Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Sara Morrison vs Belfast Film Festival - Thread 2

1000 replies

TwoLoonsAndASprout · 14/11/2025 13:42

Continuation of previous thread - don’t have all the details to hand to add here, so if someone can pop them on, pls do! Want to get this up quickly!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
54
MyrtleLion · 14/11/2025 14:42

From NW

[J and panel rises to consider the application]

MyrtleLion · 14/11/2025 14:42

[break]

MarieDeGournay · 14/11/2025 14:43

So if it is the very successful waste management entrepreneur DB, and she is part of some women-in-business networks, who are affiliated in some way to one of the organisations who got the email about SM... isn't that a bit of a reach?
Storm in a teacup?

Her observable and observed reaction to 'transwomen are men' is a different matter, though.

anyolddinosaur · 14/11/2025 14:43

This must be her then - Professor probably an honorary title www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/life/the-golden-girls/28534941.html

HollerWithTheRinsinSound · 14/11/2025 14:43

Was Prof Boyd just sitting there while this was going on?

BettyBooper · 14/11/2025 14:44

'NC [goes back to Boyd's agitation and departure earlier this week] suggests this might give the appearance of bias to the journalist who approached us and possibly others'

I mean, surely this nails it. If a journo came to them with the concerns it's reasonable to think others might have similar concerns...

Boiledbeetle · 14/11/2025 14:44

BettyBooper · 14/11/2025 14:42

Yes NC!!

Exactly! It's nuts, the respondent's witnesses were proving Sara's case for her in every sentence. Why would she take a punt at this point when it could fuck her own case

thewaythatyoudoit · 14/11/2025 14:46

fanOfBen · 14/11/2025 14:28

Professor, unlike Dr, isn't a personal title - to be Professor you have to hold a chair at a university. So, which university - does anyone know? I've found a Professor Deborah Boyd at Lipscomb University Tennessee, which seems unlikely to be relevant. Then there's a Deborah Boyd who is Consultant in Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery at University Hospital Crosshous, Kilmarnock; it wouldn't be unusual for a medical consultant also to hold a university chair, but she's listed as Miss on her scot.nhs.uk page so it seems unlikely to be her. I'll keep looking...

That's as far as I got. And whatever sort of Prof you are, the university likes to plaster its site with your publications, etc, because it gets kudos/ultimately funding because of them. Also demonstrates 'impact' of the research

Boiledbeetle · 14/11/2025 14:48

anyolddinosaur · 14/11/2025 14:43

This must be her then - Professor probably an honorary title www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/life/the-golden-girls/28534941.html

So that was 2010, so she's a 65 year old Deborah Boyd from Amargh now. That and the waste thing might narrow searches down quite a bit.

WandaSiri · 14/11/2025 14:49

MarieDeGournay · 14/11/2025 14:43

So if it is the very successful waste management entrepreneur DB, and she is part of some women-in-business networks, who are affiliated in some way to one of the organisations who got the email about SM... isn't that a bit of a reach?
Storm in a teacup?

Her observable and observed reaction to 'transwomen are men' is a different matter, though.

So if it is the very successful waste management entrepreneur DB, and she is part of some women-in-business networks, who are affiliated in some way to one of the organisations who got the email about SM... isn't that a bit of a reach?
Storm in a teacup?

I think NC is saying it's the lack of online footprint which is suspicious - perhaps DB removed everything which would demonstrate her strong pro-GII views? Worse than having GII views and not attempting to conceal them, you would think.

Edited for clarity

BettyBooper · 14/11/2025 14:51

WandaSiri · 14/11/2025 14:49

So if it is the very successful waste management entrepreneur DB, and she is part of some women-in-business networks, who are affiliated in some way to one of the organisations who got the email about SM... isn't that a bit of a reach?
Storm in a teacup?

I think NC is saying it's the lack of online footprint which is suspicious - perhaps DB removed everything which would demonstrate her strong pro-GII views? Worse than having GII views and not attempting to conceal them, you would think.

Edited for clarity

Edited

Someone just posted on x

'As we all know, the Internet is forever.
If Prof. Deborah Boyd has carried out extensive housekeeping of her s.m it will come out. Always does.

So how can the Judge risk that?
She can't.
Therefore, the application must be granted.'

Easytoconfuse · 14/11/2025 14:51

Justabaker · 14/11/2025 13:49

OMG - I've been up to my eyeballs this week with end of Darlington Nurses and I did the 2 full days from the RCJ on GLP's latest folly.

This is amazing stuff - Nick Wallis doing a great job.

We (TT) are sad we couldn't attend and report but we've been crushed recently.

Hanging on X - refresh, refresh, refresh.

And may I say - I have seen NC on the warpath before - circle the wagons, get the women and children to safety.

Can I buy a lot of popcorn instead and book a back row seat for the fireworks?

MyrtleLion · 14/11/2025 14:52

CrocsNotDocs · 14/11/2025 14:33

Wouldn’t it be better to hold a recusal hearing in front of a different judge? I’ve no idea how these things work.

Not sure if this has been answered.

Recusals are held in front of the case judge because they have to decide to stop their case.

Judges are expected to recuse themselves if they are asked and it's valid. Sometimes a judge may not have realised their bias.

To not recuse themselves is contempt of court and if the Court of Appeal says she should have recused herself then that would be a bad mark. NC ABSOLUTELY WILL APPEAL the whole case on these grounds if the Judge doesn't recuse the panel. And the judge won't want that because her behaviour will be scrutinised.

So unless the judge is a million per cent sure (or convinced she can't possibly be biased) she's not biased she should recuse.

Rule of law, respect for the court etc.

fanOfBen · 14/11/2025 14:53

But if, rather than being an academic who has scrubbed her online profile (extraordinarily hard to do, you can't delete your publications from the internet), she is a non-academic with (or indeed without...) a visiting or honorary professorship somewhere, then she may well never have had an online presence. I do hope Naomi has more than we've yet heard.

WandaSiri · 14/11/2025 14:53

BettyBooper · 14/11/2025 14:51

Someone just posted on x

'As we all know, the Internet is forever.
If Prof. Deborah Boyd has carried out extensive housekeeping of her s.m it will come out. Always does.

So how can the Judge risk that?
She can't.
Therefore, the application must be granted.'

Ooh, thanks for that! Fingers crossed.

Londonmummy66 · 14/11/2025 14:53

My digging found this picture of Deborah Boyd in an Invest NI publication - perhaps one of the observers could say if it is her in the room? If so then her connections to the organisation mentioned by NC are correct as the report includes a disclosure of interest (so she does know about them....) Deborah Boyd was a Board member of
Enterprising Women Network (Armagh and
Portadown) to September 2005, which received
£8,000 (2005: nil) of financial assistance
payments from Invest NI.

Sara Morrison vs Belfast Film Festival - Thread 2
MarieDeGournay · 14/11/2025 14:54

WandaSiri · 14/11/2025 14:49

So if it is the very successful waste management entrepreneur DB, and she is part of some women-in-business networks, who are affiliated in some way to one of the organisations who got the email about SM... isn't that a bit of a reach?
Storm in a teacup?

I think NC is saying it's the lack of online footprint which is suspicious - perhaps DB removed everything which would demonstrate her strong pro-GII views? Worse than having GII views and not attempting to conceal them, you would think.

Edited for clarity

Edited

DB has a considerable online presence for being a successful, award-winning entrepreneur and supporter of women in business.
There's lots of references to her.
Now if NC is claiming that alongside her thriving career as an environmental expert, she is also publicly TWAW, that's another matter...

NoBinturongsHereMate · 14/11/2025 14:56

thewaythatyoudoit · 14/11/2025 13:49

Who was the journalist who blew the whistle? not NW. presumably

I know there are at least 2 here. And a few more people with laptops or notebooks who could be.

Londonmummy66 · 14/11/2025 14:56

The image pending is a photo and description of her work from 2005 which mentions being an employment tribunal member then so she'd have 20 odd years of experience.

MyrtleLion · 14/11/2025 14:58

Londonmummy66 · 14/11/2025 14:53

My digging found this picture of Deborah Boyd in an Invest NI publication - perhaps one of the observers could say if it is her in the room? If so then her connections to the organisation mentioned by NC are correct as the report includes a disclosure of interest (so she does know about them....) Deborah Boyd was a Board member of
Enterprising Women Network (Armagh and
Portadown) to September 2005, which received
£8,000 (2005: nil) of financial assistance
payments from Invest NI.

That's her. The chances of there being two Deborah Boyds on Trinunals in Northern Ireland are very remote.

SionnachRuadh · 14/11/2025 14:58

Employment tribunal members are appointed until retirement so it's not unusual to find one with 20+ years experience.

thewaythatyoudoit · 14/11/2025 14:58

MyrtleLion · 14/11/2025 14:52

Not sure if this has been answered.

Recusals are held in front of the case judge because they have to decide to stop their case.

Judges are expected to recuse themselves if they are asked and it's valid. Sometimes a judge may not have realised their bias.

To not recuse themselves is contempt of court and if the Court of Appeal says she should have recused herself then that would be a bad mark. NC ABSOLUTELY WILL APPEAL the whole case on these grounds if the Judge doesn't recuse the panel. And the judge won't want that because her behaviour will be scrutinised.

So unless the judge is a million per cent sure (or convinced she can't possibly be biased) she's not biased she should recuse.

Rule of law, respect for the court etc.

I used to work with someone who became a judge and was asked to recuse himself (on very good grounds). When his refusal became public there was a dreadful row and it became obvious that he was not well

GoldThumb · 14/11/2025 15:00

HollerWithTheRinsinSound · 14/11/2025 14:43

Was Prof Boyd just sitting there while this was going on?

Awks

SexRealistic · 14/11/2025 15:00

Londonmummy66 · 14/11/2025 14:53

My digging found this picture of Deborah Boyd in an Invest NI publication - perhaps one of the observers could say if it is her in the room? If so then her connections to the organisation mentioned by NC are correct as the report includes a disclosure of interest (so she does know about them....) Deborah Boyd was a Board member of
Enterprising Women Network (Armagh and
Portadown) to September 2005, which received
£8,000 (2005: nil) of financial assistance
payments from Invest NI.

Yes this is her.

She sat through the whole thing scowling and at one point she sat back and gave NC the dirtiest look.

Londonmummy66 · 14/11/2025 15:00

SionnachRuadh · 14/11/2025 14:58

Employment tribunal members are appointed until retirement so it's not unusual to find one with 20+ years experience.

Agree - I was indicating she is an experienced panellist and should be well aware of the recusancy rules.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread