, I shouldn't have bothered. Real issues to deal with. Like making the government follow the law instead of overturn it to force non consenting women to have no place they can take their clothes off without men there, a number of whom enjoy posting and doing things as mentioned above.

Phillipson, you first. Show me. Lead the way. Go in with Baker and shower, I'll hold your coat.

The man attends seemingly every women only/ feminist event with his loud hailer and rallies young men to call women fascists and all sorts of things. And to generally intimidate women who disagree that he is any type of woman at every opportunity. He is there with the loud noise makers also. He is aggressive and he is intent on silencing women. I mean, I have seen him numerous times on video and in person.

She’s alright though…. Just a woman saying stupid things and all.

But apparently, he has apologised…and it WAS two years ago!

I think that @Kimura is trying to say that someone who threatens rape as a response to disagreement is a person whose position or arguments should not be taken seriously. And not that they’re saying threats of rape should not be taken seriously. They can correct me if I’m wrong.

Given your general limited understanding of or exposure to these concerns about trans women inserting themselves into female only spaces, please reread Seethlaw · Today 08:56 comments to understand the general position in the trans community. Seethlaw knows of which they speak as a trans man.

@Kimura
I genuinely think you should follow this suggestion from @FlirtsWithRhinos :

spend a bit of time reading trans reddit, Bluesky and trans voices on Medium to see just how far their idea of "reasonable" has moved away from yours.

It will open your eyes.

How, materially, does a trans-identfying man differ from all the other men? You cannot identify into oppression. You cannot identify into being a minority.

Has anyone posed a suggestion which male extreme transgender activists law and policy makers ‘should’ take seriously if it isn’t the ones threatening and intimidating women? Are there any male extreme transgender rights activists who are not intimidating women? All that I know of intimidate women by deliberating using female single sex provisions.

The dismissal is not just about the threat to punch women. The dismissal is also that he ‘apologised’ and that it was two years ago.

There are a few posters who are likely wanking on their keyboards while reading and/or posting.

Please spare a thought for the repair technicians at Currys PC World.

He was on licence and that is why he apologised. He didn't want to go back to prison. I don't believe for one second that he was sorry.

You do grasp the concept that men and women's toilet/changing facilities were segregated to begin with in order to prevent incidents like this happening in the first place?

What you're suggesting is basically kick men in dresses out AFTER these types of incidents. In this respect, you are accepting the fact that women are the unfortunate collateral damage in the fight to figure out who the 'good' ones are and who the 'bad' ones are.

Well you can do one. They all need keeping out, to keep us safe from the bad ones. Not kicked out DURING the incident, not kicked out AFTER the incident. The fucking incident shouldn't happen in the first place.

And how do we ensure the incident doesn't happen in the first place? Keep men, all men, whether that be small ones, tall ones, black ones, white ones, left-wing ones, right wing ones, fat bellied ones, skinny ones, those dressed in men's clothing, those dressed in womens clothing. ALL.

Firstly, HIS activism.

Secondly, man in dress leads angry, supposedly victimized and fighting for their rights, TERF hating protest and you think he, the ringleader LITERALLY shouting "punch a fucking TERF" is not an incitement of violence?

Ohh, do you have a link, I’d love to read this

Quite the opposite, anyone who responds to your difference of opinion with threats of rape should be taken very bloody seriously. Women can still rape with their penis you know?

He might have meant it. But it is irrelevant. He turns up and intimidates women meeting up whenever he can so whether he still says ‘punch terfs in the face’ he is still intimidating and supporting violent threats to women.

The Narcissist's Prayer:

That didn't happen.
And if it did, it wasn't that bad.
And if it was, that's not a big deal.
And if it is, that's not my fault.
And if it was, I didn't mean it.
And if I did, you deserved it.

When transactivists have:

• posed with knives and swords in women's loos
• punched women
• made credible bomb threats against women's meetings
• broken Wes Streeting MP's windows
• broken the windows of the building hosting FiLiA and covered it in pink paint
• tried to have women fired (e.g. Forstater)
• hounded women out of their jobs (e.g. Stock)
• harrassed trade union officials on picket lines
• thrown soup at women (KJK)

we would be suicidal not to take decapitation threats seriously.

It’s been deleted but it’s still possible to read it somewhere I think, I will try to find one.

It’s perfectly fair to say that, given that he is. But do feel free to fret about “fairness” to a man who orally raped and physically and psychologically tortured a young man he abducted and attempted to murder someone else.

Quite the character it seems!

I won't be fretting about someone I'd never heard of until today, I just find it funny when people feel the need to bend the truth to justify something.

Rallies would mean it was done more than once (or was still being done), which as far as I can see it wasn't, but happy to be corrected.

I'd argue it wasn't even done once, given that nobody was 'rallied' to go looking for people to punch in the face, nobody got punched in the face and a court found that it was unlikely they'd expected anyone to act on their words when clearing them of incitement to violence.

All I know about them I've read on Wikipedia and a couple of online articles about this arrest today, but I'm pretty confident that they're going very high on the Scumbag Not Worth Listening To end of the scale, with a little sticker saying 'Nutter' next to their name for good measure.

I certainly wouldn't give anything they've got to say the time of day. Clearly fucking dim for saying something like that while on license for a start.

So what you se to be saying is, women should ignore all the threats and the violence because they’re coming from males with a trans identity. What if a male without a trans identity threatens us with rape and violence? Do we ignore those as well? When should we take these threats seriously? When one women gets attacked or do you have a different number? What about the psychological effect on women caused by hulking great men threatening them, and then demanding to enter their spaces because they’re really women?

Well the thing is...that's not what I'm saying at all. I haven't said it once in fact. I didn't say it in my original post (which was a question about whether you'd consider someone who threatened to rape you over a difference of opinion a 'serious person' representative of their community) and I've lost track of the number of times I've reiterated it, and clarified that at no point have I claimed violent threats shouldn't be taken seriously.

Yet despite all that, it seems that some people are desperate for me to have said it, so they just keep claiming that I have said it.

What's really tickled me is that the person you're suggesting thinks women should ignore violent threats has spent about 15 years of their adult life in a second career teaching women how to fight and defend themselves. Couldn't make it up.