Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Girlguiding - Supreme Court Decision email

518 replies

ProfMummBRaaarrrTheEverLeaking · 02/12/2025 14:07

Have just had an email from them...

As the parent of a young member in Girlguiding, following April’s Supreme Court decision relating to sex and gender, we wanted to give you an update. Many organisations across the country have been facing complex decisions about what it means for girls and women and for the wider communities affected, including us.

Girlguiding’s governing charity documents set out that the membership and people who benefit from our organisation are girls and women. In April, the Supreme Court ruled that girls and women are defined in the Equality Act 2010 by their biological sex at birth.

Following detailed considerations, expert legal advice and input from senior members, young members and our Council, Girlguiding’s Board of Trustees has made the difficult decision that Girlguiding must change Girlguiding must change, following the Supreme Court’s ruling.

From today, 2 December, it is with a heavy heart that we are announcing trans girls and young women will no longer be able to join Girlguiding. This is a decision we would have preferred not to make, and we know that this may be upsetting for members of our community.

There will be no immediate changes for current young members but more information will be shared next week.

Most adult roles, including unit helpers, district helpers and administrative support, are already open to all, so we are confident that no volunteers will have to leave the organisation.

Girlguiding believes strongly in our value of inclusion, and we will continue to support young people and adults in marginalised groups. Over the next few months, we'll explore opportunities to champion this value and actively support young people who need us.

You can find our full statement and updated policy on our website.

We are proud to be the UK’s largest youth organisation dedicated to girls and is focused on creating an equal world for girls and young women. For over 100 years, we have been a welcoming space for all girls to have new experiences, support their communities, build friendships and grow their confidence.

While Girlguiding may feel a little different going forward, these core aims and principles will always be the same. We remain committed to treating everyone with dignity and respect, particularly those from marginalised groups that have felt the biggest impact of this decision.

If you have any immediate questions, we have our special support team in place, to give volunteers, parents and carers the best support we can. We are asking Girlguiding HQ, trading and country/region staff to refer any volunteer or parent who has questions about this announcement.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
WeNeedToTalkAboutIT · 04/12/2025 20:07

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 04/12/2025 20:01

my guess is you’re a 50 year old lady behind a keyboard who knows little.

Here comes the ageism.

Middle-aged lesbians exist.

If anybody here needs a palate cleanser from the ageism, sexism and homophobia tonight, I wholly recommend the Instagram account, lil.lesbian.nan 😎

JanesLittleGirl · 04/12/2025 20:12

@OneLoftyPombear Guess you should've stayed away from the 'and then they came after the Lesbians' false teaming schtick then.

ProfessorBettyBooper · 04/12/2025 20:24

JanesLittleGirl · 04/12/2025 20:12

@OneLoftyPombear Guess you should've stayed away from the 'and then they came after the Lesbians' false teaming schtick then.

Oh, our lovely ploppers,

They came with such aplomb.

Then left.

Who'd have thunk.

SexRealismBeliefs · 04/12/2025 20:40

Another male centred email from a male about the Girls Guide 😤

Good Evening,

We realise this will be upsetting for many of our members and volunteers, as it has been for us,
but we believe it is a necessary change to preserve our legacy as the largest youth organisation dedicated entirely to girls

Girlguiding still believes strongly in inclusion and we will continue to support young people and adults in marginalised groups.

Over the next few months, we will explore potential ways to champion this value while remaining within in the law.

We recognise that the trans community needs our solidarity now more than ever

We are establishing a taskforce to work with members to consider how our offer could evolve under this new policy.

Within that taskforce, we will explore new inclusive offers that continue to operate in the interest of women and girls inside the law.

Thank you for sharing your thoughts with us. We appreciate your perspective and your support during this time.

Our priority now is to ensure we continue to deliver our mission with care and respect for everyone in our community.
Kind regards,
Daniel
Girlguiding
17-19 Buckingham Palace Road
London
SW1W

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 04/12/2025 20:43

OneLoftyPombear · 04/12/2025 19:10

I’m a bit worried about this message, I’d rephrase as might make women who have been a victim of SA by another woman feel like it’s not as bad.
though going through that and what you went through is horrific and I’m sorry it happened to you

Translation: "You are talking about your sexual assaults the wrong way, where 'the wrong way' is defined as 'stating the reality that only men and boys can leave women and girls pregnant and asserting that this matters'."

The phrase "one thing I wouldn't have had to worry about" indicates that there are other things that a sexual assault victim has to worry about, regardless of the sex of the perpetrator. But there are material differences for the female victim of a male rapist, and these matter, and the fear of those material differences will very likely affect how the female victim of a male sexual assault perpetrator feels during the SA, even if he chooses to stop short of rape.

The victim of a female perpetrator can disclose in her own time, get counselling in her own time. No one is claiming that she won't need those things, but I am arguing that she can take as much time as she wants to access support. Arguably, she may feel a heightened sense of betrayal at being attacked by another woman or girl and will need tailored support for that. Not explicitly mentioning this isn't pretending that it isn't the case, it's leaving off-topic material out of a forum post that is about the impact of men and boys in female spaces on the women and girls. And she still has all the time she wants to access support. Autistic people often take a long time to process things, so if she's autistic, she might need a lot of time.

The female victim of a rapist (who, by law, are all male) must immediately get emergency contraception. She must anxiously await her period. If her period is late, she must take a pregnancy test. If she is pregnant, she must decide whether to continue the pregnancy and arrange abortion or midwifery care. All of this is time-pressured. And, as I said, if she's autistic, she's struggling to process this quickly enough and she's at greatly-elevated risk of rape and SA in the first place.

Additionally, if the victim is of Girl Guide age, she may not be aware of abortion as an option. I wasn't taught about abortion at school and my parents didn't mention it. So I'm having my cunt groped by a boy and I'm terrified that he's going to escalate to rape and I'm going to be stuck with a baby that I don't want with no way to avert that. Try to get inside my mind and actually to feel how scared I was. Imagine that your sexual assault is over and you feel relieved that he didn't go further. Imagine how much that fucks with your head.

Now imagine that she's at Guide camp on day two of a week-long camp, in a farmer's field in the middle of nowhere, if my Guide camps were anything to go by, with no way to get to a pharmacy for emergency contraception and too afraid and ashamed to ask a leader for help.

Having Guides be 100% female eliminates the possibility of rape and completely erases that fear. It's the most obvious safeguarding measure to protect women and girls, especially the autistic and otherwise disabled ones.

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 04/12/2025 20:49

SexRealismBeliefs · 04/12/2025 20:40

Another male centred email from a male about the Girls Guide 😤

Good Evening,

We realise this will be upsetting for many of our members and volunteers, as it has been for us,
but we believe it is a necessary change to preserve our legacy as the largest youth organisation dedicated entirely to girls

Girlguiding still believes strongly in inclusion and we will continue to support young people and adults in marginalised groups.

Over the next few months, we will explore potential ways to champion this value while remaining within in the law.

We recognise that the trans community needs our solidarity now more than ever

We are establishing a taskforce to work with members to consider how our offer could evolve under this new policy.

Within that taskforce, we will explore new inclusive offers that continue to operate in the interest of women and girls inside the law.

Thank you for sharing your thoughts with us. We appreciate your perspective and your support during this time.

Our priority now is to ensure we continue to deliver our mission with care and respect for everyone in our community.
Kind regards,
Daniel
Girlguiding
17-19 Buckingham Palace Road
London
SW1W

Daniel?

Why is a man working for GG?

forgotmyusername1 · 04/12/2025 21:19

OneLoftyPombear · 04/12/2025 18:36

Lesbians aren’t a monolith, and the idea that every single lesbian is repulsed by trans women is a myth pushed by a loud minority.

Real life isn’t a YouGov poll from 2019 or a Detroit study that conveniently only asked people who already hate the idea. Plenty of lesbians are perfectly happy dating, sleeping with, and loving trans women. You only have to look at actual relationships to see it.

Thousands of lesbians are partnered with trans women right now. They post on Reddit (r/actuallesbians has been full of happy trans/lesbian couples for years), they’re on TikTok, they’re at Pride holding hands, they’re getting married. The lesbian scene in cities like London, Manchester, Brighton and Glasgow is full of cis lesbians who actively seek out trans girlfriends because they’re attracted to women, full stop, not to a specific surgical history or chromosome checklist.

Sexual orientation is about gender, not genitals. The whole “nobody is attracted to a piece of paper” line from FWS was about legal sex for single-sex spaces, not about who you fall in love with.

Attraction is messy and individual. Some lesbians love trans women pre-op, some prefer post-op, some don’t care either way. Insisting every lesbian must reject trans women is just trying to police women’s sexuality all over again.

Lesbian bars and dating apps that are genuinely welcoming to trans women don’t “collapse”; they thrive. L-Word nights in Soho, the Her app’s trans-inclusive filters, Club Revenge in Brighton, they’re packed. The venues that struggle are the ones that deliberately exclude trans women and then wonder why younger lesbians walk away.

Being a lesbian means loving women. Trans women are women. If a lesbian is into her, great. If she isn’t, also fine, nobody is forcing anyone into bed. But pretending trans women have no place in lesbian spaces at all is gatekeeping, not protecting homosexuality. It just leaves happy, real-life lesbian/trans couples on the outside looking in, and that’s the actual homophobia.

Yes, there are studies and surveys showing that a notable portion of lesbians are open to dating trans women, though rates vary and attraction is always individual.

The most cited one is Blair and Hoskin’s 2019 study on dating preferences, with 958 participants (mostly young adults in North America). It found that 29 per cent of lesbians were willing to consider trans partners, though many showed a bias towards trans men over trans women (likely due to social stigmas around transfemininity). Still, that means nearly one in three lesbians in the sample were open in principle, and real-world anecdotes from the study and beyond confirm actual relationships happen.
A 2025 vignette study echoed this, finding 28.8 per cent of lesbian women interested in dating a transgender person.

A 2023 YouGov poll in the UK showed 84 per cent of cis lesbians holding a positive view of trans people, far higher than the general public, with many expressing support for trans inclusion in lesbian spaces and relationships.

A 2023 Reddit discussion in r/actuallesbians referenced a UK poll where 84 per cent of lesbians supported trans women (higher than any other cis group), and another stat showing 96 per cent of Gen Z lesbians are trans-positive, with a “significant chunk” willing to date trans women if they present femininely. Users there shared stories of long-term partnerships with trans women, pre- and post-op.
Justin Lehmiller’s 2018 survey of over 4,000 Americans found one in four women (including lesbians) had fantasised about sex with a trans partner, suggesting underlying attraction exists even if not always acted on.

These aren’t huge majorities, but they debunk the idea that no lesbians date trans women. Plenty do, as seen in communities like TikTok, Pride events, and apps like Her. It’s not about forcing attraction, just recognising that for many lesbians, trans women are women they can love.

so please see that you are speaking for Gen Z and my guess is you’re a 50 year old lady behind a keyboard who knows little.

But how many of those lesbian couples were originally a male/female couple where one has transitioned and the other has stayed and become a lesbian?

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 04/12/2025 21:26

forgotmyusername1 · 04/12/2025 21:19

But how many of those lesbian couples were originally a male/female couple where one has transitioned and the other has stayed and become a lesbian?

the other has stayed and become a lesbian?

She hasn't. A woman fucking a man isn't a lesbian, unless he's her beard.

medievalpenny · 04/12/2025 21:28

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 04/12/2025 20:49

Daniel?

Why is a man working for GG?

They have had male employees for a very long time delivering operationally. That's not an issue here. The decision making all happens by women, the leadership roles are only for women, and the membership is only for girls.

The important point in that email is that the organisation are looking for ways to "evolve" their offering to serve males and are only listening to the violent mob protesting against the organisation's single sex status. That is what needs pushback from the majority of members who support this change to revert to being single sex but were bullied into silence. And are continuing to be intimidated into silence by emails like that.

ProfessorBettyBooper · 04/12/2025 21:43

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 04/12/2025 20:43

Translation: "You are talking about your sexual assaults the wrong way, where 'the wrong way' is defined as 'stating the reality that only men and boys can leave women and girls pregnant and asserting that this matters'."

The phrase "one thing I wouldn't have had to worry about" indicates that there are other things that a sexual assault victim has to worry about, regardless of the sex of the perpetrator. But there are material differences for the female victim of a male rapist, and these matter, and the fear of those material differences will very likely affect how the female victim of a male sexual assault perpetrator feels during the SA, even if he chooses to stop short of rape.

The victim of a female perpetrator can disclose in her own time, get counselling in her own time. No one is claiming that she won't need those things, but I am arguing that she can take as much time as she wants to access support. Arguably, she may feel a heightened sense of betrayal at being attacked by another woman or girl and will need tailored support for that. Not explicitly mentioning this isn't pretending that it isn't the case, it's leaving off-topic material out of a forum post that is about the impact of men and boys in female spaces on the women and girls. And she still has all the time she wants to access support. Autistic people often take a long time to process things, so if she's autistic, she might need a lot of time.

The female victim of a rapist (who, by law, are all male) must immediately get emergency contraception. She must anxiously await her period. If her period is late, she must take a pregnancy test. If she is pregnant, she must decide whether to continue the pregnancy and arrange abortion or midwifery care. All of this is time-pressured. And, as I said, if she's autistic, she's struggling to process this quickly enough and she's at greatly-elevated risk of rape and SA in the first place.

Additionally, if the victim is of Girl Guide age, she may not be aware of abortion as an option. I wasn't taught about abortion at school and my parents didn't mention it. So I'm having my cunt groped by a boy and I'm terrified that he's going to escalate to rape and I'm going to be stuck with a baby that I don't want with no way to avert that. Try to get inside my mind and actually to feel how scared I was. Imagine that your sexual assault is over and you feel relieved that he didn't go further. Imagine how much that fucks with your head.

Now imagine that she's at Guide camp on day two of a week-long camp, in a farmer's field in the middle of nowhere, if my Guide camps were anything to go by, with no way to get to a pharmacy for emergency contraception and too afraid and ashamed to ask a leader for help.

Having Guides be 100% female eliminates the possibility of rape and completely erases that fear. It's the most obvious safeguarding measure to protect women and girls, especially the autistic and otherwise disabled ones.

Yes, this. Thank you x

Lovelyview · 04/12/2025 22:13

GallantKumquat · 04/12/2025 19:12

🗣️️🗣️ what about the men 🗣️🗣️🗣️ think about the poor excluded men 🗣️🗣️ the untrophied men 🗣️ the under-served men ️🗣️ the waiting men 🗣️️🗣️ the misgendered men 🗣️🗣️🗣️ did I mention the men?

Yes, all those sad, sad men who can only possibly be happy in women's toilets, changing rooms, breastfeeding groups, menopause groups, prisons, rape crisis centres, homeless hostels, hospital wards, girl guide groups and the women's institute. Let's just think about those sad men's feelings because that's what's important here.😢

NeverDropYourMooncup · 04/12/2025 22:20

pawsedforthought · 04/12/2025 19:36

Adult trans people wait five to ten years for a first NHS appointment and many GPs still refuse to prescribe hormones even when told to by a specialist. Cis patients do not face that delay or refusal for comparable healthcare.

Anyone else with endometriosis or who has suffered because of male centrered healthcare take exception to this or is it just me????

If only it had taken 5 years for my diagnosis I may have avoided the multiple surgeries, the loss of an ovary, loss of jobs, physical and mental health, an ectopic pregnancy and to top it all 6 months on the evil drugs used as puberty blockers which may still have ongoing effects 20 years later.

I have male friends begging for cancer treatment from their nhs trusts but hey ho Trans people have it so much harder than anyone else that we should be kind.

I was referred to dermatology because I suddenly started growing thick, bristly facial hair (after the first time I'd been told at 24 that it was because I was getting older).

I was seen by a registrar two years later who gave me a piece of paper with his sister's beauty salon details on it because she'd be able to thread my face and there wasn't anything that could be done for it on the NHS. Oh, and if I suddenly had excruciating abdominal pain, I should go to A&E.

Apart from being referred because of a 'problem with my skin' instead of the hormonal disruption of having ovarian cysts and associated endocrine issues (so endocrinology or gynaecology would have been more appropriate), it doesn't feel particularly gender affirming to be growing a full beard when you aren't supposed to have one, does it? But there was no treatment, apparently. Nothing at all.

Mind you, I was referred in 2022 to gynae for further hormonal problems where I need medication that the GP can't or won't prescribe - first attempt at referral was in 2014 and that got bounced back on the grounds that I was too young to have hormonal problems. I've just had my first appointment confirmed from that referral. For May 2026. No delay or issues accessing hormonal treatments for biological women, you say?

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 04/12/2025 22:21

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 04/12/2025 20:43

Translation: "You are talking about your sexual assaults the wrong way, where 'the wrong way' is defined as 'stating the reality that only men and boys can leave women and girls pregnant and asserting that this matters'."

The phrase "one thing I wouldn't have had to worry about" indicates that there are other things that a sexual assault victim has to worry about, regardless of the sex of the perpetrator. But there are material differences for the female victim of a male rapist, and these matter, and the fear of those material differences will very likely affect how the female victim of a male sexual assault perpetrator feels during the SA, even if he chooses to stop short of rape.

The victim of a female perpetrator can disclose in her own time, get counselling in her own time. No one is claiming that she won't need those things, but I am arguing that she can take as much time as she wants to access support. Arguably, she may feel a heightened sense of betrayal at being attacked by another woman or girl and will need tailored support for that. Not explicitly mentioning this isn't pretending that it isn't the case, it's leaving off-topic material out of a forum post that is about the impact of men and boys in female spaces on the women and girls. And she still has all the time she wants to access support. Autistic people often take a long time to process things, so if she's autistic, she might need a lot of time.

The female victim of a rapist (who, by law, are all male) must immediately get emergency contraception. She must anxiously await her period. If her period is late, she must take a pregnancy test. If she is pregnant, she must decide whether to continue the pregnancy and arrange abortion or midwifery care. All of this is time-pressured. And, as I said, if she's autistic, she's struggling to process this quickly enough and she's at greatly-elevated risk of rape and SA in the first place.

Additionally, if the victim is of Girl Guide age, she may not be aware of abortion as an option. I wasn't taught about abortion at school and my parents didn't mention it. So I'm having my cunt groped by a boy and I'm terrified that he's going to escalate to rape and I'm going to be stuck with a baby that I don't want with no way to avert that. Try to get inside my mind and actually to feel how scared I was. Imagine that your sexual assault is over and you feel relieved that he didn't go further. Imagine how much that fucks with your head.

Now imagine that she's at Guide camp on day two of a week-long camp, in a farmer's field in the middle of nowhere, if my Guide camps were anything to go by, with no way to get to a pharmacy for emergency contraception and too afraid and ashamed to ask a leader for help.

Having Guides be 100% female eliminates the possibility of rape and completely erases that fear. It's the most obvious safeguarding measure to protect women and girls, especially the autistic and otherwise disabled ones.

Imagine that your sexual assault is over and you feel relieved that he didn't go further. Imagine how much that fucks with your head.

Not to mention feeling grateful to your assailant for graciously "only" groping your cunt and choosing not to put you at risk of forced pregnancy. As I said, it really fucks with your head.

These men and boys know that they cause those confused mixed-up feelings by stopping short of rape, it's part of the powertrip for them. My assailants laughed about it. No woman or girl has that power over other women and girls to induce that fear of pregnancy, nor can she induce those confused mixed-up feelings in her victim by stopping short of rape.

Policing how I and other victims of sexual assault talk about our own experiences is utter misogyny. Scolding women and girls when we recognise and talk about the structural power that men and boys have over us because of their and our biology is also utter misogyny.

Keeping Guides single-sex takes away any and all possibility of any girl being subjected to the fear of forced pregnancy whilst she's at a Guiding event. It creates a space where men have no power over women.

SternlyMatthews · 04/12/2025 23:08

Ereshkigalangcleg · 04/12/2025 18:28

Yes, I think that was the moment the penny truly dropped for the judges.

I read it as a a joke tbh, legal humour (& criticism too) tends to be quite restrained.

pawsedforthought · 04/12/2025 23:18

NeverDropYourMooncup · 04/12/2025 22:20

I was referred to dermatology because I suddenly started growing thick, bristly facial hair (after the first time I'd been told at 24 that it was because I was getting older).

I was seen by a registrar two years later who gave me a piece of paper with his sister's beauty salon details on it because she'd be able to thread my face and there wasn't anything that could be done for it on the NHS. Oh, and if I suddenly had excruciating abdominal pain, I should go to A&E.

Apart from being referred because of a 'problem with my skin' instead of the hormonal disruption of having ovarian cysts and associated endocrine issues (so endocrinology or gynaecology would have been more appropriate), it doesn't feel particularly gender affirming to be growing a full beard when you aren't supposed to have one, does it? But there was no treatment, apparently. Nothing at all.

Mind you, I was referred in 2022 to gynae for further hormonal problems where I need medication that the GP can't or won't prescribe - first attempt at referral was in 2014 and that got bounced back on the grounds that I was too young to have hormonal problems. I've just had my first appointment confirmed from that referral. For May 2026. No delay or issues accessing hormonal treatments for biological women, you say?

sending huge hugs, and wonder what wanktwatter medical school your doctors went to when 10 minutes with their feet up and a copy of Best would have given them a better starting point for diagnosis.....and wth you were 24 not 64!!! how in gods green earth did they square the evidence in front of their eyes with getting "older".

going to stop before i go on an epic rant because its way off topic but sending love, heat pads and chocolate

LostMySocks · 04/12/2025 23:34

DuchessFaceRobbin · 04/12/2025 18:04

I’m not sure why I’m posting here. It seems mostly people who are happy that transgirls will be banned from Guides are voicing their excitement over the announcement and displaying their bigotry here. I’m saddened by these voices, but genuinely curious about people’s views, perceptions, and knowledge of the trans community.

My daughter and her friends (ages 11/12) in Girl Guides are saddened by the announcement and will be discussing it with their troop leaders next week. Many parents I know are equally upset that the WI and GG have had to make these statements this week to avoid legal action. Protests and petitions will be forthcoming and the fight for trans rights will continue.

I’d like to ask if and why are you afraid of trans people and what threat you think a transgirl poses to a troop. I’m 50 years old and have known people from all the letters of the LGBTQ+ community most of my life and have not ever felt threatened by them. No one is trying to ‘convert’ heterosexuals or get people to change their gender. Given the current climate of hatred towards trans and gender non-conforming people (stirred up by billionaires, politicians, and the christian right), why would any child, teen, or adult “choose” to be trans? Certainly not to “infiltrate” toilets and girl’s only spaces. These people are marginalised as it is. Heterosexual cisgender men continue to be the biggest threat to each other, women, trans people…

Do any of you know anyone who is trans, non-binary, intersex? Biological sex is not as simple as you’d like it to be. 1.7% of the population is intersex - as common as twins. Approximately 1 in 4500 assigned female at birth women are born without wombs.

Ok, done rambling…

The good news is that trans identifying females (transboys and non binary) have always been and will always be welcomed as members.
Unfortunately all of the news articles have suggested that trans people are banned not that Guiding is returning to a girls only space as boys will no longer be able to join.

SternlyMatthews · 04/12/2025 23:55

Duchess: "Biological sex is not as simple as you’d like it to be. 1.7% of the population is intersex - as common as twins. "
We interupt the work of the Moomin family to observe that the figure of 1.7%, invented ('disputed' in academia speak) by Anne Fausto-Sterling is about 100 times too high. Also 'intersex' is an out of date term for Disorders of Sexual Development (DSDs), those affected are either male or female, not a mystical in-between, & the representatives of those affected have objected to being used as a political football by the gender faction.

ProfessorBettyBooper · 05/12/2025 00:47

SternlyMatthews · 04/12/2025 23:55

Duchess: "Biological sex is not as simple as you’d like it to be. 1.7% of the population is intersex - as common as twins. "
We interupt the work of the Moomin family to observe that the figure of 1.7%, invented ('disputed' in academia speak) by Anne Fausto-Sterling is about 100 times too high. Also 'intersex' is an out of date term for Disorders of Sexual Development (DSDs), those affected are either male or female, not a mystical in-between, & the representatives of those affected have objected to being used as a political football by the gender faction.

Honestly, the fact that someone cannot rationally work out, just by using their own brain, that there cannot possibly be as many people who are 'intersex' (their definition not mine) as there are twins is baffling.

It's actually quite frightening.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 05/12/2025 00:59

SternlyMatthews · 04/12/2025 23:08

I read it as a a joke tbh, legal humour (& criticism too) tends to be quite restrained.

It wasn’t just a joke. Did you watch the hearing online?

SternlyMatthews · 05/12/2025 06:40

Ereshkigalangcleg · 05/12/2025 00:59

It wasn’t just a joke. Did you watch the hearing online?

This was from reading the judgement

EmpressaurusKitty · 05/12/2025 07:03

There’s stuff on trans Reddit about email & letter campaigns & in-person protests.

It sounds as if the only thing that will satisfy them is if Guiding goes officially mixed-sex, because that’s the only way boys who identify as girls can be admitted.

One more thing girls won’t get to have any longer. But none of them give a fuck about that.

FrippEnos · 05/12/2025 07:10

DuchessFaceRobbin · 04/12/2025 18:04

I’m not sure why I’m posting here. It seems mostly people who are happy that transgirls will be banned from Guides are voicing their excitement over the announcement and displaying their bigotry here. I’m saddened by these voices, but genuinely curious about people’s views, perceptions, and knowledge of the trans community.

My daughter and her friends (ages 11/12) in Girl Guides are saddened by the announcement and will be discussing it with their troop leaders next week. Many parents I know are equally upset that the WI and GG have had to make these statements this week to avoid legal action. Protests and petitions will be forthcoming and the fight for trans rights will continue.

I’d like to ask if and why are you afraid of trans people and what threat you think a transgirl poses to a troop. I’m 50 years old and have known people from all the letters of the LGBTQ+ community most of my life and have not ever felt threatened by them. No one is trying to ‘convert’ heterosexuals or get people to change their gender. Given the current climate of hatred towards trans and gender non-conforming people (stirred up by billionaires, politicians, and the christian right), why would any child, teen, or adult “choose” to be trans? Certainly not to “infiltrate” toilets and girl’s only spaces. These people are marginalised as it is. Heterosexual cisgender men continue to be the biggest threat to each other, women, trans people…

Do any of you know anyone who is trans, non-binary, intersex? Biological sex is not as simple as you’d like it to be. 1.7% of the population is intersex - as common as twins. Approximately 1 in 4500 assigned female at birth women are born without wombs.

Ok, done rambling…

Its called safeguarding, it protects the safety of children.

Even the scouts that are currently doing a bang up job of trying to capitalise on this by putting forward a seemingly massive campaign to snag the trans girls (boys) will still have to put them in separate tents/dorms to the girls due to safeguarding.

Its not really that hard to understand.

Oh and in the same vein as "stop using CIS its offensive".
Intersex people would like you to stop lumping them together with the Trans lobby.

TheKeatingFive · 05/12/2025 07:11

EmpressaurusKitty · 05/12/2025 07:03

There’s stuff on trans Reddit about email & letter campaigns & in-person protests.

It sounds as if the only thing that will satisfy them is if Guiding goes officially mixed-sex, because that’s the only way boys who identify as girls can be admitted.

One more thing girls won’t get to have any longer. But none of them give a fuck about that.

Entitled male twats

oldtiredcyclist · 05/12/2025 07:23

This thread has "evolved" a bit hasn't it? It would seem that a murmuration of Redditors has turned up, telling people what lesbians are. I may be totally wrong, but as a bloke in his sixties, I can look back forty years to the time where I was working at a great company in London. The guys and the girls socialised regularly and I used to go our for coffee with this young woman, similar age to me. So, one day I plucked up the courage and asked her out, only to find out that she preferred women to men. Not a problem, we still went out for coffee together. As Ricky Gervais might say, what happened to all the old fashioned lesbians, the ones who like women?
In my humble opinion, a lesbian doesn't have sex with any male bodied person, irrespective of how they identify, because if they do, then they are either bisexual or heterosexual. It is all down to biology isn't it.

JeannieDark · 05/12/2025 07:37

I’m a leader in Scouting and a lot of our girls are nervous about moving up from the younger sections because the older groups are so boy heavy. Both my son and daughter are members and I’m happy we chose Scouting for my daughter but I can definitely see why some girls want a single sex group such as Guiding. I’m surprised though that the comments on posts by Guiding groups are so against this decision (and they do seem to be from members although who can ever know). I don’t know if it’s just that the members who are happy with it can’t say so openly (plausible) or if a lot of Guiding members would actually be happy with a mixed sex group? If they genuinely would like a mixed sex group then setting it up that way openly at least allows for proper safeguarding.